Potential egg contamination by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive type 104 following experimental infection of pullets at the onset of lay

Poultry Science

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1629-1634

  Okamura, M ^a   Sonobe, M ^a   Obara, S ^a   Kubo, T ^a   Nagai, T ^a   Noguchi, M ^a   Takehara, K ^a   Nakamura, M ^a  

^a KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Egg contamination; Laying hen; Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive type 104

Indexed keywords

SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA ENTERICA SUBSP. ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 77957986664     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00774     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aabo, S., J. P. Christensen, M. S. Chadfield, B. Carstensen, J. E. Olsen, and M. Bisgaard. 2002. Quantitative comparison of intestinal invasion of zoonotic serotypes of Salmonella enterica in poultry. Avian Pathol. 31: 41-47.
2. Allen, C. A., P. J. Fedorka-Cray, A. Vazquez-Torres, M. Suyemoto, C. Altier, L. R. Ryder, F. C. Fang, and S. J. Libby. 2001. In vitro and in vivo assessment of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 virulence. Infect. Immun. 69: 4673-4677.
3. Braden, C. R. 2006. Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and eggs: A national epidemic in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43: 512-517.
4. Cogan, T. A., and T. J. Humphrey. 2003. The rise and fall of Salmonella Enteritidis in the UK. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94(Suppl.): 114S-119S.
5. Esaki, H., A. Morioka, K. Ishihara, A. Kojima, S. Shiroki, Y. Tamura, and T. Takahashi. 2004. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from cattle, swine and poultry (2001-2002): Report from the Japanese Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Program. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53: 266-270.
6. Golden, N. J., H. H. Marks, M. E. Coleman, C. M. Schroeder, N. E. Bauer Jr., and W. D. Schlosser. 2008. Review of induced molting by feed removal and contamination of eggs with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vet. Microbiol. 131: 215-228.
7. Guan, J., C. Grenier, and B. W. Brooks. 2006. In vitro study of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium definitive type 104: Survival in egg albumen and penetration through the vitelline membrane. Poult. Sci. 85: 1678-1681.
8. Helms, M., S. Ethelberg, and K. Molbak. 2005. International Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 infections, 1992-2001. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11: 859-867.
9. Humphrey, T. J., A. Baskerville, S. Mawer, B. Rowe, and S. Hopper. 1989. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 from the contents of intact eggs: A study involving naturally infected hens. Epidemiol. Infect. 103: 415-423.
10. Kawagoe, K., H. Mine, T. Asai, A. Kojima, K. Ishihara, K. Harada, M. Ozawa, H. Izumiya, J. Terajima, H. Watanabe, E. Honda, T. Takahashi, and T. Sameshima. 2007. Changes of multi-drug resistance pattern in Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates from food-producing animals in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 69: 1211-1213.
11. Leach, S. A., A. Williams, A. C. Davies, J. Wilson, P. D. Marsh, and T. J. Humphrey. 1999. Aerosol route enhances the contamination of intact eggs and muscle of experimentally infected laying hens by Salmonella typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 171: 203-207.
12. Miller, M. A. 1997. Widespread emergence in the United States of a multidrug resistant type of Salmonella typhimurium. FDA Vet. 12: 5-6.
13. Okamura, M., Y. Kamijima, T. Miyamoto, H. Tani, K. Sasai, and E. Baba. 2001a. Differences among six Salmonella serovars in abilities to colonize reproductive organs and to contaminate eggs in laying hens. Avian Dis. 45: 61-69.
14. Okamura, M., T. Miyamoto, Y. Kamijima, H. Tani, K. Sasai, and E. Baba. 2001b. Differences in abilities to colonize reproductive organs and to contaminate eggs in intravaginally inoculated hens and in vitro adherences to vaginal explants between Salmonella enteritidis and other Salmonella serovars. Avian Dis. 45: 962-971.
15. Okamura, M., H. Tachizaki, T. Kubo, S. Kikuchi, A. Suzuki, K. Takehara, and M. Nakamura. 2007. Comparative evaluation of a bivalent killed Salmonella vaccine to prevent egg contamination with Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, and Gallinarum biovar Pullorum, using 4 different challenge models. Vaccine 25: 4837-4844.
16. Poppe, C., K. Ziebell, L. Martin, and K. Allen. 2002. Diversity in antimicrobial resistance and other characteristics among Salmonella typhimurium DT104 isolates. Microb. Drug Resist. 8: 107-122.
17. Sameshima, T., M. Akiba, H. Izumiya, J. Terajima, K. Tamura, H. Watanabe, and M. Nakazawa. 2000. Salmonella typhimurium DT104 from livestock in Japan. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 53: 15-16.
18. Threlfall, E. J. 2002. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella: Problems and perspectives in food- and water-borne infections. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26: 141-148.
19. Threlfall, E. J., L. R. Ward, and B. Rowe. 1998. Multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium DT 104 and Salmonella bacteraemia. Lancet 352: 287-288.
20. Waltman, W. D., A. M. Horne, C. Pirkle, and T. G. Dickson. 1991. Use of delayed secondary enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in poultry and poultry environments. Avian Dis. 35: 88-92.
21. Wigley, P., S. D. Hulme, C. Powers, R. K. Beal, A. Berchieri Jr., A. Smith, and P. Barrow. 2005. Infection of the reproductive tract and eggs with Salmonella enterica serovar Pullorum in the chicken is associated with suppression of cellular immunity at sexual maturity. Infect. Immun. 73: 2986-2990.
22. Williams, A., A. C. Davies, J. Wilson, P. D. Marsh, S. Leach, and T. J. Humphrey. 1998. Contamination of the contents of intact eggs by Salmonella typhimurium DT104. Vet. Rec. 143: 562-563.