Concentration polarisation by natural organic matter (NOM) in NF and UF

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 233, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 79-91

  Thorsen, Thor ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Concentration polarisation; Mass balance; Nanofiltration; Natural organic matter; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

FILTRATION; FOULING; LIQUID MEMBRANES; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POTABLE WATER;

NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER (NOM);

ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

DRINKING WATER; ORGANIC MATTER;

DRINKING WATER; FOULING; LIQUID-SOLID SEPARATION; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC MATTER; POLARIZATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION PROCESS; FILTRATION; FOULING CONTROL; GLACIAL MASS BALANCE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICS; MEMBRANE; MIGRATION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PARTICLE SIZE; POLARIZATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 1842585133     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. T. Thorsen, Fundamental Studies of Membrane Filtration of Coloured Surface Water, Ph.D. thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, 1999.
2. T. Thorsen, T. Krogh, E. Bergan, Removal of Humic Substances with Membranes: System, Use and Experiences, AWWA Proceedings, 1993 Membrane Technology Conference, Baltimore, 1993.
3. M.L. Arora, B.M. Michalczyl, Pilot scale evaluation of ultrafiltration to remove humic substances from groundwater, 1986 Ann. Conf. Proc. AWWA.
4. Amy G.L., Alleman B.C., Cluff C.B. Removal of dissolved organic matter by nanofiltration. J. Environ. Eng. 116(1):1990;200.
5. J. Mallevialle, C. Anselme, O. Marsigny, Effects of humic substances on membrane processes, in: I.H. Suffet, P. MacCarty, (Eds.), Aquatic Humic Substances, American Chemical Society, Washington, 1989.
6. Howe K.J., Clark M.M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ. Sci. Techn. 36(16):2002;3571.
7. Fan L.F., Harris J.L., Roddick F.A., Booker N.A. Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Res. 35(18):2001;4455.
8. Seidel A., Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 203:2002;245.
9. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes. Desalination. 127:2000;283.
10. Cho J., Sohn J., Choi H., Amy G. Effects of molecular weight cutoff, f/k ratio (a hydrodynamic condition), and hydrophobic interactions on natural organic matter rejection and fouling in membranes. Aqua. 551(2):2002;109.
11. Howell J.A., Arnot T.C., Chua H.C., Godino P., Metsämuuronen S. Controlled flux behaviour of membrane processes. Macromol. Symp. 188:2002;23.
12. M.H.B. Hayes, P. MacCarthy, Malcolm, R.S. Swift, Humic substances. II. In search of structure, Wiley/Interscience, Chichester, 1989.
13. Ghosh K., Schnitzer M. Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Sci. 129:1980;266.
14. Burba P., Shkinev V., Spivakov B.Y. On-line fractionation and characterisation of humic substances by means of sequential-stage ultrafiltration. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 351:1995;74.
15. Kainulainen T., Tuhkanen T., Vatiainen T., Heinonen-Tanski H., Kalliokoski P. The effect of different oxidation and filtration processes on the molecular size distribution of humic material. Water Sci. Tech. 30(9):1994;169.
16. Dal-Cin M.M., McLellan F., Striez C.N., Tam C.M., Tweddle T.A., Kumar A. Membrane performance with pulp mill effluent: relative contribution of fouling mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci. 120:1996;273.
17. Nakao S. Determination of pore size and pore size distribution. 3. Filtration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 96:1994;131.
18. O. Smidsrød, S.T. Moe, Biopolymerkjemi, Tapir forlag, Trondheim, 1995.
19. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behaviour of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96:1994;1.
20. Lahoussine-Turcaud V., Wiesner M.R., Bottero J. Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafiltration: the effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreatment. J. Membr. Sci. 52:1990;173.
21. Trettin D.R., Doshi M.R. Limiting flux in ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 4:1980;507.
22. De S., Bhattacharaya P.K. Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the application of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 128:1997;119.
23. Romero C.A., Davis R.H. Global model of crossflow microfiltration based on hydrodynamic diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 39:1988;117.
24. Otis J.R., Altena F.R., Mahar J.J., Belfort G. Measurement of single spherical particle trajectories with lateral migration in a slit with one porous wall under laminar flow conditions. Exp. Fluids. 4:1986;1.
25. Österberg R., Szajdak L. Temperature-dependent restructuring of fractal humic acids: a proton-dependent process. Environ. Int. 20(1):1994;77.
26. Caceci M.S., Billon A. Evidence for large organic scatterers (50-200 nm) in humic acid samples. Org. Geochem. 11(3):1990;335.
27. Costa A.R., Fane A.G., Wiley D.E. Spacer characterisation and pressure drop modelling in spacer-filled channels for ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 87:1996;79.
28. R.F. Probstein, Physicochemical Hydrodynamics, second ed., Wiley, New York, 1994.
29. Thorsen T., Concentration polarisation by NOM - a theoretical study, 3rd Nanofiltration and Applications Workshop, Helsinki University of Technology, Lappeenranta, 2001.
30. P.C. Hiemenz, R. Rajagopalan, Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997.
31. D.M. Owen, G.L. Amy, Z.K. Chowdhury, Characterisation of natural organic matter and its relationship to treatability, AWWA Study Report, Denver, 1993.
32. Chang Y.-J., Benjamin M.M. Modelling formation of natural organic matter fouling layers on ultrafiltration membranes. J. Environ. Eng. 129(1):2003;25.