Parameter Sweep Workflows for Modelling Carbohydrate Recognition

Journal of Grid Computing

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 587-601

  Kiss, Tamas ^a   Greenwell, Pamela ^a   Heindl, Hans ^a   Terstyanszky, Gabor ^a   Weingarten, Noam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bio molecular simulation; Grid portal; Grid workflow; Science gateway

Indexed keywords

BIO-MOLECULAR; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL RECOGNITION; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CARBOHYDRATE RECOGNITION; COMPLEX PARAMETER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; GRID PORTALS; GRID WORKFLOWS; INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; PARALLEL SIMULATIONS; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SCIENCE GATEWAY; SELECTIVE RECOGNITION; SIMULATION TOOL; WORK-FLOWS;

CARBOHYDRATES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MANAGEMENT; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS);

EID: 78049330490     PISSN: 15707873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10723-010-9166-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Jacq, N. et al.: Grid-enabled virtual Screening against malaria. Journal of Grid Computing 6(1), 29-43 (2008). Springer Netherlands, 2007. doi: 10. 1007/s10723-007-9085-5.
2. Goble, C. A., De Roure, D. C.: myExperiment: social networking for workflow-using e-scientists. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, Monterey, California, USA (2007), ISBN: 978-1-59593-715-5.
3. Kacsuk, P., Sipos, G.: Multi-Grid, multi-user workflows in the P-GRADE Grid Portal. Journal of Grid Computing 3(3-4), (2005). Springer, 1570-7873; 221-238. doi: 10. 1007/s10723-005-9012-6.
4. Ruvinsky, A. M.: Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions. J. Comput. Chem. 28(8), 1364-1372 (2007).
5. Teixeira, C., Barbault, F., et al.: Molecular modeling studies of N-substituted pyrrole derivatives-Potential HIV-1 gp41 inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16(6), 3039-3048 (2008).
6. Morris, G. M., et al.: Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19(14), 1639-1662.
7. Case, D. A. et al.: The Amber bio-molecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1668-1688 (2005).
8. MacKerell, A. D. et al.: CHARMM: the energy function and its parameterization with an overview of the program, in The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. 1, 271-277, P. v. R. Schleyer et al., editors. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1998).
9. Lindahl, E., et al.: GROMACS 3. 0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. Journal of Molecular Modeling 7, 306-317 (2001).
10. Bernstein, F., et al.: The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535-542 (1977).
11. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N., Bourne, P. E.: The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242 (2000). http://www. rcsb. org/pdb/home/home. do.
12. Morris, A. L., MacArthur, M. W. et al.: Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates. Proteins 12(4), 345-364 (1992).
13. Lovell, S. C., Davis, I. W. et al.: Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phipsi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins 50(3), 437-450 (2003).
14. Ramachandran, G. N. et al.: Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95-99 (1963).
15. Kacsuk, P. et al.: WS-PGRADE: supporting parameter sweep applications in workflows, 3rd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, In conjunction with SC 2008, pp. 1-10. IEEE, Austin, TX, USA (2008). doi: 10. 1109/WORKS. 2008. 4723955.
16. Novotny, J., et al.: GridSphere: an advanced portal framework, Euromicro Conference, 2004. In: Proceedings. 30th Volume, Issue, pp. 412-419, 31 Aug.-3 Sept. 2004.
17. Kacsuk, P., et al.: Supporting dynamic parameter sweep applications in workflows-lessons learnt from the CancerGrid project, PARA '08, 9th International Workshop on State-of-the-Art in Scientific and Parallel Computing, Trondheim, Norway (2008).
18. Zhang, X. L.: Roles of glycans and glycopeptides in immune system and immune-related diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 13(10), 1141-1147 (2006).
19. Crocker, P. R., Paulson, J. C., Varki, A.: Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 7(4), 255-266 (2007).
20. Erbacher, A., Gieseke, F., Handgretinger, R., Müller, I.: Dendritic cells: functional aspects of glycosylation and lectins. Hum. Immunol. 70(5), 308-312 (2009).
21. Reading, P. C., Tate, M. D., Pickett, D. L., Brooks, A. G.: Glycosylation as a target for recognition of influenza viruses by the innate immune system. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 598, 279 (2007).
