Variation in the strength and softness of selection on deleterious mutations

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3232-3241

  Laffafian, Azadeh ^a   King, James D ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deleterious mutations; Hard and soft selection; Mutation load; Population structure

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; MUTATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SELECTION; WILD POPULATION;

ALGORITHM; ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 77958537901     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01062.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agrawal, A. F. 2010. Ecological determinants of mutation load and inbreeding depression in subdivided populations. Am. Nat. 176:111-122.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and J. R. Chasnov 2001. Recessive mutations and the maintenance of sex in structured populations. Genetics 158:913-917.
3. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock 2010. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:450-458.
4. Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine the success in competition of food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Néerl. Zool. 14:200-281.
5. Bolker, B. 2008. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
6. Brooks, S. P., and B. J. T. Morgan 1995. Optimization using simulated annealing. Statistician 44:241-257.
7. Bundgaard, J., and F. B. Christiansen 1972. Dynamics of polymorphisms. I: selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 71:439-460.
8. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes 1999. The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits. Pp. 369-392 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
9. Christiansen, F. B. 1975. Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population. Am. Nat. 109:11-16.
10. Crow, J. F. 1997. The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8380-8386.
11. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, MN
12. Dempster, E. R. 1955. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:25-32.
13. Glémin, S., J. Ronfort, and T. Bataillon 2003. Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics 165:2193-2212.
14. Haag, C. R., and D. Roze 2007. Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance, and genetic drift. Genetics 176:1663-1678.
15. Haldane, J. B. S. 1937. The effect of variation on fitness. Am. Nat. 71:337-349.
16. Holsinger, K. E., and S. W. Pacala 1990. Multiple-niche polymorphism in plant populations. Am. Nat. 135:301-309.
17. Juenger, T., T. Lennartsson, and J. Tuomi 2000. The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evol. Ecol. 14:393-419.
18. Keightley, P. D., and M. Lynch 2003. Toward a realistic model of mutations affecting fitness. Evolution 57:683-685.
19. Keightley, P. D., and S. P. Otto 2006. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443:89-92.
20. Kelly, J. K. 1994. The effect of scale-dependent processes on kin selection-mating and density regulation. Theor. Popul. Biol. 46:32-57.
21. Kelly, J. L., J. R. Stinchcombe, C. Weinig, and J. Schmitt 2005. Soft and hard selection on plant defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7:287-302.
22. Kondrashov, A. S. 1982. Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. Genet. Res. 40:325-332.
23. Kondrashov, A. S., and D. Houle 1994. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258:221-227.
24. Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87:331-333.
25. Lewontin, R. C. 1955. The effects of population density and composition on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 9:27-41.
26. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery 2003. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401-1404.
27. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz, L. Vassilieva, and J. Willis 1999. Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:645-663.
28. Mueller, L. D. 1988. Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:4383-4386.
29. Muller, H. J. 1950. Our load of mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2:111-176.
30. Nicholson, A. J. 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2:9-65.
31. Nicholson, A. J. 1957. The self-adjustment of populations to change. Cold Spring Harbor Sym. Quant. Biol. 22:153-173.
32. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520-521.
33. Price, G. R. 1972. Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann. Human Genet. 35:485-490.
34. Queller, D. C. 1994. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol. Ecol. 8:70-73.
35. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Pp. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Vienna
36. Ravigné, V., I. Olivieri, and U. Dieckmann 2004. Implications of habitat choice for protected polymorphisms. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6:125-145.
37. Rowe, L., and D. Houle 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1415-1421.
38. Roze, D., and F. O. Rousset 2004. Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression and heterosis. Genetics 167:1001-1015.
39. Theodorou, K., and D. Couvet 2006. Genetic load in subdivided populations: interactions between the migration rate, the size and the number of subpopulations. Heredity 96:69-78.
40. Van Tienderen, P. H. 1997. Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in sympatric populations of distinct species. Evolution 51:1372-1380.
41. Wade, M. J. 1985. Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am. Nat. 125:61-73.
42. Wallace, B. 1968. Polymorphism, population size, and genetic load. Pp. 87-108 in R. C. Lewontin, ed. Population biology and evolution. Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse
43. Wallace, B. 1975. Hard and soft selection revisited. Evolution 29:465-473.
44. Wang, A. D., N. P. Sharp, C. C. Spencer, K. Tedman-Aucoin, and A. F. Agrawal 2009. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 174:863-874.
45. Whitlock, M. C. 2002. Selection, load, and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation. Genetics 160:1191-1202.
46. Yang, H. P., A. Y. Tanikawa, W. A. Van Voorhies, J. C. Silva, and A. S. Kondrashov 2001. Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 157:1257-1265.