Mass transfer and transport during purification of fructooligosaccharides by nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 365, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 356-365

  Kuhn, R C ^a   Maugeri Filho, F ^a   Silva, V ^b   Palacio, L ^b   Hernandez A ^b   Pradanos P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Fructooligosaccharides purification; Mass transfer; Nanofiltratrion; Pore size distribution

Indexed keywords

CONSTANT VOLUMES; DIAFILTRATION; DIFFUSION AND CONVECTION; ENZYMATIC TRANSFORMATION; FRUCTO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES; INITIAL SOLUTION; MASS BALANCE; NANOFILTRATRION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; SOLUTE ADSORPTION; SUGAR CANE MOLASSES;

ADSORPTION; MASS TRANSFER; MOLASSES; NANOFILTRATION; PURIFICATION; SIZE DETERMINATION; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGAR CANE;

PORE SIZE;

FRUCTOSE OLIGOSACCHARIDE; MOLASSES; SUCROSE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DIAFILTRATION; DIFFUSION; ENERGY TRANSFER; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE RESISTANCE; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURIFICATION; QUANTUM YIELD; SUGARCANE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 78049266788     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fernandez R.C., Maresma B.G., Juarez A., Martinez J. Production of fructooligosaccharides by β-fructofuranosidase from Aspergillus sp 27H. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 79:268-272.
2. Hidaka H., Hirayama M., Sumi N. A fructooligosaccharides producing enzyme from Aspergillus niger ATCC 20611. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1998, 52:1181-1187.
3. Shin H.T., Baig S.Y., Lee S.W., Suh D.S., Kwon S.T., Lim Y.B., Lee J.H. Production of fructo-oligosaccharides from molasses by Aureobasidium pullulans cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:59-62.
4. Antosová M., Polakovic M. Fructosyltransferases: the enzymes catalyzing production of fructooligosaccharides. Chem. Papers 2001, 55(6):350-358.
5. Yun J.W., Fructooligosaccharides Occurrence, preparation, and application. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 1996, 19:107-117.
6. Cheng Y.L, Lee T.Y. Separation of fructose and glucose mixture by zeolite Y. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 40(4):498-504.
7. Crittenden R.G., Playne M.J. Production, properties and applications of food-grade oligosaccharides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 7:353-361.
8. Goulas A.K., Kapasakalidis P.G., Sinclair H.R., Rastall R.A., Grandison A.S. Purification of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:321-335.
9. Li W., Li J., Chen T., Chen C. Study on nanofiltration for purifying fructo-oligosaccharides I Operation modes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 245:123-129.
10. Gonzalez-Muñoz M.J., Parajó J.C. Diafiltration of eucalyptus Wood autohydrolysis liquors: mathematical modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346:98-104.
11. Otero J.A., Mazarrasa O., Villasante J., Silva V., Prádanos P., Calvo J.I., Hernández A. Three independent ways to obtain information on pore size distributions of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309:17-27.
12. Li W., Li J., Chen T., Zhao Z., Chen C. Study on nanofiltration for purifying fructo-oligosaccharides II. Extended pore model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:8-15.
13. Prádànos P., de Abajo J., de la Campa J.G., Hernández A. A comparative analysis of flux limit models for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 108:129-142.
14. Prádanos P., Arribas J.I., Hernandez A. Retention of proteins in cross-flow uf through asymmetric inorganic membranes. AIChE J. 1994, 40:1901-1910.
15. Dechadilok P., Deen W.M. Hindrance factors for diffusion and convection in pores. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:6953-6959.
16. Wesolowska K., Koter S., Bodzek M. Modelling of nanofiltration in softening water. Desalination 2004, 162:137-151.
17. Le M.S., Howell J.A. Alternative model for ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1984, 62:373.
18. Nobrega R., de Balmann H., Aimar P., Sánchez V. Transfer of dextran through ultrafiltration membranes: a study of rejection data analyzed by gel permeation chromatography. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 45:17.
19. Prádanos P., Hernández A. Cross-flow ultrafiltration of proteins through polysulfonic membranes: retention curves and pore size distributions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 47:617.
20. Ochoa N.A., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Pagliero C., Marchese J., Hernandez A. Pore size distributions based on AFM imaging and retention of multidisperse polymer solutes Characterisation of polyethersulfone UF membranes with dopes containing different PVP. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 187:227-237.
21. Maugeri F., Hernalteens S. Screening of yeast strains for transfructosylating activity. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic 2007, 49:43-49.
22. Lin S.C., Lee W.C. Separation of a fructo-oligosaccharide mixture by hydrophilic interaction chromatography using silica-based micropellicular sorbents. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 803:302-306.
23. Tanninen J., Platt S., Weis A., Nystrom M. Long-term acid resistance and selectivity of NF membranes in very acidic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 240:11-18.
24. R.C. Kuhn, L. Palacio, P. Prádanos, A. Hernández, F. Maugeri-Filho, Selection of membranes for purification of fructooligosaccharides, Desalination and Water Treat., in press.
25. Ho W.S.W., Sirkar K.K. Membrane Handbook 1992, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
26. Schock G., Miquel A. Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules. Desalination 1987, 64:339-352.
27. Einstein A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik 1905, 322:549-560.
28. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 90th edition. R.L. David (Ed.).
29. Jacob J., Prádanos P., Calvo J.I., Hernández A., Jonsson G. Fouling kinetics and associated dynamics of structural modifications. Colloids Surf. A 1998, 138:173-183.
30. Silva V., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Calvo J.I., Hernández A. Relevance of hindrance factors and hydrodynamic pressure gradient in the modelization of the transport of neutral solutes across nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149:78-86.
31. Silva V., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Hernandez A. Alternative pore hindrance factors: what one should be used for nanofiltration modelization?. Desalination 2009, 245:606-613.
32. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1337.
33. Cuartas-Uribe B., Vincent-Vela M.C., Álvarez-Blanco S., Alcaina-Miranda M.I., Soriano-Costa E. Application of nanofiltration models for the prediction of lactose retention using three modes of operation. J. Food Eng. 2010, 99:373-376.