A phrase-based alignment model for natural language inference

EMNLP 2008 - 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 802-811

  MacCartney, Bill ^a   Galley, Michel ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

ALIGNMENT PROBLEMS; LEXICAL RESOURCES; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENTS; SEMANTIC EQUIVALENCES; SUPERVISED TRAININGS; TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77957870012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1613715.1613817     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, B. Dolan, L. Ferro, D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, and I. Szpektor. 2006. The Second PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
2. R. Bar-Haim, I. Dagan, I. Greental, and E. Shnarch. 2007. Semantic Inference at the Lexical-Syntactic Level. In Proceedings of AAAI-07.
3. A. Birch, C. Callison-Burch, M. Osborne, and P. Koehn. 2006. Constraining the Phrase-Based, Joint Probability Statistical Translation Model. In Proceedings of the ACL-06 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.
4. C. Brockett. 2007. Aligning the RTE 2006 Corpus. Technical Report MSR-TR-2007-77, Microsoft Research.
5. P. F. Brown, S. D. Pietra, V. J. D. Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1993. The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263-311.
6. N. Chambers, D. Cer, T. Grenager, D. Hall, C. Kiddon, B. MacCartney, M. C. de Marneffe, D. Ramage, E. Yeh, and C. D. Manning. 2007. Learning Alignments and Leveraging Natural Logic. In Proceedings of the ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
7. M. Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models. In Proceedings of EMNLP-02.
8. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment.
9. J. DeNero and D. Klein. 2008. The Complexity of Phrase Alignment Problems. In Proceedings of ACL/HLT-08: Short Papers, pages 25-28.
10. J. DeNero, D. Gillick, J. Zhang, and D. Klein. 2006. Why Generative Phrase Models Underperform Surface Heuristics. In Proceedings of the ACL-06Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 31-38.
11. B. Dolan, C. Quirk, and C. Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora. In Proceedings of COLING-04.
12. A. Fraser and D. Marcu. 2007. Measuring Word Alignment Quality for Statistical Machine Translation. Computational Linguistics, 33(3):293-303.
13. O. Glickman, I. Dagan, and M. Koppel. 2005. Web based probabilistic textual entailment. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment.
14. A. Hickl and J. Bensley. 2007. A Discourse Commitment-Based Framework for Recognizing Textual Entailment. In ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, Prague.
15. A. Hickl, J. Williams, J. Bensley, K. Roberts, B. Rink, and Y. Shi. 2006. Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCC's GROUNDHOG System. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment.
16. J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. 1997. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics.
17. V. Jijkoun and M. de Rijke. 2005. Recognizing textual entailment using lexical similarity. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, pages 73-76.
18. P. Koehn, H. Hoang, A. Birch, C. Callison-Burch, M. Federico, N. Bertoldi, B. Cowan, W. Shen, C. Moran, R. Zens, et al. 2007. Moses: Open sourcetoolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL-07, demonstration session.
19. P. Liang, B. Taskar, and D. Klein. 2006. Alignment by Agreement. In Proceedings of NAACL-06, New York.
20. D. Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL-98, pages 768-774, Montreal, Canada.
21. B. MacCartney, T. Grenager, M. C. de Marneffe, D. Cer, and C. D. Manning. 2006. Learning to Recognize Features of Valid Textual Entailments. In Proceedings of NAACL-06, New York.
22. D. Marcu and W. Wong. 2002. A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP-02, pages 133-139.
23. E. Marsi and E. Krahmer. 2005. Classification of semantic relations by humans and machines. In ACL-05 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, Ann Arbor.
24. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-51.
25. M. Tatu and D. Moldovan. 2007. COGEX at RTE3. In Proceedings of ACL-07.
26. S. Vogel, H. Ney, and C. Tillmann. 1996. HMMbased word alignment in statistical translation. In Proceedings of COLING-96, pages 836-841, Copenhagen, Denmark.