Patient-doctor interaction in rehabilitation: The relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 328-335

  Dibbelt, Susanne ^a   Schaidhammer, Monika ^a   Fleischer, Christian ^b   Greitemann, Bernhard ^a  

^a Klinik Muensterland   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Patient physician communication; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPATHY; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT ARTZ INTERAKTION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 68849130911     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Roter D.L., Hall J.A., Katz N.R., Stewart M.A., and Roter D. Communicating with medical patients (1989), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
2. Stewart M., Brown J.B., Boon H., Galajda J., Meredith L., and Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control (1999) 25-30
3. Di Blasi Z., Harkness E., Ernst E., Georgiu A., and Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 357 (2001) 757-762
4. Griffin S.J., Kinmonth A.L., Veltman M.W.M., Gillard S., Grant J., and Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Family Med 2 (2004) 595-608
5. Dasinger L.K., Krause N., Thompson P.J., Brabd R.J., and Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return-to-work-recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 43 (2001) 515-525
6. Bensing J.M. Doctor patient communication and the quality of care (1990), NIVEL, Utrecht
7. Rogers C.R. Die nicht direktive Beratung München: Kindler Studienausgabe [Counselling and psychotherapy, 1942] (1972), Boston
8. Fleischer C. Arzt-Patienten-Interaktion als Beitrag zur Qualitätssicherung in Reha-Kliniken [Doctor-patient-interaction as a contribution to quality assurance in rehabilitation clinics] (2006), Diplomarbeit im Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften, Fach Psychologie der Universität Osnabrück [Diplomathesis in the Department of Human sciences, Psychology, University of Osnabrueck]
9. Dibbelt S., Fleischer C., Schaidhammer M., and Greitemann B. Der P.A.INT- Fragebogen zur Kontaktbewertung: Ein Instrument zur Erfassung der Qualität der Patienten-Arzt-Interaktion aus zwei Perspektiven [The P.A.INT-Questionnaire of contact evaluation: an instrument to survey the quality of patient-doctor-interaction from two perspectives]. 16. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium in Berlin [16th congress on rehabilitation research, Berlin], DRV-Schriften (2007) [Writings of the German Federal Pension Fund]
10. Dibbelt S. Patienten-Arzt-Interaktion in der Rehabilitation: Wie bewerten Ärzte und Patienten die gemeinsamen Gespräche? [Patient-doctor-interaction in rehabilitation: how doctors and patients do evaluate their shared dialogues?]. Orthopädische Praxis [Orthop Practice] 43 (2007) 535-538
11. Bührlen B., Gerdes N., and Jäckel W.H. Entwicklung und psychometrische Testung eines Patientenfragebogens für die medizinische Rehabilitation (IRES-3) [Development and Psychometric Testing of a Patient Questionnaire for Medical Rehabilitation (IRES-3)]. Rehabilitation 44 (2005) 63-74
12. Dibbelt S., Greitemann B., and Büschel C. Nachhaltigkeit orthopädischer Rehabilitation bei chronischen Rückenschmerzen - Das integrierte Orthopädisch-Psychosomatische Behandlungskonzept (IopKo) [Long-term efficiency of orthopedic rehabilitation in chronic back pain-The Integrative Orthopedic Psychosomatic Concept (IopKo)]. Rehabilitation 45 (2006) 324-335
13. Bensing J., Van Dulmen S., and Tates K. Communication in context: new directions in communication research. Patient Educ Couns 50 (2003) 27-32
14. Roter D., and Larson S. The roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 46 (2002) 243-251
15. Simon D., Loh A., and Härter M. Messung der Partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung [The assessment of shared decision-making]. In: Härter M., Loh A., and Spies C. (Eds). Gemeinsam entscheiden - erfolgreich behandeln. Neue Wege für Ärzte und Patienten im Gesundheitswesen [Shared decision-successful treatment. New ground for physicians and patients in public health] (2005), Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag [Deutscher Aerzte-Verlag]
16. Fuchs T., Sidiropoulou E., Vennen D., and Fisseni H.J. Bonner Fragebogen für Therapie und Beratung [The Bonn Questionnaire for psychotherapy and consulting] (2003), Hogrefe, Goettingen [Göttingen]
17. Steine S., Finset A., and Laerum E. A new brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract 18 (2001) 410-418
18. Hartmann A., and Herzog T. Varianten der Effektstärken-Berechnung in Meta-Analysen: Kommt es zu variablen Ergebnissen? (Variants of effect size calculations: do they produce different solutions?. Z Klin Psychol (J Clin Psycho Psychother) 24 4 (1995) 337-343
19. Schwarzer R. Psychologie des Gesundheitsverhaltens Einfuehrung in die Gesundheitspsychologie [Psychology of health behavior. introduction to the psychology of health]. 3rd revised edition (2004), Hogrefe, Goettingen [Göttingen]
20. Kuhl J., Kazén M., and Koole S.L. Putting self-regulation theory into practice: A user's manual. Appl Psychol Int Rev 55 (2006) 408-418
21. Kanfer, HK, Reinecker, H, Schmelzer, D. Selbstmanagement-Therapie: Ein Lehrbuch für die klinische Praxis (Gebundene Ausgabe, 4. Auflage) 2006 [selfmanagement therapy: A textbook for the clinical practice (hardback 4rth edition)]. Heidelberg: Springer.
22. Dibbelt S. Patienten-Arzt-Interaktion: Auch ein "Schicht"-Problem? [Patient-doctor-interaction: is it a problem of social stratum?]. Der Bauchredner (The ventriloquist) DCCV-Journal [J German Soc Chronic Gastro-intest Dis] 90 3 (2007) 54-57
23. Bieber C., Müller K.G., Blumenstiel K., Bludau H.B., Hochlehnert A., Richter A., et al. Erfassung der Effekte gemeinsamer Therapieentscheidung bei der Behandlung chronischer Schmerzpatienten - Der Patient als Partner im medizinischen Entscheidungsprozeß [The survey of effects of shared decision at the treatment of patients with chronic pain. The patient as partner in the medical decision process]. In: Scheibler F., and Pfaff H. (Eds). Der Patient als Partner im medizinischen Entscheidungsprozess-shared decision-making [The patient as partner in the medical decision process-shared decision-making] (2003), Weinheim, Juventa 203-213
24. Glattacker M., Dudeck A., Gustke M., Dibbelt S., Schaidhammer-Placke M., Greitemann B., et al. Zielvereinbarungen in der Rehabilitation von PatientInnen mit Diabetes mellitus [Target agreements in rehabilitation with patients with diabetes mellitus]. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation [Practice of clinical behavior medicine and rehabilitation] (2009)
25. Willems S., De Maesschalck S., Deveugele M., Derese A., and De Maeseneer J. Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?. Patient Educ Couns 56 (2005) 139-146