The cost of sexual signaling in yeast

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3114-3122

  Smith, Carl ^a   Greig, Duncan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fitness; Reproductive strategies; Selection sexual; Signaling courtship

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ATTRACTANT; BIOASSAY; CELL ORGANELLE; COURTSHIP; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GROWTH RATE; MATING SUCCESS; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE COST; SELECTION; SEX PHEROMONE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SIGNALING; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FUNGAL GENE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MEIOSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MEIOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PHEROMONES; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 77958567268     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01069.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderrson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ
2. Basolo, A. L., and G. Alcaraz 2003. The turn of the sword: length increases male swimming costs in swordtails. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:1631-1636.
3. Cotton S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Evolution 58:1038-1046.
4. Jackson, C. L., and L. H. Hartwell 1990. Courtship in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an early cell-cell interaction during mating. Cell 63:1039-1051.
5. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:43-70.
6. Kotiaho, J. S. 2000. Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48:188-194.
7. Lenski, R. E., M. R. Rose, S. C. Simpson, and S. C. Tadler 1991. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2, 000 generations. Am. Nat. 138:1315-1341.
8. Greig, D., and J.-Y. Leu 2009. Natural history of budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 19:R886-R890.
9. Maynard-Smith, J. 1987. Sexual selection-a classification of models. Pp. 9-20 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. J. Wiley, Chichester, UK
10. Maynard Smith, J., and D. Harper 2003. Animal signals. Oxford Univ. Press, UK
11. McCusker, J. H., and J. E. Haber 1988. crl mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resemble both mutants affecting general control of amino acid biosynthesis and omnipotent translational suppressor mutants. Genetics 119:303-315.
12. Møller, A. P., and F. De Lope 1994. Differential costs of a secondary sexual character: an experimental test of the handicap principle. Evolution 48:1676-1683.
13. Mortimer, R. K., and J. R. Johnston 1986. Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. Genetics 113:35-43.
14. Nahon, E., D. Atzmony, A. Zahavi, and D. Granot 1995. Mate selection in yeast: A reconsideration of the signals and the message encoded by them. J. Theor. Biol. 172:315-322.
15. Nicoletto, P. F. 1991. The relationship between male ornamentation and swimming performance in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28:365-370.
16. Pagel, M. 1993. Honest signaling among gametes. Nature 363:539-541.
17. Replansky, T., K. Vassiliki, D. Greig, and G. Bell 2008. Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:494-501.
18. Rogers, D. W., and D. Greig 2009. Experimental evolution of a sexually selected display in yeast. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 276:543-549.
19. Ruderfer, D. M., S. C. Pratt, H. S. Seidel, and L. Kruglyak 2006. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat. Genet. 38:1077-1081.
20. Saino, N., A. M. Bolzern, and A. P. Møller 1997. Immunocompetence, ornamentation, and viability of male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:549-552.
21. Sprague, G. F., and J. W. Thorner 1992. Mating pheromones and signal transduction. Pp. 657-744 in E. W. Jones, J. R. Pringle and J. R. Broach, eds. The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces-gene expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY
22. Tsai, I. J., D. Bensasson, A. Burt, and V. Koufopanou 2008. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:4957-4962.
23. Yu, C. R., C. Gustavo Pesce, A. Colman-Lerner, L. Lok, D. Pincus, E. Serra, M. Holl, K. Benjamin, A. Gordon, and R. Brent 2008. Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signaling. Nature 456:755-761.
24. Zahavi, A. J. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Theor. Biol. 53:205-214.
25. Zeyl, C., C. Curtin, K. Karnap, and E. Beauchamp 2005. Antagonism between sexual and natural selection in experimental populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolution 59:2109-2115.