|
Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 665-671
|
Reason, reality and objectivity - Shared dogmas and distortions in the way both 'scientistic' and 'postmodern' commentators frame the EBM debate
|
Author keywords
Conceptual frameworks; EBM; Epistemology; Objectivity subjectivity; Philosophical commitment; Positivism; Postmodernism; Practical reason; Professional judgement; Scientism
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
EPISTEMOLOGY;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
INTELLIGENCE;
MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION;
MEDICAL EDUCATION;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MEDICAL SCHOOL;
PHILOSOPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
BENCHMARKING;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
CLINICAL MEDICINE;
COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
JUDGMENT;
LOGIC;
PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL;
POSTMODERNISM;
PREJUDICE;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
PROFESSIONAL ROLE;
SCIENCE;
THINKING;
|
EID: 55349133842
PISSN: 13561294
EISSN: 13652753
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01075.x Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (24)
|
References (20)
|