An exploratory study of Principal Investigator roles in UK university Proof-of-Concept processes: An Absorptive Capacity perspective

R and D Management

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 455-473

  Mcadam, Maura ^a   Mcadam, Rodney ^b   Galbraith, Brendan ^b   Miller, Kristel ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958556984     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: 14679310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00619.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, T.R., Daim, T.U. and Lavoie, F.F. (2007) Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 25, 5, 306-318.
2. Baum, J. and Silverman, B. (2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 3, 411-436.
3. Bearing Point. (2006) Invest Northern Ireland, Proof of Concept Pilot Programme Evaluation. London: Bearing Point.
4. Brown, A. and Soderstrom, E. (2002) Start-Up and Equity Primer. Yale: Association of University Technology Managers Publication.
5. Campbell, A.F. (2005) The evolving concept of value added in university commercialization. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11, 4, 337-346.
6. Chang, Y., Chen, M., Yang, P. and Hua, M. (2008) Universities as patent- and licensing income-generating institutions: a survey in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, 42, 3, 290-309.
7. Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D. and Wright, M. (2005) Assessing the relative performance of UK technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34, 3, 369-384.
8. Chiesa, V. and Piccaluga, A. (1998) Transforming rather than transferring scientific and technological knowledge - the contribution of academic 'spin out' companies: the Italian way. In: Oakey, R.P. and During, W.E. (eds), New Technology-Based Firms in the 1990s, Vol. 5. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
9. Chrisman, J.J., Hynes, T. and Fraser, S. (1995) Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 267-281.
10. Cockburn, I. (2000) The changing structure of the pharmaceutical industry. Health Affairs, 23, 1, 10-23.
11. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, 128-152.
12. Collier, A. (2007) Australian framework for the commercialisation of university scientific research. Promentheus, 25, 1, 51-68.
13. Daghfous, A. (2004) Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69, 2, 21-27.
14. Darby, M.F. and Zucker, L.G. (2002) Going public when you can in biotechnology. NBER Working Paper 8954.
15. De Coster, R. and Butler, C. (2005) Assessment of proposals for new technology ventures in the UK: characteristics of university spin-off companies. Technovation, 25, 5, 535-543.
16. Decter, M., Bennett, D. and Leseure, M. (2007) University to business technology transfer - UK and USA comparisons. Technovation, 27, 3, 145-155.
17. Etzkowitz, H. (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 8, 823-834.
18. Evans, G., Keogh, W. and Aldhous, T. (2001) The role of science parks in regional development: a case study - the Aberdeen science and technology parks. Proceedings of the XV IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks, Australia.
19. Feller, I. (1997) Technology transfer from universities. In: Smarts, J.C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, XII. New York: Agathon Press.
20. Fogelberg, H. and Sanden, B. (2008) Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: an analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 1, 65-78.
21. Fosfuri, A. and Tribo, J. (2008) Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36, 2, 173-187.
22. Franklin, M. and Lockett, A. (2001) Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-off companies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 127-141.
23. Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Burns, P. and Diment, K. (2005) Common purpose and divided loyalties: the risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers. R & D Management, 35, 5, 535-544.
24. HEFCE. (2007) Business and community: higher education innovation fund Available at (accessed June 2008).
25. Jones, O. and Craven, M. (2001) Beyond the routine: innovation management and the teaching company scheme. Technovation, 21, 5, 267-279.
26. Kirby, D.A. (2006) Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5, 599-603.
27. Lambert, R. (2003) Lambert review of business-industry collaboration. Final report, December, HMSO.
28. Lane, P., Koka, B. and Pathak, S. (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31, 4, 833-863.
29. Laukkanen, M. (2003) Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10, 4, 372-382.
30. Lerner, J. (2005) The university and the start-up: lessons from the past two decades. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 2, 49-56.
31. Lin, C., Tan, B. and Chang, S. (2002) The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 102, 6, 300-308.
32. Linsu, K. (1998) Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching up at Hyundai motor. Organization Science, 9, 4, 506-521.
33. Martin, K. (2003) The Cambridge phenomenon revisited: parts one and two: Segal quince Wickstead, Cambridge, UK. Research Policy, 32, 1, 179-180.
34. McAdam, M., Galbraith, B., McAdam, R. and Humphreys, P. (2006) Business processes and networks in university incubators: a review and research agendas. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18, 5, 451-470.
35. Meyer, M. (2003) Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. R & D Management, 33, 2, 107-115.
36. Mosey, S., Lockett, A. and Westhead, P. (2006) Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: the Medici fellowship programme. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18, 1, 71-91.
37. Mosey, S. and Wright, M. (2007) From human capital to social capital: a longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 6, 909-935.
38. Oakey, R. and Mukhter, S. (1999) United kingdom high-technology small firms in theory and practice: a review of recent trends. International Small Business Journal, 17, 1, 7-28.
39. OECD. (2006) Economic Policy Reforms: Going for growth. Structural Policy Indicators and Priorities in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
40. Pries, F. and Guild, P. (2007) Commercial exploitation of new technologies arising from university research: start-ups and markets for technology. R & D Management, 37, 4, 319-333.
41. Prince, C. and Beaver, G. (2007) The challenges of developing commercial activity in new university business schools: alternative approaches. Strategic Change, 16, 303-314.
42. Rasmussen, E., Moen, O. and Gulbrandsen, M. (2006) Initiatives to promote commercialisation of university knowledge. Technovation, 26, 4, 518-533.
43. Renault, C.S. (2006) Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 2, 227-239.
44. Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D. and Jiang, L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691-791.
46. Rothaermel, F.T. and Thursby, M. (2005) Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34, 1076-1090.
47. Shane, S. (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. NY: Edward Elgar.
48. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 1, 27-48.
49. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2004) Managing Innovation - Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Chichester: Wiley.
50. Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007) Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualisation. Academy of Management Review, 32, 3, 774-786.
51. UNICO. (2006) The University Company Association. Available at (accessed August 2007)
52. Wright, M., Birley, S. and Mosey, S. (2004) Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 3, 235-246.
53. Yin, R.K. (2004) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. London: Sage.
54. Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, 185-203.
55. Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R. and Armstrong, J. (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48, 138-153.