Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography

Coronary Artery Disease

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 414-419

  Ozbulbul, Nilgun Isiksalan ^a   Yurdakul, Mehmet ^a   Tola, Muharrem ^a  

^a TURKIYE YUKSEK IHTISAS HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

cardiac imaging; contrast media; coronary angiography; coronary arteries; MDCT

Indexed keywords

IODIXANOL; IOPAMIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY SINUS; DIZZINESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NAUSEA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DRUG TOXICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 78049273166     PISSN: 09546928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328338cd0b     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart 2005; 91:938-941. (Pubitemid 40874086)
2. Gopalakrishnan P, Wilson GT, Tak T. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: a pooled estimate. Cardiol Rev 2008; 16:189-196.
3. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296:403-411.
4. Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo AA, Malagò R, La Grutta L, Meiijboom WB, et al. Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:576-583. (Pubitemid 351248186)
5. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, Saia F, Midiri M, de Feyter PJ, et al. Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:430-433.
6. Shim SS, Kim Y, Lim SM. Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:649-654.
7. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van der Lugt A, et al. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Iopromide 370 vs. Iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:349-353.
8. Spencer CM, Goa KL. Iodixanol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and diagnostic use as an X-ray contrast medium. Drugs 1996; 52:899-927.
9. Bergstra A, van Dijk RB, Brekke O, Buurma AE, Orozco L, den Heijer P, et al. Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50:314-321.
10. Nguyen SA, Suranyi P, Ravenel JG, Randall PK, Romano PB, Strom KA, et al. Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT: effect on kidney function. Radiology 2008; 248:97-105.
11. Heinrich MC, Häberle L, Müller V, Bautz W, Uder M. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology 2009; 250:68-86.
12. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, Raaijmakers RH, Mollet N, Pattynama PM, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004; 233:817-823.
13. Tsai IC, Lee T, Tsai WL, Chen MC, Wu MJ, Lee WL, et al. Contrast enhancement in cardiac MDCT: comparison of iodixanol 320 vs. iohexol 350. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190:47-53.
14. Pannu HK, Thompson RE, Phelps J, Magee CA, Fishman EK. Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol. Acad Radiol 2005; 12:576-584.
15. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007; 42:856-861.
16. Scheller B, Hennen B, Thünenkötter T, Mrowietz C, Markwirth T, Schieffer H, et al. Effect of X-ray contrast media on blood flow properties after coronary angiography. Thromb Res 1999; 96:253-260.
17. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, McFadden EP, Stijnen T, de Feyter PJ, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005; 236:661-665.
18. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241:378-385.
19. Shapiro MD, Pena AJ, Nichols JH, Worrell S, Bamberg F, Dannemann N, et al. Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66:37-41.
20. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175:621-628.
21. McCullough PA, Bertrand ME, Brinker JA, Stacul F. A meta-analysis of the renal safety of isosmolar iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:692-699.