Confidence and professional judgment in assessing children's risk of abuse

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 621-628

  Regehr, Cheryl ^a   Bogo, Marion ^a   Shlonsky, Aron ^a   LeBlanc, Vicki ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

actuarial tools; child abuse; child welfare; professional judgment; risk assessment; standardized measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958155014     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049731510368050     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arad-Davidzon, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2008). The role of worker's attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers' assessments and recommendations regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 107-121.
2. Arkes, H. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, 49, 232-330.
3. Baird, C., Wagner, D., Healy, T., & Johnson, K. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 839-871.
4. Barber, J., Shlonsky, A., Black, T., Goodman, D., & & Trocmẽ, N. (2008). Reliability and predictive validity of a consensus-based risk assessment tool. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2, 173-195.
5. Baumann, A., Deber, R., & Thompson, G. (1991). Overconfidence among physicians and nurses: The micro-certainly, macro uncertainty phenomenon. Social Science Medicine, 32, 167-174.
6. Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Woodford, M., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006). Beyond competencies: Field instructors' descriptions of student performance. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 191-205.
7. Camasso, M.J., & Jagannathan, R. (2000). Modeling the reliability and predictive validity of risk assessment in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 873-896.
8. Chu, W., & Tsui, M. (2008). The nature of practice wisdom in social work revisited. International Social Work, 51, 47-54.
9. Cicchinelli, L.F. (1991). Proceedings from the Symposium on Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services. National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Washington, DC.
10. Dawes, R.M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: Free Press.
11. DePanfilis, D., & Zuravin, S.J. (2001). Assessing risk to determine need for services. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 3-20.
12. English, D.J., & Pecora, P.J. (1994). Risk assessment as a practice in child protective services. Child Welfare, 73, 451-473.
13. Fluke, J.D., Baumann, D., England, P., Kern, H., Law, R., McFadden, T., & Schultz, F. (1995). Emerging critical conceptual issues in risk assessment research and practice. In T. Tatara (Ed.), Eighth National Roundtable on CPS risk assessment (pp. 239-250). Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.
14. Gambrill, E. (2005). Decision making in child welfare: Errors and their context. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 347-352.
15. Gambrill, E., & Shlonsky, A. (2000). Risk assessment in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 813-837.
16. Gambrill, E. (2006). Social work practice: A critical thinkers guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Gibbs, L. (2003). Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: A practical guide with integrated multimedia. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning.
18. Glascoe, F., & Dworkin, P. (1993). Obstacles to effective developmental surveillance: Errors in clinical reasoning. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 344-349.
19. Gold, N., Benbenishty, R., & Osmo, J. (2001). A comparative study of risk assessment and recommended interventions in Israel and Canada. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 409-429.
20. Goldberg, L., & Werts, C. (1966). The reliability of clinicians judgments: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 199-206.
21. Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
22. Hay, M., Weisner, T., Subramanian, S., Duan, N., Niedzinski, E., & Kravitz, R. (2008). Harnessing experience: Exploring the gap between evidence-based medicine and clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14, 707-713.
23. Haynes, R.B., Devereaux, P.J., & Guyatt, G.H. (2002). Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice [Editorial]. ACP Journal Club, March/April, 136, 1-7.
24. Horwath, J. (2006). The missing assessment domain: Personal, professional and organizational factors influencing professional judgments when identifying and referring child neglect. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1285-1303.
25. Johnson, W., & L'Esperance, J. (1984). Predicting the recurrence of child abuse. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 20, 21-26.
26. Kane, M.T. (1992). The assessment of professional competence. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 15, 163-182.
27. Laughlin, M. (2008). Reason, reality and objectivity-share dogmas and distortions in the way both "scientistic" and "postmodern" commentators frame the EBM debate. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14, 665-671.
28. Lindsey, D. (1992). Reliability of the foster care placement decision: A review. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 65-80.
29. Lyons, P., Doueck, H.J., & Wodarski, J.S. (1996). Risk assessment for child protective services: A review of the empirical literature on instrument performance. Social Work Research, 20, 143-154.
30. Mamassian, P. (2008). Overconfidence in an objective anticipatory motor task. Psychological Science, 19, 601-606.
31. McCracken, S., & Marsh, J. (2008). Practitioner expertise in evidence-based practice decision making. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 301-310.
32. McDonald, T., & Marks, J. (1991). A review of risk factors assessed in child protective services. Social Service Review, 65, 112-132.
33. Meehl, R. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Millar, K., Jelicic, M., Bonke, B., & Asbury, A. (1995). Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 74, 180-183.
35. Miller, J., Williams, K., English, D., & Olmstead, J. (1987). Risk assessment in child protection: A review of the literature. Occasional monograph series of APWA Social R&D Department (No. 1). Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.
36. Moerman, N., van Dam, F., Muller, M., & Oosting, H. (1996). The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesthesia & Analgesia, 182, 445-451.
37. Pecora, P.J. (1991). Investigating allegations of child maltreatment: The strengths and limitations of current risk assessment systems. In M. Robin (Ed.), Assessing child maltreatment reports: the problem of false allegations (pp. 73-92). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
38. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R.B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.
39. Schwalbe, C. (2008). Strengthening the integration of actuarial risk assessment with clinical judgment in an evidence based practice framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1458-1464.
40. Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 409-427.
41. Smith, D., & Dumont, F. (2002). Confidence in psychodiagnosis: What makes us so sure? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 292-298.
42. Spielberger, C. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
43. Van de Luitgaarden, G. (2009). Evidence-based practice in social work: Lessons from judgment and decision-making theory. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 243-260.
44. Wagner, D., & Johnson, K. (2006). The California structured decision making risk revalidation: A prospective study. Madison, WI: Children's Research Center.
45. Wald, M.S., & Woolverton, M. (1990). Risk assessment: The emperor's new clothes? Child Welfare, 69, 483-511.