Experimental evolution of a sexually selected display in yeast

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 276, Issue 1656, 2009, Pages 543-549

  Rogers, David W ^a   Greig, Duncan ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Experimental evolution; Mate choice; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sexual display; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ALLELE; EVOLUTION; MATE CHOICE; MODEL TEST; PHEROMONE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING; YEAST;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENETIC MODEL; NONHUMAN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL DETECTION; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 58149106187     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1146     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Andersson, M. & Simmons, L. W. 2006 Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296-302.
3. Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. 1991 Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127, 229-255.
4. Brachmann, C. B., Davies, A., Cost, G. J., Caputo, E., Li, J., Hieter, P. & Boeke, J. D. 1998 Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14, 115-132.
5. Burke, D., Dawson, D. & Stearns, T. 2000 Methods in yeast genetics, 2000 edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
6. Jackson, C. L. & Hartwell, L. H. 1990a Courtship in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an early cell-cell interaction during mating. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2202-2213.
7. Jackson, C. L. & Hartwell, L. H. 1990b Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal. Cell 63, 1039-1051.
8. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982 Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36, 1-12.
9. Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D. & Brooks, R. 2006 Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 43-66.
10. Kotiaho, J. S. 2001 Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol. Rev. 76, 365-376.
11. Kotiaho, J. S. & Puurtinen, M. 2007 Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. Funct. Ecol. 21, 638-644.
12. Lenski, R. E. & Travisano, M. 1994 Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6808-6814.
13. Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. 1991 Long-termexperimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315-1341.
14. Maynard Smith, J. 1987 Sexual selection - a classification of models. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (eds J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Andersson), pp. 9-20. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. Maynard Smith, J. 1991 Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 146-151.
16. Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. 2003 Animal signals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. McCusker, J. H. & Haber, J. E. 1988 Cycloheximide-resistant temperature-sensitive lethal mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 119, 303-315.
18. Mortimer, R. K. & Johnston, J. R. 1986 Genealogy of principal strains of the Yeast Genetic Stock Center. Genetics 113, 35-43.
19. Pagel, M. 1993 Honest signalling among gametes. Nature 363, 539-541.
20. Pizzari, T. & Snook, R. R. 2003 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57, 1223-1236.
21. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A. P. 1995 A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. B 260, 21-29.
22. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996 The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 263, 1415-1421.
23. Segrè, A. V., Murray, A. W. & Leu, J. Y. 2006 High-resolution mutation mapping reveals parallel experimental evolution in yeast. PLoS Biol. 4, e256.
24. Sen, M., Shah, A. & Marsh, L. 1997 Two types of α-factor receptor determinants for pheromone specificity in the mating-incompatible yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. kluyveri. Curr. Genet. 31, 235-240.
25. Snook, R. R., Robertson, A., Crudgington, H. S. & Ritchie, M. G. 2005 Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution in courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Genet. 35, 245-255.
26. Tong, A. H. et al. 2001 Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368.
27. Zeyl, C. 2006 Experimental evolution with yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 6, 685-691.