Response sensitivity and probabilistic response analyses of reinforced concrete frame structures

8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2006

Volumn 4, Issue , 2006, Pages 2357-2366

  Barbato, M ^a   Gu, Q ^a   Conte, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION METHODS; FINITE DIFFERENCE; FINITE ELEMENT; FIRST ORDER SECOND MOMENT; GAIN INSIGHT; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PROBABILISTIC RESPONSE; PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS; QUASI-STATIC; REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARD DEVIATION; STATISTICAL MOMENTS;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

EID: 84866003451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. ATC, 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, ATC-40 Report, Volumes 1 and 2, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
2. Barbato, M., and Conte, J.P., 2005. Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis: a Comparison between Force-Based and Displacement-Based Frame Element Models, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194:1479-1512. (Pubitemid 40262939)
3. Conte, J.P., Jagannath, M.K., and Meghella, M., 1995. Earthquake Response Sensitivity Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams, Proc. 7th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability, 395-402, Paris, France, July 10-13, 1995.
4. Conte, J.P., 2001. Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in the New Millennium, Spenser and Hu, Swets and Zeitlinger, 395-401.
5. Conte, J.P., Vijalapura, P.K., and Meghella, M., 2003. Consistent Finite-Element Response Sensitivity Analysis, Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE), 129:1380-1393. (Pubitemid 37554415)
6. Conte, J.P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E., 2004. Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis Using Force-Based Frame Models, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 59:1781-1820. (Pubitemid 38462150)
7. Der Kiureghian, A., and Ke, B.-J., 1988. The Stochastic Finite Element Method in Structural Reliability, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3(2): 83-91.
8. Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H.O., 1996. Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley, New York, U.S.A.
9. FEMA 302-303, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 1997.
10. Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T.D., and Kowalczyk, P., 1997. Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computation. Wiley, New York, U.S.A.
11. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F. and Fenves, G.L. (2005). OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
12. Mirza, S.A., and MacGregor, J.G., 1979. Variability of Mechanical Properties of Reinforcing Bars, Journal of the Structural Division, 105(5): 921-937.
13. Mirza, S.A., MacGregor, J.G., and Hatzinikolas, M., 1979. Statistical Descriptions of Strength of Concrete, Journal of the Structural Division, 105(6): 1021-1037. (Pubitemid 9441970)
14. Scott, B.D., Park, P., and Priestley, M.J.N. (1982). Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High-Strain Rates, Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 79(1):13-27. (Pubitemid 12510023)