Fluid studies on flow behaviour in narrowing vessels with PC-velocimetry and numerical simulations;Flussuntersuchungen an strömungsphantomen im vor- und nachlauf stenoseförmiger verengungen mittels geschwindigkeitskodierter MRT und numerischer simulation der fluiddynamik

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 38-47

  Lehmpfuhl, Monika ^a,b   Hao, Chongyang ^a   Martirosian, Petros ^c   Schick, Fritz ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; PC velocimetry; Reattachment length; Stent stenosis quantification

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL DISEASE; ELASTIC PROPERTIES; FLOW BEHAVIOURS; FLOW PROFILES; GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS; HAEMODYNAMICS; LAMINAR CONDITIONS; METALLIC STENTS; NON NEWTONIANS; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; ON FLOWS; PC-VELOCIMETRY; REATTACHMENT LENGTH; RESTENOSIS; SIGNAL LOSS; STENOSES; STENT-STENOSIS QUANTIFICATION; STEP SIZES; VECTOR PLOTS; VESSEL WALLS;

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUIDS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; TURBULENCE; VELOCIMETERS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

DYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; RHEOLOGY;

EID: 59149092102     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2009.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Armaly BF, Durst F, Pereira JCF, Schönung B. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J Fluid Mech 1983; 127: 473-496.
2. Boesiger P, Maier SE, Kecheng L, Scheidegger MB, Meier D. Visualization and quantification of the human blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 1992; 25: 55-67.
3. Brenner P, Wintersperger B, von Smekal A, Agirov V, Bohm D, Kreuzer E, et al. Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 389-393.
4. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 75-88.
5. Canstein C, Cachot P, Faust A, Stalder AF, Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, et al. 3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 535-546.
6. Evans AJ, Blinder RA, Herkens RJ, et al. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 512-518.
7. Gao J-H, Gore JC. Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. Med Phys 1991; 18: 1045-1051.
8. Graf H, Lauer UA, Klemm T, Schnieder L, Schick F. Artefakte in der MRT durch Instrumente und Implantate. Z Med Phys 2003; 13: 165-170.
9. Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA, Ordovas KG, Reddy GP, Alley MT, et al. Evaluation of bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2008; 117: 2818-2819.
10. Kalden P, Kreitner KF, Wittlinger T, Voigtlander T, Krummenauer F, Kestel J, et al. Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts: value of different breath-hold MR imaging techniques. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1359-1364.
11. Kalden P, Kreitner KF, Wittlinger T, Voigtländer T, Krummenauer F, Schreiber W, et al. The assessment of the patency of coronary bypass vessels with a 2D T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence (HASTE) in the breath-hold technique. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999; 170: 442-448.
12. Lee, T, Mateescu D. Experimental and numerical investigation of 2-D backward-facing step flow. J Fluids Struct 1998; 12: 703-716.
13. Maintz D, Kugel H, Schellhammer F, Landwehr P. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Investig Radiol 2001; 36: 218-224.
14. Mouza AA, Pantzali MN, Paras SV. Experimental and numerical study of backward facing step flow. 5th National Chemical Engineering Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2005. Abstract.
15. Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2007; 40: 367-377.
16. Perktold K, Resch M, Florian. Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomechanical Eng 1991; 113: 464-475.
17. Spielmann RP, Schneider O, Thiele M, Bucheler E. Appearance of poststenotic jets in MRI: dependence on flow velocity and on imaging parameters. Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 9: 67-72.
18. Sun Y, Hearshen DO, Rankin GW, Haggar AM. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 443-452.
19. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL. Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in thepresence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 377-385.
20. Thurston GB. Rheological parameters for the viscosity, viscoelasticity and thixotropy of blood. Biorheology 1979; 16: 149-162.
21. Thurston GB. Viscoelasticity of human blood. Biophys J 1972; 12: 1205-1217.
22. Truckenbrodt EA. Fluidmechanik. Bände 1 und 2. Springer: 1996 und 1999.
23. Van Rossum AC, Galjee MA, Post JC, Visser CA. A practical approach to MRI of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13: 199-204.
24. Voigtländer T, Abegunewardene N, Kreitner KF, Landschütz W, Petersen SE, Wittlinger T, et al. Untersuchungen zur Zuverlässigkeit der MRT-Flußmessung mit Phasenkontrasttechnik in koronaren Bypassgefäßen. J Kardiol 2003; 10: 107-112.