Relevance and barriers of physician empathy in daily practice current state of research and qualitative survey of physicians;Bedeutung und Barrieren ärztlicher Empathie im Praxisalltag Stand der Forschung und qualitative Kurzumfrage mit Ärzten

Rehabilitation

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 326-337

  Neumann, M ^a   Scheffer, C ^a   Langler A ^a,b   Tauschel, D ^a   Joos, S ^c   Lutz, G ^b   Edelhauser F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

barriers; patient physician interaction; physician empathy; rehabilitation; relevance

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958481584     PISSN: 00343536     EISSN: 14391309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1263159     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer S, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: A structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 2007 69 63-75
2. Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract 2002 52 S9-S13
3. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H. Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Messinstruments Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) am Beispiel von Krebspatienten. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2008 58 5-15
4. Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer SW, Ernstmann N, Pfaff H. Analyzing the nature and specific effectiveness of clinician empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns 2009 74 339-346
5. Squier RW. A model of empathic understanding and adherence to treatment regimens in practitioner-patient-relationships. Soc Sci Med 1990 30 325-329
6. Maguire P, Faulkner A, Booth K, Elliot C, Hiller V. Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. Eur J Cancer Care 1996 32A 78-81
7. Coulehan J, Platt F, Egner B, Frankel R, Lin C, Lown B, Salazar W. Let me see if I have this right words that build empathy. Ann Intern Med 2001 135 221-227
8. Beckman HB, Frankel RM. Training practitioners to communicate effectively in cancer care: it is the relationship that counts. Patient Educ Couns 2003 50 85-89
9. Larson EB, Yao Y. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 2005 293 1100-1106
10. Halpern J. From detached concern to empathy. Humanizing medical practice. Oxford Oxford University Press 2001
11. Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med 1984 101 692-696
12. Irving P, Dickson D. Empathy: towards a conceptual framework for health professionals. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2004 17 212-220
13. Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof 2004 27 237-251
14. Price S, Mercer SW, MacPherson H. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: A prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Educ Couns 2006 63 239-245
15. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam S, Lipkin MJ, Stiles W, Inui T. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997 277 350-356
16. Nightingale SD, Yarnold PR, Greenberg MS. Sympathy, empathy, and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. J Gen Intern Med 1991 (6) 420-423
17. Levinson W, Gorawa-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient cues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA 2000 284 1021-1027
18. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell MW, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ 1999 319 738-743
19. MacPherson H, Mercer SW, Scullion T, Thomas KJ. Empathy, enablement, and outcome. J Altern Complement Med 2003 9 869-876
20. Bikker AP, Mercer SW, Reilly D. A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. J Altern Complement Med 2005 11 591-600
21. Rakel DP, Hoeft TJ, Barrett BP, Chewning BA, Craig BM, Niu M. Practitioner empathy and the duration of the common cold. Fam Med 2009 41 494-501
22. Gerdes N. Ziele und Ablauf des Rehabilitationsprozesses. In: Morfeld M Mau W Jaeckel WH Koch U Hrsg. Rehabilitation, Physikalische Medizin und Naturheilverfahren. München Urban & Fischer 2007 35-43
23. Morfeld M, Koch U. Einführung in die Rehabilitation. In: Morfeld M Mau W Jaeckel WH Koch U Hrsg. Rehabilitation, Physikalische Medizin und Naturheilverfahren. München Urban & Fischer 2007 1-3
24. Koch LC, McReynolds C, Rumrill PD. Basic counseling skills. In: Chan F Berven NL Thomas KR Hrsg. Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation health professionals. New York Springer 2004 227-243
