Cleaning results characterized by flux, streaming potential and FTIR measurements

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Volumn 138, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 309-321

  Zhu, Huihua ^a   Nyström, Marianne ^a  

^a LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Charge characterization; Cleaning; Cleaning agents; Flux; Ultrafiltration membranes

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; AGENTS; CAUSTIC SODA; CHEMICAL CLEANING; FOULING; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PH EFFECTS; POLYSULFONES; PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; STREAMING POTENTIAL; ZETA POTENTIAL;

POLYMERIC MEMBRANES;

ADSORPTION; CLEANING; CONFERENCE PAPER; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 0032527875     PISSN: 09277757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00072-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Trägårdh G. Membrane cleaning. Desalination. 71:1989;325.
2. Ebrahim S., EI-Dessouky H. Evaluation of commercial cleaning agents for seawater reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination. 99:1994;169-188.
3. J.L. Siler, A comparison of reverse osmosis membrane cleaning methods (u), Report DE 93004536 (WSRC-RP-92-056), 1992.
4. Bartlett M., Bird M.R., Howell J.A. An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model. J. Membr. Sci. 105:1995;147-157.
5. Kerbage R., Mietton-Peuchot M., Ben Aim R. Evaluation de l'efficacite de nettoyage des membranes par la mesure de distribution de pores actifs. Recents Prog. Genie Procedes. 15(5):1991;61-66.
6. M.J. Muñoz-Aguado, D.E. Wiley, A.G. Fane, Optimal cleaning conditions for proteinaceous membrane foulants, Proc. Euromembrane '95, Bath, UK, II-79-II-82.
7. Kim K.J., Fane A.G. Performance evaluation of surface hydrophilized novel ultrafiltration membranes using aqueous proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 99:1995;149-162.
8. G. Salazar, M.A. Argüello, F.A. Riera, R. Alvarez, J.P. Labbé, A. Quémerais, Chemical cleaning of inorganic membrane: Rinsing and acid steps, Proc. Euromembrane '95, Bath, UK, II-87-II-90.
9. M.A. Argüello, G. Salazar, F.A. Riera, R. Alvarez, S. Bouhallab, G. Daufin, A. Quémerais, J.P. Labbé, Enzymatic cleaning of inorganic membranes, Proc. Euromembrane '95, Bath, UK, II-55-II-58.
10. Jacobs E.P., Swart P., Brouchaert G.J., Hart O.O. Membrane performance restoration I: Abattoir process streams, cleaning regimes for UF-membranes. Water SA. 19(2):1993;127-132.
11. Scott K., Adhamy A., Atteck W., Davidson C. Crossflow microfiltration of organic/water suspensions. Wat. Res. 28(1):1994;137-145.
12. G. Jonsson, P.L. Johansen, Selectivity of ultrafiltration membranes: Influence of fouling and cleaning conditions, Membr. Proc. Indo-EC Workshop 1991, pp. 165-184.
13. Kim K.J., Sun P., Chen V., Wiley D.E., Fane A.G. The cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 80:1993;241.
14. M. Nyström, H. Zhu, Characterization of cleaning results using combined flux and streaming potential methods, submitted.
15. Nyström M., Pihlajamäki A., Ehsani N. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 87:1994;245-256.