Introduction: Anxious borders between work and life in a time of bureaucratic ethics regulation

American Ethnologist

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 477-481

  Lederman, Rena ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750100489     PISSN: 00940496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.477     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. American Association of University Professors 2001 Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research. Academe 87(3). Electronic document, http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/ repirb.htm, accessed August 2, 2003.
2. American Association of University Professors 2002 Should All Disciplines Be Subject to the Common Rule? Human Subjects of Social Science Research. Academe 88(3). Electronic document, http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02mj/02mjftr.htm, accessed August 2, 2003.
3. Beecher, Henry K. 1966 Ethics and Clinical Research. New England Journal of Medicine 274(24):1354-1360.
4. Chalmers, Donald 2001 Research Ethics in Australia. In National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, vol. 2: Commissioned Papers and Staff Analysis. Pp. A1-A66. Bethesda, MD: NBAC.
5. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) 2005 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 "Public Welfare," Part 46 "Protection of Human Subjects." (Revised 6/23/05, effective 6/23/05). Electronic document, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm, accessed June 12, 2006.
6. Faden, Ruth, and Tom L. Beauchamp 1986 AHistory and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Gunsalus, C. K., Edward Bruner, Nicholas C. Burbules, Leon Dash, Matthew Finkin, Joseph P. Goldberg, William T. Greenough, Gregory A. Miller, Michael G. Pratt, and Deb Aronson 2005 Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB "Missio0n Creep." The Illinois White Paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law. Electronic document, http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/ whitepaper, accessed November 1, 2005.
8. Hamburger, Philip 2005 The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards. Supreme Court Review, October 2004 Term:271-354.
9. Jones, James H. 1993 Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press.
10. Jorgensen, Dan N.d. Response to the Joint Committee Report on the Application of the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Unpublished MS, Department of Anthropology, University of Western Ontario.
11. Lewis, Graham, Mary Boulton, Nik Brown, and Andrew Webster 2004 The International Dimension to Research Ethics: The Significance of International and Other Non-UK Frameworks for UK Social Science. Discussion Paper, 2. Economic and Social Research Council Research Ethics Framework. Electronic document, http://www.york.ac.uk/res/ref/ docs/REFpaper2_v2.pdf, accessed May 1, 2006.
12. McCarthy, Charles R. 2001 Reflections on the Organizational Locus of the Office for Protection from Research Risks. In National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, vol. 2: Commissioned Papers and Staff Analysis. Pp. H1-H28. Bethesda, MD: NBAC.
13. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) 2001 Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, vol. 1: Report and Recommendations. Bethesda, MD: NBAC.
14. National Cancer Institute N.d. Human Participant Protections Education for Research Teams. Electronic document, http://cme.cancer.gov/ clinicaltrials/learning/humanparticipant-protections.asp, accessed September 30, 2005.
15. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1979 Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Panel on Research Ethics 2004 Giving Voice to the Spectrum. Report of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Ottawa: Interagency Advisory Panel and Secretariat on Research Ethics.
17. Pattullo, E. L. 1982 Modesty Is the Best Policy: The Federal Role in Social Research. In Ethical Issues in Social Science Research. Thomas Beauchamp, Ruth R. Faden, LeRoy Walters, and R. Jay Wallace, eds. Pp. 373-390. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Pattullo, E. L. 1984 Institutional Review Boards and Social Research: A Disruptive, Subjective Perspective, Retrospective and Prospective. In NIH Readings on the Protection of Human Subjects in Behavioral and Social Science Research: Conference Proceedings and Background Papers. Joan E. Sieber, ed. Pp. 10-17. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.
19. Penslar, Robin Levin, with Joan P. Porter 1993 Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) IRB Guidebook. Electronic document, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_guidebook.htm, accessed August 3, 2003.
20. Strathern, Marilyn 2000 Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge.
21. Tropp, Richard A. 1982 A Regulatory Perspective on Social Science Research. In Ethical Issues in Social Science Research. Thomas Beauchamp, Ruth R. Faden, LeRoy Walters, and R. Jay Wallace, eds. Pp. 391-415. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22. University of York and Oxford Brookes University 2003-05 Developing a Framework for Social Science Research Ethics. Electronic document, http://www.york.ac.uk/res/ref, accessed May 1, 2005.
23. World Medical Association 2002[1964] Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Electronic document, http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm, accessed August 3, 2003.