A Capillary-Based Perfusion Phantom for the Simulation of Brain Perfusion for MRI;Ein kapillarbasiertes Phantom zur Simulation der Gehirnperfusion mit der Magnet-Resonanz-Tomografie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 182, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 883-890

  Maciak, A ^a   Kronfeld, A ^a   Muller Forell W ^a   Wille, C ^b   Kempski, O ^a   Stoeter, P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES BINGEN   (Germany)

^c CEDIMAT Cardiovascular Center   (Dominican Republic)

Author keywords

brain; CBF; gold standard; MR imaging; phantom; simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN PERFUSION; CAPILLARY; FLOW RATE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SOFTWARE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN; BRAIN CIRCULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MICROCIRCULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN; CAPILLARIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROCIRCULATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77958156630     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245507     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Calamante F., Thomas D. L., Pell G. S. et al. Measuring Cerebral Blood Flow Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques. J Cer Blood Flow Metab: 1999; 19 701 735
2. Yamada K., Wu O., Gonzales R. G. Magnetic Resonance perfusion-weighted imaging of acute cerebral infarction: effect of the calculation methods and underlying vasculopathy. Stroke: 2002; 33 87 94
3. Lorenz R. J. Grundbegriffe der Biometrie. 4. Aufl. Stuttgart Gustav-Fischer Verlag: 1996; 3-437-251-007
4. Oltmann A. Vergleichende Volumetrie von Ultraschall- und Magnetresonanztomographie-Datensätzen mit einem Hybridphantom. Medizinische Fakultät, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Diss.: 2004
5. Hein I. A., O'Brian W. D. A flexible blood flow phantom capable of independently producing constant and pulsatile flow with a predictable spatial flow profile for ultrasound flow measurement validations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering: 1992; P39
6. Jo B. J., Chung T. S., Lee M. S. et al. Comparison of Gadomer-17 and Gd-DTPA in image quality of contrast angiographies using flow phantom model. Yonsei Medical Journal: 1999; 40 413 419
7. Hansen C., Hüttebräuker N., Wilkening W. et al. Three-dimensional Reconstruction of Fine Vascularity in Ultrasound Breast Imaging using Contrast-enhanced Spatial Compounding: In-vitro Analyses. Academic Radiology: 2008; 1 18 26
8. Lehmpfuhl M., Hao C., Martirosian et al. Flussuntersuchung an Strömungsphantomen im Vor- und Nachlauf stenoseförmiger Verengung mittels geschwindigkeitskodierter MRT und numerischer Simulation der Fluiddynamik. Biomedizinische Technik: 2009; 54 38 47
9. Lee G. R., Hernandez-Garcia L., Noll D. C. A Phantom for Quantitative Spin Tagging Measurements. ISMRM 2002, Proceedings 7 P97
10. Ku J. P., Elkins C. J., Taylor C. A. Comparison of Blood flow patterns from CFD and MRI in a bypass graft model. In: Medical Engineering, American S. (Hrsg.): Summer Bioengineering Conference. American Society of Medical Engineering, Key Biscayne (Florida), 25 - 29 June 2003. Proceedings 1 819 820
11. Wilkening W. Konzepte zur Signalverarbeitung für die Kontrastmittelspezifische Ultraschall-Abbildung. Ruhr-Universität Bochum Diss.: 2003
12. Salvado O., Hillenbrand C., Chang S. et al. Method to Correct Intensity Inhomogeneity in MR Images for Atherosclerosis Characterization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging: 2006; 25 539 552
13. Mathys C., Rybacki K., Lanzmann R. et al. Perfusions-Phantom zur computertomographischen Messung des cerebralen Blutflusses. Workshop Experimentelle Radiologie, Mainz, 13. - 14. Feb. 2009. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2009; 181 12 15
14. Haberland U., Cordes J., Lell M. et al. Biological Phantom for Contrast-Media-Based Perfusion Studies With CT. Invest Radiol: 29 Aug 2009; [Epub ahead of print]
15. Hindle A. J., Perkins A. C. A perfusion phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol: 1994; 20 309 314
16. Siemens Medical Solutions, AG. Syngo Suite 3. http://www.medical.siemens.com [Zitiert am 06.01.2010]
17. Sachs L., Hedderich J. Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung. Berlin Springer Verlag: 2006; 3-540-321-608
18. Keston P., Murray A. D., Jackson A. Cerebral Perfusion Imaging using Contrast-enhanced MRI. Clin Radiol: 2003; 58 505 513
19. Oestergaard L., Weisskoff R. M., Chesler D. A. et al. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passage - part 1: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Res Med: 1996; 36 715 725
20. Perthen J. E., Calamante F., Gadian D. et al. Is Quantification of Bolus Tracking MRI Reliable Without Deconvolution? Magn Res in Med: 2002; 47 61 67
21. Calamante F., Gadien D. G., Conelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: Assumptions, Limitations and potential Implications for clinical use. Stroke: 2002; 22 1146 1151
22. Rempp K., Brix G., Wenz F. et al. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume by dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MR imaging. Radiology: 1994; 194 637 641
23. Rosen B., Belliveau J., Aronen H. J. et al. Susceptibility contrast imaging of cerebral blood volume: Human Experience. Magn Res Med: 1992; 22 293 299
24. Schreiber W. G., Gueckel F., Stritzke P. et al. Cerebral blood volume and cerebrovascular reserve capacity: Estimation by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Cer Blood Flow Metab: 1998; 18 1143 1156
25. Lia T. Q., Guang C. Z., Oestergaard L. et al. Quantification of cerebral blood flow by bolus tracking and artery spin tagging methods. Magn Res Imag: 2000; 18 503 512
26. Kuchinski T. Imaging in acute stroke - a personal view. Clin Neuroradiol: 2009; 19 20 30