Group dynamics of zebra and wildebeest in a woodland savanna: Effects of predation risk and habitat density

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1-6

  Thaker, Maria ^a   Vanak, Abi T ^a   Owen, Cailey R ^a,b   Ogden, Monika B ^b   Slotow, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^b Karongwe Ecological Research Institute   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORAGING; FOREST; GROUP DYNAMICS; HABITAT SELECTION; LANDSCAPE; LION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; RISK REDUCTION; SAVANNA; SCRUB; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DOMINANCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNGULATE; VEGETATION; ANIMAL; BOVIDS; ECOSYSTEM; HORSE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SOUTH AFRICA; WILD ANIMAL;

CONNOCHAETES TAURINUS; EQUUS BURCHELLII; EQUUS SUBG. HIPPOTIGRIS; PANTHERA LEO; UNGULATA;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; ECOSYSTEM; EQUIDAE; FEMALE; LIONS; MALE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RUMINANTS; SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 77958462210     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012758     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Creel S, Winnie JA (2005) Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Behaviour 69: 1181-1189.
3. Galef BG, Giraldeau LA (2001) Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Animal Behaviour 61: 3-15.
4. Fernández-Juricic E, Gilak N, McDonald JC, Pithia P, Valcarcel A (2006) A dynamic method to study the transmission of social foraging information in flocks using robots. Animal Behaviour 71: 901-911.
5. Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Bear GD, Bowden DC (1996) Ungulate grazing in sagebrush grassland: mechanisms of resource competition. Ecological Applications 6: 200-217.
6. Fortin D, Boyce MS, Merrill EH (2004) Multi-tasking by mammalian herbivores: overlapping processes during foraging. Ecology 85: 2312-2322.
7. Pays O, Benhamou S, Helder R, Gerard JF (2007) The dynamics of group formation in large mammalian herbivores: an analysis in the European roe deer. Animal Behaviour 74: 1429-1441.
8. Fortin D, Fortin ME, Beyer HL, Duchesne T, Courant S, et al. (2009) Groupsize- mediated habitat selection and group fusion-fission dynamics of bison under predation risk. Ecology 90: 2480-2490.
9. Parrish JK (1993) Comparison of the hunting behavior of four piscine predators attacking schooling prey. Ethology 95: 233-246.
10. Scheel D (1993) Profitability, encounter rates, and prey choice of African lions. Behavioral Ecology 4: 90-97.
11. Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48: 215-267.
12. Owen-Smith N (2008) Changing vulnerability to predation related to season and sex in an African ungulate assemblage. Oikos 117: 602-610.
13. FitzGibbon CD (1990) Why do hunting cheetahs prefer male gazelles? Animal Behaviour 40: 837-845.
14. Molinari-Jobin A, Molinari P, Loison A, Gaillard J, Breitenmoser U (2004) Life cycle period and activity of prey influence their susceptibility to predators. Ecography 27: 323-329.
15. Hill R, Lee P (1998) Predation risk as an influence on group size in cercopithecoid primates: implications for social structure. Journal of Zoology 245: 447-456.
16. Krause J, Hoare D, Croft D, Lawrence J, Ward A, et al. (2000) Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267: 2011-2017.
17. Ranta E, Peuhkuri N, Laurila A (1994) A theoretical explanation of antipredator and foraging factors promoting phenotype-assorted fish schools. Ecoscience 1: 99-106.
18. Fryxell JM (1995) Aggregation and migration by grazing ungulates in relation to resources and predators. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P, eds. Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp 257-273.
19. Thaker M, Vanak A, Owen C, Ogden M, Niemann S, et al. (In press) Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates. Ecology:[doi:10.1890/1810-0126. 1891].
20. Lehmann MB, Funston PJ, Owen CR, Slotow R (2008) Feeding behaviour of lions (Panthera leo) on a small reserve. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 38: 66-78.
21. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
22. Hirst SM (1969) Road-strip census techniques for wild ungulates in African woodland. Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 40-48.
23. Garton EO, Wisdom MJ, Leban FA, Johnson BK (2001) Experimental design for radiotelemetry studies. In: Millspaugh JJ, ed. Radio tracking and animal populations. San Diego: Academic Press. pp 16-42.
24. Lehmann MB, Funston PJ, Owen CR, Slotow R (2008) Home range utilisation and territorial behaviour of lions (Panthera leo) on Karongwe Game Reserve, South Africa. PLoS ONE 3: e3998.
25. Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ (2006) Bandwidth selection for fixedkernel analysis of animal utilization distributions. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 1334-1344.
26. Rodgers AR, Carr AP, Beyer HL, Smith L, Kie JG (2007) HRT: Home Range Tools for ArcGIS. Version 1.1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
27. Millspaugh JJ, Nielson RM, McDonald L, Marzluff JM, Gitzen RA, et al. (2006) Analysis of resource selection using utilization distributions. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 384-395.
28. Cherry S (1996) A comparison of confidence interval methods for habitat useavailability studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 60: 653-658.
29. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Ebensperger L, Wallem P (2002) Grouping increases the ability of the social rodent, Octodon degus, to detect predators when using exposed microhabitats. Oikos 98: 491-497.
31. Spieler M (2003) Risk of predation affects aggregation size: a study with tadpoles of Phrynomantis microps (Anura: Microhylidae). Animal Behaviour 65: 179-184.
32. Valeix M, Fritz H, Loveridge AJ, Davidson Z, Hunt JE, et al. (2009) Does the risk of encountering lions influence African herbivore behaviour at waterholes? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 1483-1494.
33. Cresswell W, Quinn JL (2004) Faced with a choice, sparrowhawks more often attack the more vulnerable prey group. Oikos 104: 71-76.
34. Hebblewhite M, Pletscher D (2002) Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 800-809.
35. Krause J, Godin J-GJ (1995) Predator preferences for attacking particular prey group sizes: consequences for predator hunting success and prey predation risk. Animal Behaviour 50: 465-473.
36. Gude J, Garrott R, Borkowski J, King F (2006) Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem. Ecological Applications 16: 285-298.
37. Hopcraft J, Sinclair A, Packer C (2005) Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 559-566.
38. Funston P, Mills M, Biggs H (2001) Factors affecting the hunting success of male and female lions in the Kruger National Park. Journal of Zoology 253: 419-431.
39. Redfern JV, Ryan SJ, Getz WM (2006) Defining herbivore assemblages in the Kruger National Park: a correlative coherence approach. Oecologia 146: 632-640.
40. Estes RD (1991) The behavior guide to African mammals, including hoofed mammals, carnivores, primates. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Owen-Smith N (2002) Adaptive Herbivore Ecology. From resources to populations in variable environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Neuhaus P, Ruckstuhl KE (2002) The link between sexual dimorphism, activity budgets, and group cohesion: the case of the plains zebra (Equus burchelli). Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 1437-1441.
43. Lett C, Auger P, Gaillard JM (2004) Continuous cycling of grouped vs. solitary strategy frequencies in a predator-prey model. Theoretical Population Biology 65: 263-270.
44. Fischhoff I, Sundaresan S, Cordingley J, Rubenstein D (2007) Habitat use and movements of plains zebra (Equus burchelli) in response to predation danger from lions. Behavioral Ecology 18: 725.
45. Kauffman MJ, Varley N, Smith DW, Stahler DR, MacNulty DR, et al. (2007) Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator-prey system. Ecology Letters 10: 690-700.