Probabilistic push-over analysis of structural and soil-structure systems

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1330-1341

  Barbato, M ^a   Gu, Q ^a,b   Conte, J P ^c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering demand parameter; Finite element response sensitivity; First order second moment method; Nonlinear finite element model; Random parameter

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION LIMIT; CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION; DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION METHODS; FE MODEL; FINITE-ELEMENT; FIRST ORDER SECOND MOMENT; FIRST-ORDER SECOND-MOMENT METHOD; FRAME BUILDINGS; GEOTECHNICAL SYSTEM; INELASTIC BEHAVIOR; LAYERED SOILS; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MEAN VALUES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE INFORMATION; RANDOM MATERIALS; RANDOM PARAMETERS; RC FRAME STRUCTURES; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL STRUCTURE SYSTEM; SOIL-FOUNDATION-STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; STATISTICAL CORRELATION; STATISTICAL MOMENTS; SYSTEM BEHAVIORS; SYSTEM RESPONSE; TORNADO DIAGRAMS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCRETE BRIDGES; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; MATERIALS; METHOD OF MOMENTS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77958133846     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000231     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). " Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings.." Rep. No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2005). " Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures.." Rep. No. ATC-55, Redwood City, CA.
3. Barbato, M. (2007). " Finite-element response sensitivity, probabilistic response and reliability analyses of structural systems with applications to earthquake engineering.." Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
4. Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2005). " Finite-element response sensitivity analysis: A comparison between force-based and displacement-based frame element models.." Appl. Mech. Eng. AMENFE 1425-1655, 194 (12-16), 1479-1512. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.04.011 (Pubitemid 40262939)
5. Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). " Finite-element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models.." Int. J. Reliab. Saf., 1 (1-2), 3-39. 10.1504/IJRS.2006.010688
6. Barbato, M., Gu, Q., and Conte, J. P. (2006). " Response sensitivity and probabilistic response analyses of reinforced concrete frame structures.." Proc., 8th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (CD-ROM).
7. Barbato, M., Zona, A., and Conte, J. P. (2007). " Finite-element response sensitivity analysis using three-field mixed formulation: General theory and application to frame structures.." Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. IJNMBH 0029-5981, 69 (1), 114-161. 10.1002/nme.1759 (Pubitemid 46117071)
8. Bjerager, P. (1990). " On computation methods for structural reliability analysis.." Struct. Safety ZZZZZZ 0167-4730, 9 (2), 79-96. 10.1016/0167-4730(90)90001-6
9. Bolotin, V. V. (1968). Statistical methods in structural mechanics, Holden-Day, Inc., San Francisco.
10. Chinese Building Press (CBP). (2001). " Code for seismic design of buildings.." GB 50011-2001, Beijing (in Chinese).
11. Conte, J. P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E. (2004). " Finite-element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models.." Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. IJNMBH 0029-5981, 59 (13), 1781-1820. 10.1002/nme.994 (Pubitemid 38462150)
12. Conte, J. P., Jagannath, M. K., and Meghella, M. (1995). " Earthquake response sensitivity analysis of concrete gravity dams.." Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability, 395-402.
13. Conte, J. P., Vijalapura, P. K., and Meghella, M. (2003). " Consistent finite-element response sensitivity analysis.." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT 0733-9399, 129 (12), 1380-1393. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1380) (Pubitemid 37554415)
14. Crandall, S. H. (2006). " A half-century of stochastic equivalent linearization.." Struct. Control Health Monit. ZZZZZZ 1545-2255, 13 (1), 27-40. 10.1002/stc.129 (Pubitemid 43266653)
15. Der Kiureghian, A., and Ke, B. -J. (1988). " The stochastic finite-element method in structural reliability.." Probab. Eng. Mech. PEMEEX 0266-8920, 3 (2), 83-91. 10.1016/0266-8920(88)90019-7
16. Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Wiley, New York.
17. Dong, W. M., Chiang, W. L., and Wong, F. S. (1987). " Propagation of uncertainties in deterministic systems.." Comput. Struct. CMSTCJ 0045-7949, 26 (3), 415-423. 10.1016/0045-7949(87)90041-1 (Pubitemid 17619684)
18. European Committee for Standardization (ECS). (2005). " Eurocode 8-Design of structures for earthquake resistance.." EN1998, Brussels, Belgium.
