Handling of constraints in finite-element response sensitivity analysis

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 135, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1427-1438

  Gu, Quan ^a   Barbato, Michele ^b   Conte, Joel P ^c  

^a AMEC FOSTER WHEELER   (United States)

^b Louisiana State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Constitutive models; Constraints; Finite element method; Sensitivity analysis; Soil structure interactions

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER IMPLEMENTATIONS; CONSTITUTIVE PARAMETERS; CONSTRAINT HANDLING; CONSTRAINTS; DIRECT DIFFERENTIATION METHODS; FE MODEL; FINITE-ELEMENT; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING; FLOOR SLABS; FORWARD FINITE DIFFERENCES; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER METHOD; NON-LINEAR FE; NONLINEAR BENCHMARK; PENALTY FUNCTION METHODS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; RESPONSE PARAMETERS; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC EXCITATIONS; SOIL-FOUNDATION-STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TIME HISTORY; TRANSFORMATION EQUATIONSS;

BENCHMARKING; BUILDING MATERIALS; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOLOGIC MODELS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BENCHMARKING; BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; DIFFERENTIATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOUNDATION; LINEARITY; MODEL VALIDATION; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; RIGIDITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 70549099723     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000053     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Advanced Technology Council (ATC-55). (2005). Evaluation and improvement of inelastic analysis procedure, Advanced Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
2. Barbato, M. (2007). "Finite element response sensitivity, probabilistic response and reliability analyses of structural systems with applications to earthquake engineering." Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ., of California at San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
3. Barbato M., and Conte J. P. (2005). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis: A comparison between force-based and displacement-based frame element models." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. CMMECC0045-7825, 194(12-16), 1479-1512. 10.1016/ j.cma.2004.04.011
4. Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). "Finite element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models." Int. J. of Reliability and Safety, 1(1-2), 3-39. 10.1504/IJRS.2006.010688
5. Barbato, M., Zona, A., and Conte, J. P. (2007). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis using three-field mixed formulation: general theory and application to frame structures." Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. IJNMBH0029-5981, 69(1), 114-161. 10.1002/nme.1759
6. Chopra, A. K. (2001). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
7. Conte, J. P. (2001). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis in earthquake engineering." Earthquake engineering frontiers in the new millennium, Spencer & Hu, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands, 395-401.
8. Conte, J. P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E. (2004). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models." Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. IJNMBH0029-5981, 59(13), 1781-1820. 10.1002/ nme.994
9. Conte, J. P., Vijalapura, P. K., and Meghella, M. (2003). "Consistent finite element response sensitivity analysis." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-9399, 129(12), 1380-1393. 10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:12(1380)
10. Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., and Witt, R. J. (2002). Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York.
11. Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Wiley, New York.
12. Felippa, C. A. (2001). "Introduction to finite element method." Ebook, (May 10, 2009).
13. Franchin, P. (2004). "Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-9399, 130(2), 180-191. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(180)
14. Gu, Q. (2008). "Finite element response sensitivity and reliability analysis of soil-foundation-structure-interaction systems." Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California at San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
15. Gu, Q., Conte, J. P., Elgamal, A., and Yang, Z., (2009). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis of multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model by direct differentiation method." Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(30-32), 2272-2285.
16. Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). "Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-9399, 131(10), 1013-1026. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:10(1013)
17. Haukaas, T., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2007). "Methods and object-oriented software for FE reliability and sensitivity analysis with application to a bridge structure." J. Comput. Civ. Eng. JCCEE50887-3801, 21(3), 151-163. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:3(151)
18. Haukaas, T., and Scott, M. H. (2006). "Shape sensitivities in the reliability analysis of nonlinear frame structures." Comput. Struc., 84(15-16), 964-977. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.02.0140045-7949
19. Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T. D., and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics: Theory and finite element computations, Wiley, New York.
20. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., and Fenves, G. L. (2005). "OpenSees Command Language Manual." Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, (May 10, 2009).
21. Prevost, J. H. (1977). "Mathematical modelling of monotonic and cyclic undrained clay behaviour." Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Meth. Geomech. IJNGDZ0363-9061, 1(2), 195-216. 10.1002/nag.1610010206
22. Scott, B. D., Park, P., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1982). "Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high-strain rates." J. Am. Concr. Inst. JACIAX0002-8061, 79(1), 13-27.
23. Scott, M. H., and Filippou, F. C. (2007). "Response gradients for nonlinear beam-column elements under large displacements." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 133(2), 155-165. 10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(155)
24. Scott, M. H., Franchin, P., Fenves, G. L., and Filippou, F. C. (2004). "Response sensitivity for nonlinear beam-column elements." J. Struct. Eng. JSENDH0733-9445, 130(9), 1281-1288. 10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1281)
25. Scott, M. H., and Haukaas, T. (2008). "Software framework for parameter updating and finite element response sensitivity analysis." J. Comput. Civ. Eng. JCCEE50887-3801, 22(5), 281-291. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:5(281)
26. Zhang, Y., and Der Kiureghian, A. (1993). "Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. CMMECC0045-7825, 108, 23-36. 10.1016/0045-7825(93)90151-M
27. Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2004). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite structures." Rep. No. SSRP-04/02, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, San Diego, Calif.
28. Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2005). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis of steel-concrete composite beams with deformable shear connection." J. Eng. Mech. JENMDT0733-9399, 131(11), 1126-1139. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:11(1126)
29. Zona, A., Barbato, M., and Conte, J. P. (2006). "Finite element response sensitivity analysis of continuous steel-concrete composite girders." Steel Compos. Struct. ZZZZZZ1229-9367, 6(3), 183-202.