Accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography a Pooled estimate

Cardiology in Review

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 189-196

  Gopalakrishnan, Prabhakaran ^a   Wilson, Gregory T ^b   Tak, Tahir ^c,d  

^a JPS Health Network   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c Franciscan Skemp Healthcare Mayo Health System   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Coronary calcium score; Ct angiography; Noninvasive coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MEDLINE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PUBMED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 49149114791     PISSN: 10615377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318164d02a     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK, Proudfit WL, et al. Cinecoronary arteriography. Circulation. 1959;20:773-774.
2. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update. A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85-e151. Erratum in: Circulation. 2006;113:e696.
3. Knez A, Becker C, Ohnesorge B, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis by multislice helical computed tomography. Circulation. 2000;101:E221-E222.
4. Nakanishi T, Kayashima Y, Inoue R, et al. Pitfalls in 16-detector row CT of the coronary arteries. Radiographics. 2005;25:425-438.
5. Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Cury RC, et al. Coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:797-806.
6. Ueyama K, Ohashi H, Tsutsumi Y, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:322-326.
7. Yamaguchi A, Adachi H, Ino T, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography as preoperative evaluation of a patent internal thoracic artery graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:811-812.
8. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:597-603.
9. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T, et al. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computedtomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:790-795.
10. Hendel R, Patel M, Kramer C, et al. ACC/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR Appropriateness criteria for cardiac tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1-23.
11. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:145-148.
12. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187: 111-117.
13. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-X 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:343-348.
14. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, et al. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97: 173-174.
15. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:575-582.
16. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112:2318-2323.
17. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552-557.
18. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:147-154.
19. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1482-1487.
20. Lim MC, Wong TW, Yaneza LO, et al. Non-invasive detection of significant coronary artery disease with multi-section computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:174-180.
21. Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Broadley AJ, et al. 16-Detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol. 2006;6:749-757.
22. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH, et al. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006;296:403-411.
23. Nikolaou K, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Clinical value of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with a low pretest likelihood of significant disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1659-1668.
24. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1506-1510.
25. Rodevand O, Hogalmen G, Gudim LP, et al. Limited usefulness of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-detector multislice computer tomography at a community hospital. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006; 40:76-82.
26. Ghersin E, Litmanovich D, Dragu R, et al. 16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186: 177-184.
27. Paijitprapaporn P, Jongjirasiri S, Tangpagasit L, et al. Accuracy of sixteen-slice CT scanners in detected coronary artery disease. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89:72-80.
28. Gulati GS, Seth S, Kurian S, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease with 16-slice computed tomography. Natl Med J India. 2005;18:236-241.
29. Carmo MM, Ferreira T, Quininha J, et al. Non-invasive coronary artery evaluation with multidetector computed tomography. Rev Port Cardiol. 2005;24:667-679.
30. Gaspar T, Dvir D, Peled N. The role of 16-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: large sample analysis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7:424-427.
31. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of threedimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:92-100.
32. Kaiser C, Bremerich J, Haller S, et al. Limited diagnostic yield of non-invasive coronary angiography by 16-slice multi-detector spiral computed tomography in routine patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1987-1992.
33. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart. 2005; 91:938-941.
34. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 X 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1978-1986.
35. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005;293:2471-2478. Erratum in: JAMA. 2005;294:1208.
36. Heuschmid M, Kuettner A, Schroeder S, et al. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1413-1419.
37. Moon JY, Chung N, Choi BW, et al. The utility of multi-detector row spiral CT for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:86-94.
38. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Marano R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments. Radiol Med (Torino). 2005;109:91-97.
39. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Salm LP, et al. Noninvasive coronary imaging and assessment of left ventricular function using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:571-574.
40. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, et al. Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre, 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2005;91:308-313.
41. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:128-132.
42. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:123-127.
43. Burgstahler C, Beck T, Kuettner A, et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in elderly patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:734-738.
44. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Hall PA, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography: agreement of multi-slice spiral computed tomography and selective catheter angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004;20:549-552.
45. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation. 2004;110: 2638-2643.
46. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44: 1230-1237.
47. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multi-slice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2265-2270.
48. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1043-1048.
49. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation. 2003;107:664-666.
50. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.
51. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J. 2006;151: 1323.e1-1323.e6.
52. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1879-1885.
53. Murai S, Hamada S, Yamamoto S, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using multidetector-row CT with Japanese patients. Radiat Med. 2006;24:72-76.
54. Stauder NI, Kuttner A, Schroder S, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2512-2520.
55. Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:976-980.
56. Yamamoto M, Kimura F, Niinami H, et al. Noninvasive assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery by 16-channel multidetectorrow computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:820-827.
57. Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:336-344.
58. Burgstahler C, Beck T, Kuettner A, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-row multi-slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Int J Cardiol. 2006;106:244-249.
59. Bartnes K, Sildnes T, Iqbal A, et al. Coronary bypass graft patency cannot be determined by multidetector spiral computed tomography. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006;40:83-86.
60. Salm LP, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J. 2005;150:775-781.
61. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, et al. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1094-1097.
62. Song MH, Ito T, Watanabe T, et al. Multidetector computed tomography versus coronary angiogram in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:585-588.
63. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, et al. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology. 2003;229:749-756.
64. Burgstahler C, Kuettner A, Kopp AF, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience. Int J Cardiol. 2003;90:275-280.
65. Yoo KJ, Choi D, Choi BW, et al. The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24: 86-91.
66. Ko YG, Choi DH, Jang YS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Yonsei Med J. 2003; 44:438-444.
67. van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multi-slice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2006;114:645-653.
68. Kefer JM, Coche E, Vanoverschelde JL, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17:87-96.
69. Watanabe M, Uemura S, Iwama H, et al. Usefulness of 16-slice multislice spiral computed tomography for follow-up study of coronary stent implantation. Circ J. 2006;70:691-697.
70. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2006;92:58-61.
71. Ohnuki K, Yoshida S, Ohta M, et al. New diagnostic technique in multi-slice computed tomography for in-stent restenosis: pixel count method. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108:251-258.
72. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573-1579.
73. Cademartiri F, Marano R, Runza G, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 2005;109:500-507.
74. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:427-430.
75. Mori S, Kondo C, Suzuki N, et al. Volumetric coronary angiography using the 256-detector row computed tomography scanner: comparison in vivo and in vitro with porcine models. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:186-191.
76. Knollmann F, Pfoh A. Image in cardiovascular medicine. Coronary artery imaging with flat-panel computed tomography. Circulation. 2003; 107:1209.
77. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:331-335.
78. Hecht HS, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, et al. Coronary artery calcium scanning: clinical paradigms for cardiac risk assessment and treatment. Am Heart J. 2006;151:1139-1146.
79. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1107-1118.
80. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A, et al. Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection-initial results. Radiology. 2005;234:98-108.
81. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1867-1878.
82. Lembcke A, Hein PA, Dohmen PM, et al. Pictorial review: electron beam computed tomography and multislice spiral computed tomography for cardiac imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:356-367.
83. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2006;151:404-411.