A memory-based account of retrospective revaluation

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 153-164

  Jamieson, Randall K ^a   Hannah, Samuel D ^b   Matthew, J C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative learning; Instance theory; Minerva 2; Retrospective revaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 78049269098     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020886     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (2005). Simulations of a modified SOP model applied to retrospective revaluation of human causal learning. Learning and Behaviour, 33, 147-159.
2. Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA 2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371-391.
3. Beckers, T., Miller, R., De Houwer, J., & Urushihara, K. (2006). Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92-102.
4. Blaisdell, A. P., Günther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1999). Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 63-76.
5. Blaser, R. E., Couvillon, P. A., & Bitterman, M. E. (2004). Backward blocking in honeybees. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 349-360.
6. Bouton, M. E., & Moody, E. W. (2004). Memory processes in classical conditioning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 28, 663-674.
7. Brooks, L. R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
8. Brooks, L. R. (1987). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 141-174). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
10. Clark, S. E. (1997). A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 232-238.
11. Daw, N. D., & Courville, A. C. (2007). The pigeon as particle filter. In J. Piatt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, S. Roweis (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 20 (pp. 369-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 397-416.
13. Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVADM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
14. Fagot, J., & Cook, R. G. (2006). Evidence for large long-term memory capacities in baboons and pigeons and its implications for learning and the evolution of cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103(46), 17564-17567.
15. Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289-344.
16. Ghirlanda, S. (2005). Retrospective revaluation as simple associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 107-111.
17. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
18. Griffiths, D. P., Dickinson, A., & Clayton, N. S. (1999). Declarative and episodic memory: What can animals remember about their past? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 74-80.
19. Hare, J. F., & Atkins, B. A. (2001). The squirrel that cried wolf: Reliability detection by juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii). Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 51, 108-112.
20. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96-101.
21. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
22. Hintzman, D. L. (1987). Recognition and recall in MINERVA-2: Analysis of the "recognition failure paradigm. In P. E. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 215-229). London, England: Wiley.
23. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
24. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299.
25. Jamieson, R. K., Crump, J. C. M., & Hannah, S. D. (2010). An instancebased account of associative learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Jamieson, R. K., Holmes, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (in press). Global similarity predicts dissociation of classification and recognition: Evidence questioning the implicit/explicit learning distinction in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
27. Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2009a). Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: Inferring grammaticality from similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 550-575.
28. Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2009b). Applying an exemplar model to the serial reaction time task: Anticipating from experience. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1757-1783.
29. Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2010). Applying an exemplar model to the artificial grammar task: String completion and performance on individual items. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1014-1039.
30. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment (pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31. Kart-Teke, E., De Souza Silva, M. A., Huston, J. P., & Dere, E. (2006). Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 85, 173-182.
32. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
33. Kruschke, J. K. (1996). Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 3-26.
34. Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863.
35. Kwantes, P. J. (2005). Using context to build semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 703-710.
36. Kwantes, P. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 306-315.
37. Kwantes, P. J., & Neal, A. (2006). Why people underestimate y when extrapolating in linear functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1019-1030.
38. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
39. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400.
40. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
41. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
42. Melchers, K. G., Lachnit, H., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and indirect learning: A challenge for comparator theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 25-53.
43. Miller, R. R., & Escobar, M. (2001). Contrasting acquisition-focused and performance-focused models of acquired behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 141-145.
44. Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386.
45. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 22 (pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46. Miller, R. R., & Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
48. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 82, 532-552.
49. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 504-509.
50. Rescorla, R. A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75, 77-81.
51. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning 11 (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
52. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 1-21.
53. Stout, S. C, & Miller, R. R. (2007). Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114, 759-783.
54. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135-170.
55. Urcelay, G. P., Perelmuter, O., & Miller, R. R. (2008). Pavlovian backward conditioned inhibition in humans: Summation and retardation tests. Behavioural Processes, 77, 299-305.
56. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning & Motivation, 25, 127-151.
57. Vokey, J. R., & Higham, P. A. (2004). Opposition logic and neural network models in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 565-578.
58. Von Restorff, H. (1933). Uber die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Sperunfeld [On the effect of spheres formations in the trace field]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 448-456.
59. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behaviour. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 547-565.
61. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
62. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancy attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 14-33.