Cast shadow can modulate the judged final position of a moving target

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1930-1937

  Taya, Shuichiro ^a   Miura, Kayo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 77958483657     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1930     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Finke, R. A., Freyd, J. J., & Shyi, G. C. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.175
2. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 126-132. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.126
3. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 443-446.
4. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
5. Hubbard, T. L. (1993). The effect of context on visual representational momentum. Memory & Cognition, 21, 103-114.
6. Hubbard, T. L. (1994). Judged displacement: A modular process? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 359-373.
7. Hubbard, T. L. (1995a). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 241-254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.241
8. Hubbard, T. L. (1995b). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
9. Hubbard, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1484-1493. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1484
10. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
11. Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Bridging the gap: Possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicológica, 27, 1-34.
12. Hubbard, T. L., & Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
13. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (1999). Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 242-256.
14. Imura, T., Shirai, N., Tomonaga, M., Yamaguchi, M. K., & Yagi, A. (2008). Asymmetry in the perception of motion in depth induced by moving cast shadows. Journal of Vision, 8(13, Art. 10), 1-8. doi:10.1167/8.13.10
15. Imura, T., Yamaguchi, M. K., Kanazawa, S., Shirai, N., Otsuka, Y., Tomonaga, M., & Yagi, A. (2006). Perception of motion trajectory of object from the moving cast shadow in infants. Vision Research, 46, 652-657. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.028
16. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Knill, D. C. (1997). Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception, 26, 171-192.
17. Kerzel, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40, 3703-3715. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00226-1
18. Kerzel, D. (2002). Memory for the position of stationary objects: Disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research, 42, 159-167. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00274-7
19. Kerzel, D. (2003a). Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: Irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion. Cognition, 88, 109-131.
20. Kerzel, D. (2003b). Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research, 43, 2623-2635. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00466-8
21. Kerzel, D. (2005). Representational momentum beyond internalized physics: Embodied mechanisms of anticipation cause errors in visual short-term memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 180-184.
22. Kerzel, D. (2006). Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 166-173.
23. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2003). Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system, Current Biology, 13, 1975-1978. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.054
24. Kerzel, D., Jordan, J. S., & Müsseler, J. (2001). The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 829-840. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.829
25. Mamassian, P., Knill, D. C., & Kersten, D. (1998). The perception of cast shadows. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 288-295. doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(98)01204-2
26. Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 120-138. doi:10.1080/13506280143000359
27. Nagai, M., Kazai, K., & Yagi, A. (2002). Larger forward memory displacement in the direction of gravity. Visual Cognition, 9, 28-40. doi:10.1080/13506280143000304
28. Nagai, M., & Saiki, J. (2005). Illusory motion and representational momentum. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 855-866.
29. Nagai, M., & Yagi, A. (2001). The pointedness effect on representational momentum. Memory & Cognition, 29, 91-99.
30. Ryan, T. A. (1960). Significance test for multiple comparisons of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 318-328.
31. Shirai, N., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2004). Asymmetry in the perception of motion-in-depth. Vision Research, 44, 1003-1011. doi:10.1016/ j.visres.2003.07.012
32. Takeuchi, T. (1997). Visual search of expansion and contraction. Vision Research, 37, 2083-2090. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00225-8
33. Uddin, M. K., Kawabe, T., & Nakamizo, S. (2005). Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias. Vision Research, 45, 3301-3306. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.006
34. Verfaillie, K., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1991). Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 302-313. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.302