Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: Evidence for multiple generation mechanisms

Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

Volumn 194, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 665-683

  Bergevin, Christopher ^a,b   Freeman, Dennis M ^c   Saunders, James C ^d   Shera, Christopher A ^e,f  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chicken; Frog; Lizard; Non mammal; OAE

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIRD; COCHLEA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FROG; HEARING; HUMAN; LIZARD; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BIRDS; COCHLEA; HUMANS; LIZARDS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RANA PIPIENS;

EID: 46649110092     PISSN: 03407594     EISSN: 14321351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0338-y     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aranyosi AJ, Freeman DM (2004) Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles. Biophys J 87(5):3536-3546
2. Boyev KP, Liberman MC, Brown MC (2002) Effects of anesthesia on efferent-mediated adaptation of the DPOAE. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3(3):362-373
3. Brass D, Kemp DT (1993) Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 93(2):920-939
4. Brown AM, Kemp DT (1983) An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal. In: deBoer E, Viergever MA (eds) Mechanics of hearing. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 75-82
5. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, Ribaupierre YD (1985) Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 227:194-196
6. Chen L, Salvi R, Shero M (1994) Cochlear frequency-place map in adult chickens: intracellular biocytin labeling. Hear Res 81(1):130-136
7. Coro F, Kössl M (1998) Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from the tympanic organ in two noctuoid moths. J Comp Physiol A 183:525-531
8. Coro F, Kössl M (2001) Components of the 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in a moth. Hear Res 162:126-133
9. Cotanche DA (1987) Regeneration of the tectorial membrane in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 30:197-206
10. Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) (1996) The cochlea. Springer, New York
11. Eatock RA, Manley GA, Pawson L (1981) Auditory nerve fiber activity in the gecko. I. Implications for cochlear processing. J Comp Physiol A 142:203-218
12. Ferber-Viart C, Savourey G, Garcia C, Duclaux R, Bittel J, Collet L (1995) Influence of hyperthermia on cochlear micromechanical properties in humans. Hear Res 91(1-2):202-207
13. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de S RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 297:1-370
14. Ghaffari R, Aranyosi AJ, Freeman DM (2007) Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(42):16510-16515
15. Glasberg BR, Moore BC (2000) Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. J Acoust Soc Am 108(5):2318-2328
16. Goodman SS, Withnell RH, Shera CA (2003) The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig. Hear Res 183:7-17
17. Gummer AW, Smolders JWT, Klinke R (1987) Basilar membrance motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique. Hear Res 29:63-92
18. He DZ, Beisel KW, Chen L, Ding DL, Jia S, Fritzsch B, Salvi R (2003) Chick hair cells do not exhibit voltage-dependent somatic motility. J Physiol 546(2):511-520
19. Hellmann B, Fritzsch B (1996) Neuroanatomical and histochemical evidence for the presence of common lateral line and inner ear efferents and of efferents to the basilar papilla in a frog, Xenopus laevis. Brain Behav Evol 47:185-194
20. Hillery CM, Narins PM (1984) Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear. Science 225:1037-1039
21. Ipakchi R, Kyin T, Saunders JC (2005) Loss and recovery of sound-evoked otoacoustic emissions in young chicks following acoustic trauma. Audiol Neurootol 10(4):209-219
22. Kemp DT (1986) Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 22:95-104
23. Kennedy HJ, Evans MG, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2006) Depolarization of cochlear outer hair cells evokes active hair bundle motion by two mechanisms. J Neurosci 26(10):2757-2766
24. Kettembeil S, Manley GA, Siegl E (1995) Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anesthesia sensitivity in the European starling and the chicken. Hear Res 86:47-62
25. 2 area study. J Acoust Soc Am 107(1):457-473
26. Köppl C (1995) Otoacoustic emissions as an indicator for active cochlear mechanics: a primitive property of vertebrate auditory organs. In: Manley GA et al (eds) Advances in hearing research. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 207-218
27. Köppl C, Forge A, Manley GA (2004) Low density of membrane particles in auditory hair cells of lizards and birds suggests an absence of somatic motility. J Comp Neurol 479(2):149-155
28. Kössl M, Boyan GS (1998) Acoustic distortion products from the ear of a grasshopper. J Acoust Soc Am 104(1):326-335
29. Lewis ER, Leverenz EL (1983) Morphological basis for tonotopy in the anuran amphibian papilla. Scan Electron Microsc 1:189-200
30. Lewis ER, Leverenz EL, Koyama H (1982) The tonotopic organization of the bullfrog amphibian papilla, an auditory organ lacking a basilar membrane. J Comp Physiol A 145:437-445
31. Liberman MC, Zuo J, Guinan JJ (2004) Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?. J Acoust Soc Am 116(3):1649-1655
32. Lichtenhan JT, Chertoff ME, Smittkamp SE, Durham D, Girod DA (2005) Predicting severity of cochlear hair cell damage in adult chickens using DPOAE input-output functions. Hear Res 201(1-2):109-120
33. Long GR, Talmadge CL (2007) DPOAE fine structure changes at higher stimulus levels-evidence for a nonlinear reflection component. In: Nuttall AL et al (eds) Auditory mechanisms: processes and models. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 287-293
34. Manley GA (1990) Peripheral hearing mechanisms in reptiles and birds. Springer, Berlin
35. Manley GA, Köppl C (1994) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. III: temperature effects. Hear Res 72(1-2):171-180
36. Manley GA, Brix J, Kaiser A (1987) Developmental stability of the tonotopic organization of the chick's basilar papilla. Science 237:655-656
