Online shopping viewed from a habit and value perspective

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 621-632

  Pahnila, Seppo ^a   Warsta, Juhani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

affect; e commerce; habit; social factors; Triandis; value

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; E-COMMERCE; HABIT; SOCIAL FACTOR; TRIANDIS; VALUE;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 77958521255     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.501115     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aarts, H., Paulussen, T., and Schaalma, H., 1997. Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours. Health Education Research, 12 (3), 363-374.
2. Agresti, A., 1990. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Ajzen, I., 2002. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1-20.
4. Aydin, C.E. and Rice, R.E., 1991. Social worlds, individual differences, and implementation. Predicting attitudes toward a medical information system. Information and Management, 20, 119-136.
5. Babin, B. and Attaway, J., 2000. Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer. Journal of Business Research, 49, 91-99.
6. Babin, B., Darden, W., and Griffin, M., 1994. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644-656.
7. Bellman, S., Lohse, G., and Johnson, E., 1999. Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42 (12), 32-38.
8. Bloch, P., Sherrell, D., and Ridgway, N., 1986. Consumer search: an extended framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 119-126.
9. Boudreau, M.-C. and Gefen, D., 2001. Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 1-16.
10. Bridges, E. and Florsheim, R., 2008. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: the online experience. Journal of Business Research, 61, 309-314.
11. Bruner II, G. and Kumar, A., 2005. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58, 553-558.
12. Butz, H. Jr and Goodstein, L., 1996. Measuring customer value: gaining the strategic advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24 (3 Winter), 63-77.
13. Cheung, C.M.K. and Limayem, M., 2005. The role of habit in information systems continuance: examining the evolving relationship between intention and usage. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2005, 11-14 December. Las Vegas, NV, USA. Association for Information Systems.
14. Childers, T., et al, 2001. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511-535.
15. Chin, W. and Newsted, P., 1999. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: R. Hoyle, ed. Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Collins, C., Steg, L., and Koning, A., 2007. Customer's values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 24 (6), 555-577.
17. Compeau, R.D. and Higgins, A.C., 1995. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189-211.
18. Cronbach, L., 1950. Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3-31.
19. Davis, D.F., Bagozzi, P.R., and Warshaw, R.P., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.
20. Eggert, A. and Ulaga, W., 2002. Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets? Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17 (2/3), 107-118.
21. Fiore, A., Kim, J., and Lee, H., 2005. Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 38-53. (Pubitemid 41366497)
22. Fishbein, M., 1980. A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 65-116.
23. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Fornell, C. and Larcker, F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
25. Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M.-C., 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: guideline for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 7 (7), 1-78.
26. Hair, J.F. Jr., et al., 1998. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
27. Hair, J.F. Jr., et al., 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
28. Heijden van der, H., 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28 (4), 695-704.
29. Jones, M., Reynolds, K., and Arnold, M., 2006. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59, 974-981.
30. Kaltcheva, V. and Weitz, B., 2006. When should a retailer create an exciting store environment? Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 107-118.
31. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L., 1999. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 183-213.
32. Keeney, R., 1999. The value of internet commerce to the customer. Management Science, 45 (4), 533-542.
33. Kim, Y. and Srivastava, J., 2007. Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on electronic commerce (ICEE '07), Minneapolis, MN, USA. New York: ACM, 293-301.
34. Kleijnen, M., de Ruyter, K., and Wetzels, M., 2007. An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of Retailing, 83 (1), 33-46.
35. Kline, R.B., 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
36. Komorita, S. and Graham, W., 1965. Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, XXV, 987-995.
37. Kurki, S., Tuunainen, V., and Öörni, A., 2007. Consumer value in electronic retailing: a laboratory experiment in buying cloths. In: H. Osterle, J. Schelp, and R. Winter, eds. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, University of St Gallen, Switzerland, 1-12.
38. Limayem, M. and Hirt, S.G., 2003. Force of habit and information systems usage: theory and initial validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 65-97.
39. Limayem, M., Khalifa, M., and Frini, A., 2000. What makes consumers buy from internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 421-432.
40. Lumpkin, G. and Dess, G., 2004. E-business strategies and internet business models: how the internet adds value. Organizational Dynamics, 33 (2), 161-173.
41. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., and Rigdon, E., 2001. Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77, 39-56.
42. Mattel, M. and Jacoby, J., 1971. Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: reliabilty and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657-674.
43. Morahan-Martin, J. and Schumacher, P., 2000. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13-29.
44. Noble, S., Griffith, D., and Weinberger, M., 2005. Consumer derived utilitarian value and channel utilization in a multi-channel retail context. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1643-1651.
45. Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
46. Overby, J. and Lee, E.-J., 2006. The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1160-1166.
47. Rasmussen, J., 1989. Analysis of likert-scale data: a reinterpretention of gregoire and driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167-170.
48. Ringle, C. and Wende, S., 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. University of Hamburg, Germany.
49. Senecal, S., Gharbi, J.-E., and Nantel, J., 2002. The influence of flow on hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 483-484.
50. Simon, J. and Bruce, P., 1991. Resampling: a tool for everyday statistical work. Change: New Directions for Statistics and Computing, 4, 22-32.
51. Stoel, L., Wickliffe, V., and Lee, K., 2004. Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1067-1073.
52. Straub, D.W., 1989. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13 (2), 147-169.
53. Triandis, H.C., 1980. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska symposium on motivation 1979. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 195-259.
54. Venkatesh, V., et al, 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
55. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., and Knippenberg van, A., 1997. Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 539-560.
56. Woodruff, R., 1997. Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 139-153.
57. Zeithaml, V., 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 2-22.