A comparative study of risk assessments and recommended interventions in Canada and Israel

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 607-622

  Gold, Nora ^a,c   Benbenishty, Rami ^b   Osmo, Rujla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abuse; Child welfare; Decision making; Neglect; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CHILD WELFARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ISRAEL; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POLITICS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL WORKER; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 0034983223     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00228-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Child sexual abuse: Victim age, victim gender, and observer gender as factors contributing to attributions of responsibility
2. The best interests of the child: Decision-making factors
3. Poor children in Israel: How can we minimize the phenomenon?
4. The administrative and practice context: Perspectives from the front line
5. Feminist approaches: Women recreate child welfare
6. European child abuse management system
7. Special Issue: Toward a feminist approach to child welfare
8. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: Decision making models
9. Predicting child abuse and neglect
10. The welfare state in Israel in the 1990s: The evolution of social policy in a changing society
11. Decision making in child protection: The use of theoretical, empirical and procedural knowledge by novices and experts and implications for fieldwork placement
12. The child-care crisis: Realities of women's caring
13. Using participatory action research to help promote the physical and mental health of female social workers in child welfare
14. Newspaper coverage of people with disabilities in Canada and Israel: An international comparison
15. Key decisions in child protective services: Report investigations and court referral
16. The need for a paradigm shift in social work: The study of parenting
17. Reasoning about the removal of a child from home: A comparison of police officers and social workers
18. Should this child be removed from home? Hypothesis generation and information seeking as predictors of case decisions
19. Factors affecting case management recommendations for children entering state custody
20. Child protection, the law, and dangerousness
21. Knowledge use in direct practice
22. Information integration in child welfare cases: An introduction to statistical decision making
23. Modeling expert judgment and decision making in cases of alleged child abuse and neglect
24. Missing persons: Women in child welfare
25. Contradictions in child welfare: Neglect and responsibility
26. Rethinking child welfare