Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-5

  Schulte, John ^a   Flores, Arturo M ^a   Weed, Meghan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; ODONTOMETRY; PERIODONTIUM; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT;

COHORT STUDIES; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ODONTOMETRY; PERIAPICAL TISSUE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 34447266635     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60031-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 8th ed. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 28
2. Schillingburg H., Hobo S., Whitsett L., Jacobi R., and Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. (1997), Quintessence, Chicago 89-90
3. th ed. (2006), Elsevier, St. Louis 42-81
4. Car A., McGivney G., and Brown D. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. 11th ed. (2004), Elsevier, St. Louis 189-229
5. McGuire M., and Nunn M. Prognosis versus actual outcome III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival. J Periodontol 67 (1996) 666-674
6. Gilbert G., Shelton B., Chavers L., and Bradford Jr. E. Predicting tooth loss during a population-based study: role of attachment level in the presence of other dental conditions. J Periodontol 73 (2002) 1427-1436
7. Mericske-Stern R. Overdentures with roots or implants for elderly patients: a comparison. J Prosthet Dent 72 (1994) 543-550
8. Grunder U., Polizzi G., Goene R., Hatano H., Henry P., Jackson W., et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 (1999) 210-216
9. Snauwaert K., Duyck J., van Steenberghe D., Quirynen M., and Naert I. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: A 15-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig 4 (2000) 13-20
10. Friberg B., Jemt T., and Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6 (1991) 142-146
11. van Steenberghe D., Lekholm U., Bolender C., Folmer T., Henry P., Herrmann I., et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitaion of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 588 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 (1990) 272-281
12. Teixeira E., Wadamoto M., Akagawa Y., and Kimoto T. Clinical application of short hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants to the posterior mandible: a five-year survival study. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 166-171
13. Rokni S., Todescan R., Watson P., Pharoah M., Adegbembo A., and Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 (2005) 69-76
14. Renouard F., and Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 Suppl 1 (2005) S104-S110
15. Feldman S., Boitel N., Weng D., Kohles S., and Stach R. Five-year survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined-surfaced and Osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6 (2004) 16-23
16. ten Bruggenkate C., Asikainen P., Foitzik C., Krekeler G., and Sutter F. Short (6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 791-798
17. Tawil G., and Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 (2003) 894-901
18. Gentile M., Chuang S., and Dodson T. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 (2005) 930-937
19. Langlais R., Rodriguez I., and Maselle I. Principles of radiographic selection and interpretation. Dent Clin North Am 38 (1994) 1-12
20. nd ed. (1992), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 51-57