Sorbion sachet S: Clinical application and results

Journal of Wound Care

Volumn 19, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2010, Pages 14-18

  Butcher, Martyn ^a  

^a Independent Tissue Viability Consultant   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958058727     PISSN: 09690700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.sup1.48266     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., Armstrong, D. G. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:2, 244-269.
2. Trengove, N. J., Stacey, M. C., MacAuley, S. et al. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1999;7:6, 442-452.
3. Saarialho-Kere, U. K. Patterns of matrix metalloproteinase and TIMP expression in chronic ulcers. Arch Dermatol Res 1998;290: Suppl, S47-54.
4. Neely, A. N., Clendening, C E., Gardner, J., Greenhalgh, D. G. Gelatinase activities in wounds of healing-impaired mice versus wounds of non-healingimpaired mice. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000;21:5, 395-402.
5. Mulder, G. D., Vande Berg, J. S. Cellular senescence and matrix metalloproteinase activity in chronic wounds. Relevance to debridement and new technologies. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002;92:1, 34-37.
6. White, R. J., Cutting, K. F. Interventions to avoid maceration of the skin and wound bed. Br J Nurs 2003;12:20, 1186-1201.
7. Gray, M., Weir, D. Prevention and treatment of moistureassociated skin damage (maceration) in the periwound skin. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:2, 153-157.
8. Sharp, C. A. Efficient management of the wound environment using Hydration Response Technology (HRT). Poster presentation at Tissue Viability Society conference 2009, Telford, UK.
9. Cutting, K. F. Optimal exudate management in a dressing. J Community Nursing 2008;22:11, 33-34.
10. Kwon Lee, Maloney S, Hermans MHE. (2009) data on file Sorbion AG, Ostbevern, Germany.
11. Chadwick, P. The use of sorbion sachet S in the treatment of a highly exuding diabetic foot wound. The Diabetic Foot Journal 2008;11:4 183-186.
12. Cutting, K. F. Managing wound exudate using a superabsorbent polymer dressing: a 53-patient clinical evaluation. J Wound Care 2009;18:5, 200, 202-205.
13. Vowden, K. R., Vowden, P. Wound debridement. Part 2: Sharp techniques. JWC 1999;8:5, 237-240
14. Tissue Viability Nurses Association Conservative Sharp Debridement. Procedures, Competencies and Training. TVNA, 2005. http://tinyurl.com/yzj3w4w
15. Romanelli, M., Dini, V., Bertone, M. A pilot study evaluating the wound and skin care performances of the Hydration Response Technology dressing: a new concept of debridement. J Wound Technology 2009;5:1-3.
16. Leveen, H. H., Falk, G., Borek, B. et al. Chemical acidification of wounds: an adjuvant to healing and the unfavorable action of alkalinity and ammonia. Ann Surg 1973;178:6, 745-753.
17. Evans, J. Hydration Response Technology and managing infection. J Community Nursing 2010;24:1, 15-16.
18. Wilson, I. A, Henry, M., Quill, R. D., Byrne, P. J. The pH of varicose ulcer surfaces and its relationship to healing. Vasa 1979;8:4 339-342.
19. Shukla, V. K., Shukla, D., Tiwary, S. K. et al. Evaluation of pH measurement as a method of wound assessment. J Wound Care 2007;16:7, 291-294.
20. Schultz, G., Mozingo, D., Romanelli, M., Claxton, K. Wound healing and TIME: new concepts and scientific applications. Wound Repair Regen 2005;13(Suppl 4): SI-SII.
21. Cutting, K. F., Acton, C., Dunwoody, G. et al. Clinical evaluation of a new high absorbency dressing. Poster presentation at European Wound Management Association (EWMA) conference, Lisbon, 2008.