37. Manley GA, Yates GK, Köppl C (1988) Auditory peripheral tuning: evidence for a simple resonance phenomenon in the lizard Tiliqua. Hear Res 33:181-190
38. Manley GA, Köppl C, Johnstone BM (1993) Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I: general characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 93(5):2820-2833
39. Manley GA, Gallo L, Köppl C (1996) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in two gecko species, Gekko gecko and Eublepharis macularius. J Acoust Soc Am 99(3):1588-1603
40. Manley GA, Köppl C, Sneary M (1999) Reversed tonotopic map of the basilar papilla in Gekko gecko. Hear Res 131(1-2):107-116
41. Martin GK, Stagner BB, Jassir D, Telischi FF, Lonsbury-Martin BL (1999) Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). I. Basic findings in rabbits. Hear Res 136(1-2):105-123
42. Meenderink SW (2005) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the anuran ear. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maastricht
43. Meenderink SW, Narins PM (2006) Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in the Northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens: implications for inner ear mechanics. Hear Res 220(1-2):67-75
44. Meenderink SW, van Dijk P (2004) Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. Hear Res 192:107-118
45. Meenderink SW, van Dijk P (2006) Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7(3):246-252
46. 2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6:37-47
47. Neely ST, Kim DO (1983) An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high selectivity. Hear Res 9(2):123-130
48. Peake PT, Ling A Jr (1980) Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 67(5):1736-1745
49. Ronken DA (1991) Spike discharge properties that are related to the characteristic frequency of single units in the frog auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 90(5):2428-2440
50. Rosowski JJ, Peake WT, White JR (1984) Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard. Hear Res 13(2):141-158
51. Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Powers NL, Boettcher FA (1992) Discharge patterns of the cochlear ganglion neurons in the chicken. J Comp Physiol A 170: 227-241
52. Sams-Dodd F, Capranica RR (1994) Representation of acoustic signals in the eighth nerve of the Tokay gecko: I. Pure tones. Hear Res 76:16-30
53. Saunders SS, Salvi RJ (1993) Psychoacoustics of normal adult chickens: thresholds and temporal integration. J Acoust Soc Am 94(1):83-90
54. Schairer KS, Ellison JC, Fitzpatrick D, Keefe DH (2006) Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 120(2):901-914
55. Shera CA (2003) Wave interference in the generation of reflection- and distortion-source emissions. In: Gummer AW et al (eds) Biophysics of the cochlea: from molecules to models. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 439-453
56. Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105(2):782-798
57. Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (2003) Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J Acoust Soc Am 113(5):2762-2772
58. Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (2007) Cochlear traveling-wave amplification, suppression, and beamforming probed using noninvasive calibration of intracochlear distortion sources. J Acoust Soc Am 121(2):1003-1016
59. Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr, Oxenham AJ (2002) Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(5):3318-3323
60. Shofner WP, Feng AS (1983) A quantitative light microscopic study of the bullfrog amphibian papilla tectorium: correlation with tonotopic organization. Hear Res 11:103-116
61. Stewart CE, Hudspeth AJ (2000) Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(1):454-459
62. Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Piskorski P (1998) Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 104(3): 1517-1543
63. Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Tong C (2000) Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 108(6): 2911-2932
64. Tanaka K, Smith CA (1975) Structure of the avian tectorial membrane. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 84(3 pt. 1):287-296
65. Tanaka K, Smith CA (1978) Structure of the chicken's inner ear: SEM and TEM study. Am J Anat 153(2):251-271
66. Taschenberger G, Manley GA (1997) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl. Hear Res 110:61-76
67. Tilney LG, Saunders JC (1983) Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochlea. I. Length, number, width, and distribution of stereocilia of each hair cell are related to the position of the hair cell on the cochlea. J Cell Biol 96(3):807-821
68. Ulehlova L, Voldrich L, Janisch R (1987) Correlative study of sensory cell density and cochlear length in humans. Hear Res 28:149-151
69. van der Heijden M, Joris PX (2006) Panoramic measurements of the apex of the cochlea. J Neurosci 26(44):11462-11473
70. van Dijk P, Narins PM, Wang J (1996) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species. Hear Res 101:102-112
71. van Dijk P, Mason MJ, Narins PM (2002) Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties. Hear Res 173:100-108
72. van Dijk P, Narins PM, Mason MJ (2003) Physiological vulnerability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the amphibian ear. J Acoust Soc Am 114(4):2044-2048
73. Veuillet E, Gartner M, Champsaur G, Neidecker J, Collet L (1997) Effects of hypothermia on cochlear micromechanical properties in humans. J Neurol Sci 145(1):69-76
74. von Bekesy G (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York
75. Werner YL (1976) Optimal temperatures for inner-ear performance in gekkonoid lizards. J Exp Zool 195(3):319-352
76. Wever EG (1973) The ear and hearing in the frog, Rana pipiens. J Morphol 141:461-478
77. Wever EG (1978) The reptile ear. Princeton University Press, Englewood Cliffs
78. Wever EG (1985) The amphibian ear. Princeton University Press, Englewood Cliffs
79. Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Marin BL (1996) Visualization of the onset of distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency. J Acoust Soc Am 100(3):1663-1679
80. Zweig G, Shera CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98(4):2018-2047