Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 955-961

  Vag, Tibor ^a   Baltzer, Pascal A T ^a   Dietzel, Matthias ^a   Benndorf, Matthias ^a   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^a   Camara, Oumar ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ANALYSIS; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; BREAST MRI; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED ANALYSIS; CURVE TYPES; DETECTION RATES; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU; KINETIC ANALYSIS; KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS; KINETIC CURVES; KINETIC FEATURES; MASS ENHANCEMENT; ON DYNAMICS; REGION OF INTEREST;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; KINETICS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 77958054870     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841851.2010.508171     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Turnbull LW, Read J, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:599-603.
2. Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Perbeck L, Bone B. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. Acta Radiol 2002;43:275-281
3. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, Winston JS, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;197:387-395
4. Boné B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B. Sensitivity and specifi city of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol 1996;37:208-213
5. Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, Marx C, Facius M, et al. Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:964-970
6. Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, Malich A, Kaiser WA. Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: a retrospective study. Invest Radiol 2005;40:430-435
7. Kaiser WA. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques. Semin Roentgenol 2007;42: 228-235
8. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233:830-849
9. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110
10. Neubauer H, Li M, Kuehne-Heid R, Kaiser WA. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic fi ndings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 2003;76:3-12.
11. Szab ó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bon é B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003;44:379-386
12. Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, Bö ttcher J, Gajda M, Camara O, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2007;31: 394-400.
13. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370:485-492
14. Shiraishi A, Kurosaki Y, Maehara T, Suzuki M, Kurosumi M. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography. Magn Reson Med Sci 2003;31:159-163
15. Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapelyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specifi c gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol 2007;14:945-950
16. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007;245:684-691
17. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004;292:2735-2742
18. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specifi city without decreased sensitivity. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:51-56
19. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007;244:94-103.
20. Renz DM, Baltzer PA, Kullnig PM, Bö ttcher J, Vag T, Gajda M, et al. Clinical value of computer assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience. RoFo 2008;180:968-976
21. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fj ø sne H, Fougner R, Haugen OA, Petersen SB, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol 1992;31: 833-842
22. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis- correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1-8.
23. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretière JM, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon AA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:415-419
24. Guidi AJ, Fischer L, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:614-619
25. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-K öbrunner SH. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA 2000;11:129-137
26. Pabst T, Kenn W, Kaiser WA, Hahn D. Understanding why contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI is not reproducible: illustration with a simple phantom. Breast J 2001;7:166-170