Effects of political information in the 2000 presidential campaign. Comparing traditional television and internet exposure

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 677-691

  Kaid, Lynda Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144432050     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202238492     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D. (2000). Patterns of Internet and traditional news media use in a net-worked community. Political Communication, 17, 21-45.
2. Andreoli, V., & Worchel, S. (1978). Effects of media, communicator and message position on attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 59-70.
3. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
4. Bennett, S. E. (1997). Why young Americans hate politics and what we should do about it. PS, 30, 47-53.
5. Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6. Brians, C. L., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 172-193.
7. Center for Media and Public Affairs. (2000). Campaign 2000 final: How TV news covered the general election campaign. Media Monitor, 16(6), 1-9.
8. Cohen, A. (1976). Radio vs. TV: The effects of the medium. Journal of Communication, 26, 29-35.
9. Cutbirth, C. W., & Coombs, T. (1997, November). The coming electronic democracy: The Internet, political communication, and the duties of citizenship. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Chicago.
10. The Democracy Online Project. (2000, December 4). Retrieved from http://www.democracyonline.org/databank/dec2000survey.shtml.
11. Devlin, L. P. (2001). Contrast in presidential campaign commercials of 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2338-2369.
12. Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print. Communication Research, 28, 48-78.
13. Garramone, G., Atkin, C. K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Cole, R. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 299-311.
14. Ha, L., & Lincoln, J. E. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42, 456-473.
15. Jacques, W. W., & Ratzan, S. C. (1997). The Internet's World Wide Web and political accountability: New media coverage of the 1996 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1226-1237.
16. Just, M., Crigler, A., & Wallach, L. (1990). Thirty seconds or thirty minutes: What viewers learn from spot advertisements and candidate debates. Journal of Communication, 40, 120-133.
17. Kaid, L. L. (2002). Political advertising and information seeking: Comparing the exposure via traditional and Internet media channels. Journal of Advertising, 31, 27-35.
18. Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
19. Katz, E., & Feldman, J. (1962). The debates in light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 173-223). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20. Laswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). New York: Harper.
21. Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1987). The confidence gap (Rev. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22. Martinelli, K. A., & Chaffee, S. H. (1995). Measuring new voter learning via three channels of political information. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 18-32.
23. McKinney, M. S., & Gaddie, K. C. (2000, November). The medium and the message: TV vs. Internet viewing of a presidential primary debate. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle.
24. McKinnon, L. M., & Tedesco, J. C. (1999). The influence of medium and media commentary on presidential debate effects. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election (pp. 191-206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. McKinnon, L. M., Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (1993). The third 1992 presidential debate: Channel and commentary effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 106-118.
26. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York: New American Library.
27. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999, July). Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html.
28. Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. D. (1976). The unseeing eye: Myth of television power in politics. New York: G.P. Putnam.
29. Pearlstein, S. (1996, January 30). Angry female voters a growing force, Washington Post, p. 1, A5.
30. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2000). Youth vote influenced by online information: Internet election news audience seeks convenience, familiar names. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=27.
31. Rosenstone, S. J., Kinder, D. R., Miller, W. E., & the National Election Studies. (1997). American National Election Study, 1996: Pre- and post-election survey (Computer file). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [Producer]. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor].
32. Rumbough, T., & Tomlinson, J. (2000, November). Internet 2000: Evolution of Internet content and effects. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle.
33. Sundar, S. S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 480-499.
34. Sundar, S. S., Hesser, K. M., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (1998, July). The effect of Website interactivity on political persuasion. Paper presented at the 21st General Assembly & Scientific Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Glasgow, UK.
35. Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2000, November). Candidate Web sites and voter effects: Investigating uses and gratifications. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle.
36. Vancil, D. L., & Pendell, S. D. (1987). The myth of viewer-listener disagreement in the first Kennedy-Nixon debates. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 16-27.