25. Dibbelt S, Schaidhammer M, Fleischer C, Greitemann B. Patient-doctor interaction in rehabilitation: The relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results. Patient Educ Couns 2009 76 328-335
26. Kim SS, Park BK. Patient-perceived communication styles of physicians in rehabilitation. Journal Title: The effect on patient satisfaction and compliance in Korea. Am J Phy Med Rehabil 2008 87 998-1005
27. Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, Soukup J, ODay B. Quality dimensions that most concern people with physical and sensory disabilities. Arch Intern Med 2003 163 2085-2092
28. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients motivation for rehabilitation. Brit Med J 2000 321 1051-1054
29. Neumann M, Galushko M, Pfaff H. Qualitative Evaluation der psychoonkologischen Versorgung von Haus LebensWert e.V. Köln Medizinische Fakultät der Universität zu Köln 2006
30. Neumann M, Galushko M, Karbach U, Goldblatt H, Visser A, Wirtz M, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H. Barriers to using psycho-oncological services: a qualitative research into the perspectives of users, their relatives, non-users, physicians, and nurses. Supp Care Cancer 2009 DOI 10.1007/s00520-009-0731-2
31. von Kardoff E. Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. In: Flick U von Kardoff E Steinke I Hrsg. Qualitative Forschung. Hamburg rowohlt 2005 238-250
32. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park Sage 1990
33. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ John Wiley 2008
34. Flick U. Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Hamburg rowohlt 1998
35. Lamnek S. Gruppendiskussion. Theorie und Praxis. Weinheim Beltz 2005
36. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Flick U von Kardoff E Steinke I Hrsg. Qualitative Forschung. Hamburg rowohlt 2005
37. Beale AV, Payton OD, Zachary IG. The effects of a communications course for health professionals on empathy discrimination. J Appl Rehab Couns 1978 9 46-49
38. Day HI, Chambers J. Empathy and burnout in rehabilitation counselors. Can J Rehab 1991 5 33-44
39. Georgianna SL, McDonald J. The role of empathy in the rehabilitation process. Am Arch Rehab Ther 1984 32 1-4
40. Grand SA, Stockin BC. The effects of group psychotherapy on rehabilitation counselor trainee's empathy. Rehab Couns Bull 1970 14 36-41
41. Halstead L. The power of compassion and caring in rehabilitation healing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 149-154
42. Herrmann M, Johannsen-Horbach H, Wallesch C. Empathy and aphasia rehabilitation are there contradictory requirements of treatment and psychological support? Aphasiology 1993 7 575-579
43. Kirk WC, Best JB, Irwin P. The perception of empathy in alcoholism counselors. J Studies Alco 1985 47 82-84
44. Martin P, Wardle S. Experiential tasks for understanding head injury. J Cognitive Rehab 1993 11 6-8
45. McKay JK, Dowd ET, Rollin SA. Effects of rehabilitation counselor disability status on similarly disabled clients perceptions of counselor social influence and empathy. J Appl Rehab Couns 1982 13 10-13
46. Robertson EK, Suinn RM. The determination of rate of progress of stroke patients through empathy measures of patient and family. J Psychosom Res 1968 12 189-191
47. Wegener ST. The rehabilitation ethic and ethics. Rehab Psychol 1996 41 5-17
48. Davis M. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 1980 10 85-86
49. Davis M. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Person Soc Psychol 1983 44 1114-1126
50. Davis MH. Empathy. A social psychological approach. Boulder Westview 1996
51. Neumann M, Edelhaeuser F, Tauschel D, Scheffer C. Ärztliche Empathie: Definition, therapeutische Wirksamkeit und Messung. In: Witt C Hrsg. Was macht einen guten Arzt aus? Ergebnisse einer interdisziplinären Konferenz. Juventa 2010 (im Druck)
52. Pedersen R. Empirical research on empathy in medicine A critical review. Pat Educ Couns 2009 76 307-322
53. Hemmendinger JM, Stoddort S, Lilford RA. A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Med Educ 2007 7 1-8
54. Neumann M. Ärztliche Empathie: Messung, Determinanten und patient-reported Outcomes Eine explorative Querschnittstudie aus der Sicht von Patienten mit Bronchial-, Ösophagus-, Kolorektal-, Mamma-, Prostata- und Hautkarzinom. Dissertation. Köln Universität zu Köln 2008.