19. BSCC. (1997). " NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures.." FEMA 302-303, Washington, D.C.
20. Ghanem, R. G., and Spanos, P. D. (1991). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach, Springer, New York.
21. Grigoriu, M. (2000). " Stochastic mechanics.." Int. J. Solids Struct. IJSOAD 0020-7683, 37 (1-2), 197-214. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00088-8 (Pubitemid 30518271)
22. Gu, Q., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2009a). " Handling of constraints in finite-element response sensitivity analysis.." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT 0733-9399, 135 (12), 1427-1438. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000053
23. Gu, Q., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2010). " Probabilistic push-over response analysis of structural and/or geotechnical systems.." Rep. No. SSRP-2010/01, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego, San Diego.
24. 2 plasticity model by direct differentiation method.." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. CMMECC 0045-7825, 198 (30-32), 2272-2285. 10.1016/j.cma.2009.02.030
25. Haftka, R. T., and Gurdal, Z. (1993). Elements of structural optimization, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Germany.
26. Haukaas, T. (2006). " Efficient computation of response sensitivities for inelastic structures.." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH 0733-9445, 132 (2), 260-266. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(260) (Pubitemid 43107243)
27. Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2004). " Finite-element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering.." Rep. No. PEER 2003/14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
28. Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). " Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite-element reliability analysis.." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT 0733-9399, 131 (10), 1013-1026. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9399(2005)131:10(1013) (Pubitemid 41419833)
29. Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T. D., and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics: Theory and finite-element computation, Wiley, New York.
30. Liu, J. S. (2001). Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer series in statistics, Springer, Berlin.
31. Lupoi, G., Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., and Pinto, P. E. (2006). " Seismic fragility analysis of structural systems.." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT 0733-9399, 132 (4), 385-395. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:4(385) (Pubitemid 43870517)
32. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., and Fenves, G. L. (2007). OpenSees command language manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, CA, 〈 http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/ manuals/usermanual/OpenSeesCommandLanguageManual.pdf 〉 (August 2010).
33. Mirza, S. A., and MacGregor, J. G. (1979). " Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars.." J. Struct. Div. JSDEAG 0044-8001, 105 (5), 921-937.
34. Mirza, S. A., MacGregor, J. G., and Hatzinikolas, M. (1979). " Statistical descriptions of strength of concrete.." J. Struct. Div. JSDEAG 0044-8001, 105 (6), 1021-1037. (Pubitemid 9441970)
35. Phoon, K. K., and Kulhawy, F. H. (1996). " On quantifying inherent soil variability.." Proc., ASCE GED Spec. Conf. on Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 1, ASCE, Reston, VA, 326-340.
36. Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., and Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). " Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables.." Earthquake Spectra EASPEF 8755-2930, 18 (4), 719-743. 10.1193/1.1516201
37. Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M. (2000). Sensitivity analysis, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
38. Scott, B. D., Park, P., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1982). " Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high-strain rates.." J. Am. Concr. Inst. JACIAX 0002-8061, 79 (1), 13-27.
39. To, C. W. S. (2001). " On computational stochastic structural dynamics applying finite elements.." Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. ZZZZZZ 1134-3060, 8 (1), 3-40. 10.1007/BF02736683 (Pubitemid 33264963)
40. Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2005). " Finite-element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection.." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT 0733-9399, 131 (11), 1126-1139. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1126) (Pubitemid 41568938)
41. Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). " Finite-element response sensitivity analysis of continuous steel-concrete composite girders.." Steel Compos. Struct. ZZZZZZ 1229-9367, 6 (3), 183-202. (Pubitemid 43864249)