Multi-task active learning for linguistic annotations

ACL-08: HLT - 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 861-869

  Reichart, Roi ^a   Tomanek, Katrin ^b   Hahn, Udo ^b   Rappoport, Ari ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; EXAMPLE SELECTION; NAMED ENTITIES; RANDOM SELECTION; SELECTED EXAMPLES; SYNTACTIC PARSE TREE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 77958564771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Jason Baldridge and Miles Osborne. 2004. Active learning and the total cost of annotation. In Proceedings of EMNLP'04, pages 9-16.
2. Markus Becker and Miles Osborne. 2005. A two-stage method for active learning of statistical grammars. In Proceedings of IJCAI'05, pages 991-996.
3. Daniel M. Bickel. 2005. Code developed at the University of Pennsylvania, http://www.cis.upenn.edu/̃dbikel/software.html.
4. Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123-140.
5. David A. Cohn, Zoubin Ghahramani, and Michael I. Jordan. 1996. Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:129-145.
6. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Sean Engelson and Ido Dagan. 1996. Minimizing manual annotation cost in supervised training from corpora. In Proceedings of ACL'96, pages 319-326.
8. Yoav Freund, Sebastian Seung, Eli Shamir, and Naftali Tishby. 1997. Selective sampling using the query by committee algorithm. Machine Learning, 28(2- 3):133-168.
9. Ben Hachey, Beatrice Alex, and Markus Becker. 2005. Investigating the effects of selective sampling on the annotation task. In Proceedings of CoNLL'05, pages 144-151.
10. Tin Kam Ho, Jonathan J. Hull, and Sargur N. Srihari. 1994. Decision combination in multiple classifier systems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(1):66-75.
11. Rebecca Hwa. 2004. Sample selection for statistical parsing. Computational Linguistics, 30(3):253-276.
12. John D. Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando Pereira. 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of ICML'01, pages 282-289.
13. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
14. Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Alan Lee, and Aravind K. Joshi. 2008. Sense annotation in the penn discourse treebank. In Proceedings of CICLing'08, pages 275-286.
15. Grace Ngai and David Yarowsky. 2000. Rule writing or annotation: Cost-efficient resource usage for base noun phrase chunking. In Proceedings of ACL'00, pages 117-125.
16. Tomoko Ohta, Yuka Tateisi, and Jin-Dong Kim. 2002. The GENIA corpus: An annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Proceedings of HLT'02, pages 82-86.
17. Martha Palmer, Paul Kingsbury, and Daniel Gildea. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71- 106.
18. Roi Reichart and Ari Rappoport. 2007. An ensemble method for selection of high quality parses. In Proceedings of ACL'07, pages 408-415, June.
19. Burr Settles. 2004. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proceedings of JNLPBA'04, pages 107-110.
20. Dan Shen, Jie Zhang, Jian Su, Guodong Zhou, and Chew Lim Tan. 2004. Multi-criteria-based active learning for named entity recognition. In Proceedings of ACL'04, pages 589-596.
21. Min Tang, Xiaoqiang Luo, and Salim Roukos. 2001. Active learning for statistical natural language parsing. In Proceedings of ACL'02, pages 120-127.
22. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the CONLL-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL'03, pages 142-147.
23. Katrin Tomanek and Udo Hahn. 2008. Approximating learning curves for active-learning-driven annotation. In Proceedings of LREC'08.
24. Katrin Tomanek, Joachim Wermter, and Udo Hahn. 2007. An approach to text corpus construction which cuts annotation costs and maintains corpus reusability of annotated data. In Proceedings of EMNLPCoNLL'07, pages 486-495.
25. Jingbo Zhu and Eduard Hovy. 2007. Active learning for word sense disambiguation with methods for addressing the class imbalance problem. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL'07, pages 783-790.