Not your parents' presidential debates: Examining the effects of the CNN/YouTube debates on young citizens' civic engagement

Communication Studies

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 392-406

  McKinney, Mitchell S ^a   Rill, Leslie A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic Engagement; CNN YouTube Debate; Political Cynicism; Political Information Efficacy; Presidential Debates; Young Voters

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049326979     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510970903110001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E., (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson & Co.
2. Cave, D., (2008, Nov. 9). Generation O gets its hopes up. The New York Times, p. ST1 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009 from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/fashion/09boomers.html
3. Chaffee, S. H., (1978). Presidential debates: Are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs, 45, 330–346.
4. Delli Carpini, M. X., (2004). Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications on citizens' involvement in political and civic life. In L. L., Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 395–434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S., (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Healy, P., & Zeleny, J., (2007, July). Novel debate format, but same old candidates. The New York Times, p. 3 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/us/politics/24debate.html
7. Kaid, L. L., (2003). Effects of political information in the 2000 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 677–691.
8. Kaid, L. L., Johnston, A., & Hale, K., (1989). Mass media and political disapprobation. Political Communication Review, 14, 51–72.
9. Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C., (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10. Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C., (2004, November). Political information efficacy and younger voters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C., (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1093–1111.
12. Kaid, L. L., Postelnicu, M., Landreville, K., Yun, H. J., & LeGrange, A. G., (2007). The effects of political advertising on young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1137–1151.
13. Katz, E., & Feldman, J. J., (1962). The debates in the light of research: A survey of surveys. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 173–223). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
14. Lemert, J. B., (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 83–94.
15. McLeod, J. M., Bybee, C. R., & Durall, J. A., (1979). Equivalence of informed participation: The 1976 presidential debates as a source of influence. In G. C., Wilhoit & H., deBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 469–493). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. McLeod, J. M., Durrall, J., Ziemke, D. A., & Bybee, C. R., (1979). Reactions of young and older voters: Expanding the context of effects. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 348–367). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
17. McKinney, M. S., & Banwart, M. C., (2005). Rocking the youth vote through debate: Examining the effects of a citizen versus journalist controlled debate on civic engagement. Journalism Studies, 6, 153–163.
18. McKinney, M. S., & Chattopadhyay, S., (2007). Political engagement through debates: Young citizens' reactions to the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1169–1182.
19. McKinney, M. S., Kaid, L. L., & Bystrom, D. G., (2005). The role of communication in civic engagement. In M. S., McKinney, L. L., Kaid, D. G., Bystrom, & D. B., Carlin (Eds), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 3–26). New York: Peter Lang.
20. McKinney, M. S., Spiker, J. A., & Kaid, L. L., (1998). DebateWatch '96 and citizen engagement: Measuring political alienation. In T. J., Johnson, C. E., Hays, & S. P., Hays (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate American democracy (pp. 185–193). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U., (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
22. Patterson, T. E., (2002). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Knopf.
23. Pfau, M., (2003, March). The changing nature of presidential debate influence in the new age of mass media communication. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference on Presidential Rhetoric, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
24. Pfau, M., Houston, J. B., & Semmler, S. M., (2005). Presidential election campaigns and American democracy: The relationship between communication use and normative outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 48–62.
25. Popkin, S. L., (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Puzzanghera, J., (2008, August 6). MySpace friends the presidential debate commission. Los Angeles Times, p. 14 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2008/08/myspace-friends.html
27. Ricke, L., (2008). YouTube creates a new debate experience. Communication Currents. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from www.communicationcurrents.com.
28. Sears, D. O., & Chaffee, S. H., (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 223–261). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
29. Seelye, K. Q., (2007, July 24). CNN/YouTube debate ratings. The New York Times, p. 32 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/cnnyoutube-debate-ratings/
30. Spiker, J. A., (2005). Engaging the disengaged: Understanding young citizens' political malaise. In M. S., McKinney, L. L., Kaid, D. G., Bystrom, & D. B., Carlin (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 297–307). New York: Peter Lang.
31. Spiker, J. A., & McKinney, M. S., (1999). Measuring political malaise in the 1996 presidential election. In L. L., Kaid & D. G., Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 319–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Stelter, B., (2008, Jan. 23). Viewership of debate sets record. The New York Times, p. 23 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D03E6D8143BF930A15752C0A96E9C8B63.
33. Tedesco, J. C., (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1183–1194.
34. Wald, K. D., & Lupfer, M. B., (1978). The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 342–353.
35. Weiss, J., (2007, July). YouTube debate garners mixed bag: Viewership down but more young voters watched. The Boston Globe, p. 2 [Electronic version]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/07/25/youtube_debate_garners_mixed_bag/
36. Young Voters in the 2008 Presidential Election. (2008, November 28). The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from www.civicyouth.org