The new bureaucracies of virtue: Introduction

Political and Legal Anthropology Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 181-191

  Jacob, Marie Andrée ^a   Riles, Annelise ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958144903     PISSN: 10816976     EISSN: 15552934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.181     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bledsoe, Caroline H., Bruce Sherin., Nathalia Headley., Carol Heimer., Erick Kjeldgaard., James Lindgren., Jon Miller., Michael Roloff., and David Uttal., 2007 Regulating Creativity: Research and Survival in the IRB Iron Cage. Northwestern University Law Review 101(2): 593-641.
2. Bourgois, Philippe., 1990 Confronting Anthropological Ethics: Ethnographic Lessons from Central American. Journal of Peace Research 27(1): 43-54.
3. Bradburd, Daniel., 2006 Fuzzy Boundaries and Hard Rules: Unfunded Research and the IRB. American Ethnologist 33(4): 492-498.
4. Calle, Sophie., and Jean Baudrillard., 1983 Suite Vénitienne/Please Follow Me. DanyBrash and DannyHatfïeld, trans. Seattle: Bay Press.
5. Dominguez, Virginia R., 2006 Foreword. American Ethnologist 33(4): 475-476.
6. Edelman, Lauren B., Sally Riggs Fuller., and Sharon F. Matusik., 2000 Legal Readings: Employee Interpretation and Mobilization of Law. The Academy of Management Review 25(1): 200-216.
7. Fassin, Didier., 2006 The End of Ethnography as Collateral Damage of Ethical Regulation? American Ethnologist 33(4): 522-524.
8. Gunsalus, C. Kristina., Edward Bruner., Nicholas Burbules., Leon DeCosta Dash., Matthew W. Finkin., Joseph Goldberg., William Greenough., Gregory Miller., and Michael G. Pratt., 2005 The Illinois White Paper. Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB Mission Creep. Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois.
9. Hamburger, Philip., 2005, The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards. Legal June 23 Scholarship Network, Law School Working Papers Series, University of Chicago Law School Public Law and Legal Theory 7(4).
10. Hamburger, Philip., 2007 Getting Permission Northwestern University Law Review 101(2): 405-490.
11. Jacob, Marie-Andrée., 2006 The Match of Relatedness: Bureaucracy, Legitimation and Kinship in Organ Transplants. J.S.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
12. Katz, Jack., 2006 Ethical Escape Routes for Underground Ethnographers. American Ethnologist 33(4): 499-506.
13. Kelly, Ann., 2003 Research and the Subject: The Practice of Informed Consent. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 26(2): 182-195.
14. Kleinman, Arthur., 1999 Moral Experience and Ethical Reflection: Can Ethnography Reconcile Them? A Quandary for The New Bioethics. Daedalus 128(4).
15. Lederman, Rena., 2006a Introduction: Anxious Borders between Work and Life in a Time of Bureaucratic Ethics Regulation. American Ethnologist 33(4): 477-481.
16. Lederman, Rena., 2006b The Perils of Working at Home: IRB “Mission Creep” as Context and Content for an Ethnography of Disciplinary Knowledges. American Ethnologist 33(4): 482-491.
17. Lederman, Rena., 2006c The Ethical Is Political. American Ethnologist 33(4): 545-548.
18. Massé, Raymond., 2000 Présentation: L’anthropologie au défi de l’éthique. Revue Anthropologie et Sociétés 24(2): 1-7.
19. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1979 Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Northwestern University Law Review2007 Special issue on “Censorship and Institutional Review Boards.”.
21. Palys, Ted., and John Lowman., 2006 Protecting Research Confidentiality: Towards a Research-Participant Shield Law. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/ Revue canadienne droit et société 21(1): 163-185.
22. Piron, Florence., 2006 Réponse à Palys et Lowman. Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue canadienne droit et société 21(1): 187-196.
23. Plattner, Stuart., 2006 Comment on IRB Regulation of Ethnographic Research. American Ethnologist 33(4): 525-528.
24. Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006 Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
25. Shweder, Richard., 2006 Protecting Human Subjects and Preserving Academic Freedom: Prospects from the University of Chicago. American Ethnologist 33(4): 507-518.
26. Storr, Robert., 2003 Fait et fiction: Sophie Calle. La femme qui n’était pas là. MarianneGroves, trans.Art Press295(November): 23-28.
27. Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000 Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.
28. Strathern, Marilyn., 2006 Don’t Eat Unwashed Lettuce. American Ethnologist 33(4): 532-534.
29. Sundar, Nandini., 2006 Missing the Ethical Wood for the Bureaucratic Trees. American Ethnologist 33(4): 535-537.
30. Sykes, Karen., 2005 Arguing with Anthropology. An Introduction to Critical Theories of the Gift. London: Routledge.
31. Thorne, Barrie., 1980 You Still Takin’ Notes?" Fieldwork and Problems of Informed Consent. Journal of Social Problems 27(3): 284-297.
32. World Medical Association1964 The Declaration of Helsinki (Document 17.C). Helsinki, Finland.