22. Hricovíni, M.: Structural aspects of carbohydrates and the relation with their biological properties. Curr. Med. Chem. 11(19), 2565-2583 (2004).
23. Davis, I. W., Chen, V. B.: The KiNG manual (2007). http://kinemage. biochem. duke. edu/software/king. php.
24. Delaittre, T. et al.: GEMLCA: running legacy code applications as Grid services. Journal of Grid Computing 3, 1-2 (2005). Springer, 1570-7873, pp. 75-90.
25. Kiefer, F., Arnold, K., Künzli, M., Bordoli, L., Schwede, T.: The SWISS-MODEL repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D387-D392 (2009). http://swissmodel. expasy. org/.
26. Kenny, P. W., Sadowski, J.: Structure modification in chemical databases. In: Oprea, T. I. (ed.) Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery, pp. 271-285. Wiley (2005).
27. Weininger, D.: SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31-36 (1988).
28. Tantoso, E. et al.: Molecular Docking, an example of Grid enabled applications. New Gener. Comput. 22(2) (2004). Page numbers.
29. Tantar, A.-A., et al.: A Grid-based genetic algorithm combined with an adaptive simulated annealing for protein structure prediction. Soft Computing Journal, Springer Verlag, Special issue on Distributed Bioinspired Algorithms (2008).
30. Roh, Y. et al.: A molecular docking system using CUDA, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology, vol. 321, pp. 28-33, Daejeon, Korea (2009).
31. The UK National Grid Service. http://www. ngs. ac. uk/.
32. Laure, E., Jones, B.: Enabling Grids for e-Science: The EGEE Project, Grid Computing: Infrastructure, Service, and Application. CRC Press (2008). http://www. eu-egee. org/.
33. Gibbins, H. et al.: The Australian BioGrid Portal: empowering the molecular docking research community. In: Proceedings of the 3rd APAC Conference and Exhibition on Advanced Computing, Grid Applications and eResearch (APAC 2005), Gold Coast, Australia, 26-30 Sept. 2005.
34. Ewing, A. (ed.): DOCK Version 4. 0 Reference Manual. University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), U. S. A. (1998). http://www. cmpharm. ucsf. edu/kuntz/dock. html.
35. Foster, I.: Globus toolkit version 4: software for service-oriented systems. IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing. LNCS, vol. 3779, pp. 2-13. Springer-Verlag (2006). http://www. globus. org/.
36. Sukhwani, B., Herbordt, M.: GPU acceleration of a production molecular docking code. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 383, pp. 19-27 (2009).
37. Friedrichs, M. S. et al.: Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J. Comp. Chem. 30(6), 864-872 (2009).
38. Buyya, R., et al.: The virtual laboratory: enabling molecular modelling for drug design on the world wide Grid, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) Journal, vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 1-25. Wiley Press, USA (2003).
39. Tantar, A.-A., et al.: Docking and biomolecular simulations on computer Grids: status and trends, Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, vol. 4, No 3, pp. 235-249, Bentham Science Publishers (2008).
40. Tantar, A.-A., Melab, N., Talbi, E.-G.: A grid-based genetic algorithm combined with an adaptive simulated annealing for protein structure prediction. Soft Computing Journal, Springer Verlag, Special issue on Distributed Bioinspired Algorithms (2008). doi: 10. 1007/s00500-008-0298-8.
41. The Chemomentum Project. http://www. chemomentum. org/c9m.
42. Schuller, B., et al.: Chemomentum-UNICORE 6 based infrastructure for complex applications in science and technology, Euro-Par 2007 Workshops: Parallel Processing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4854/2008, pp. 82-93, Springer (2008).
43. Kluszczyński, R., Bała, P.: Supporting NAMD application on the Grid using GPE, In: Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4967, pp. 762-769, Springer (2008).
44. Keator, D. B., Wei, D., Gadde, S., Bockholt, J., Grethe, J. S., Marcus, D., Aucoin, N., Ozyurt, I. B.: Derived data storage and exchange workflow for large-scale neuroimaging analyses on the BIRN grid. Frontiers in Neuroscience (2009, in press). http://www. birncommunity. org/.
45. Baru, C., et al.: The SDSC Storage Resource Broker. In: Proceedings of the 1998 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research, IBM press (1998).
46. Anderson, D. P.: BOINC: a system for public-resource computing and storage. In: Fifth IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing (GRID'04), pp. 4-10, IEE Computer Society (2004).