Influence of amplitude, starting point, and age on first-and second-order dynamics of edinger-westphal-stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 5378-5390

  Baumeister, Martin ^a,b   Wendt, Mark ^b   Glasser, Adrian ^b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ACCOMMODATION PARALYSIS; ACTION POTENTIAL; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDINGER WESTPHAL NUCLEUS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; IRIDECTOMY; LENS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTOMETRY; RHESUS MONKEY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VELOCITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; AGING; ANIMAL; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; ELECTRODE; EYE REFRACTION; MACACA; MESENCEPHALON; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGING; ANIMALS; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; IRIDECTOMY; MACACA MULATTA; MESENCEPHALON; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 77958142722     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5269     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Shirachi D, Liu J, Lee M, Jang J, Wong J, Stark L. Accommodation dynamics I. Range nonlinearity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978; 55:631-641.
2. Beers AP, Van Der Heijde GL. In vivo determination of the biomechanical properties of the component elements of the accommodation mechanism. Vision Res. 1994;34:2897-2905.
3. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3463-3472.
4. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Initial destination of the disaccommodation step response. Vision Res. 2006;46:1959-1972.
5. Fisher RF. The significance of the shape of the lens and capsular energy changes in accommodation. J Physiol. 1969;201:21-47.
6. Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Res. 2002;42:125-141.
7. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vision Res. 1999;39:1991-2015.
8. Heys KR, Cram SL, Truscott RJ. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? Mol Vis. 2004;10:956-963.
9. Weeber HA, Eckert G, Soergel F, Meyer CH, Pechhold W, van der Heijde RG. Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:425-434.
10. Weeber HA, Eckert G, Pechhold W, van der Heijde RG. Stiffness gradient in the crystalline lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1357-1366.
11. Tamm E, Croft MA, Jungkunz W, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman PL. Age-related loss of ciliary muscle mobility in the rhesus monkey: role of the choroid. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:871-876.
12. Tamm S, Tamm E, Rohen JW. Age-related changes of the human ciliary muscle: a quantitative morphometric study. Mech Ageing Dev. 1992;62:209-221.
13. Croft MA, Glasser A, Heatley G, et al. The zonula, lens, and circumlental space in the normal iridectomized rhesus monkey eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1087-1095.
14. Croft MA, Glasser A, Heatley G, et al. Accommodative ciliary body and lens function in rhesus monkeys, I: normal lens, zonule and ciliary process configuration in the iridectomized eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1076-1086.
15. Croft MA, McDonald JP, Nadkarni NV, Lin TL, Kaufman PL. Agerelated changes in centripetal ciliary body movement relative to centripetal lens movement in monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89: 824-832.
16. Sun FC, Stark L, Nguyen A, Wong J, Lakshminarayanan V, Mueller E. Changes in accommodation with age: static and dynamic. Am J Optom Physiol Optics. 1988;65:492-498.
17. Temme LA, Morris A. Speed of accommodation and age. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:106-112.
18. Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2006;46:1507-1519.
19. Heron G, Winn B. Binocular accommodation reaction and response times for normal observers. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1989;9: 176-183.
20. Schaeffel F, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. J Physiol. 1993;461:301-320.
21. Beers AP, van der Heijde GL. Age-related changes in the accommodation mechanism. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:235-242.
22. Heron G, Charman WN, Gray LS. Accommodation dynamics as a function of age. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002;22:389-396.
23. Heron G, Charman WN. Accommodation as a function of age and the linearity of the response dynamics. Vision Res. 2004;44:3119-3130.
24. Mordi JA, Ciuffreda KJ. Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia. Vision Res. 2004;44:591-601.
25. Schor CM, Bharadwaj SR. A pulse-step model of accommodation dynamics in the aging eye. Vision Res. 2005;45:1237-1254.
26. Baumeister M, Wendt M, Glasser A. Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodative dynamics in anesthetized, middle-aged rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:25-33.
27. Kaufman PL, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Total iridectomy in the primate in vivo: surgical technique and postoperative anatomy. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14:766-771.
28. Koretz JF, Bertasso AM, Neider MW, True-Gabelt BA, Kaufman PL. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res. 1987;45:317-326.
29. Crawford K, Terasawa E, Kaufman PL. Reproducible stimulation of ciliary muscle contraction in the cynomolgus monkey via a permanent indwelling midbrain electrode. Brain Res. 1989;503:265-272.
30. Bito LZ, Kaufman PL, DeRousseau CJ, Koretz J. Presbyopia: an animal model and experimental approaches for the study of the mechanism of accommodation and ocular ageing. Eye. 1987;1:222-230.
31. Crawford KS, Kaufman PL, Bito LZ. The role of the iris in accommodation of rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31: 2185-2190.
32. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:863-872.
33. Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. The relationship between refractive and biometric changes during Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:349-360.
34. Vilupuru AS, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Dynamics of accommodative fatigue in rhesus monkeys and humans. Vision Res. 2005; 45:181.
35. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Edinger-Westphal and pharmacologically stimulated accommodative refractive changes and lens and ciliary process movements in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84: 302-313.
36. Gamlin PD, Zhang Y, Clendaniel RA, Mays LE. Behavior of identified Edinger-Westphal neurons during ocular accommodation. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:2368-2382.
37. Judge SJ, Cumming BG. Neurons in the monkey midbrain with activity related to vergence eye movement and accommodation. J Neurophysiol. 1986;55:915-930.
38. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987;27:1139-1163.
39. Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Dynamic accommodative changes in Rhesus monkey eyes assessed with A-scan ultrasound biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:383-394.
40. Troilo D, Judge SJ. Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res. 1993;33:1311-1324.
41. van der Heijde GL, Weber J. Accommodation used to determine ultrasound velocity in the human lens. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66: 830-833.
42. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Effects of pharmacologically manipulated amplitude and starting point on edinger-westphal-stimulated accommodative dynamics in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:313-320.
43. Westheimer G, Blair SM. Accommodation of the eye during sleep and anesthesia. Vision Res. 1973;13:1035-1040.
44. Crawford K, Gabelt BT, Kaufman PL, Bito LZ. Effects of various anesthetic and autonomic drugs on refraction in monkeys. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:525-532.
45. Flugel-Koch C, Neuhuber WL, Kaufman PL, Lutjen-Drecoll E. Morphologic indication for proprioception in the human ciliary muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5529-5536.
46. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Comparisons between pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal-stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:609-617.
47. Fincham EF. The mechanism of accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1937;Monograph VIII:7-76.
48. Fisher RF. The elastic constants of the human lens. J Physiol. 1971;212:147-180.
49. Fisher RF. Presbyopia and the changes with age in the human crystalline lens. J Physiol. 1973;228:765-779.
50. Pau H, Kranz J. The increasing sclerosis of the human lens with age and its relevance to accommodation and presbyopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:294-296.
51. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res. 1998;38:209-229.
52. Tamm E, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz W, Rohen JW. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, presbyopic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32: 1678-1692.
53. Croft MA, Kaufman PL, Crawford KS, Neider MW, Glasser A, Bito LZ. Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:R1885-R1897.
54. Tornqvist G. Accommodation in monkeys: some pharmacological and physiological aspects. Acta Ophthalmol. 1967;45:429-460.
55. Kasthurirangan S, Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans. Vision Res. 2003;43:2945-2956.
56. Bharadwaj SR, Schor CM. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: First and second-order dynamics. Vision Res. 2006;46: 1019-1037.
57. Schor CM, Bharadwaj SR. Pulse-step models of control strategies for dynamic ocular accommodation and disaccommodation. Vision Res. 2006;46:242-258.