Andrology lab corner: Sperm proteomics: Thinking outside the collision cell

Journal of Andrology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 431-433

  Oxenham, Senga K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

BIOINFORMATICS; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CYTOLYSIS; FERTILIZATION; HUMAN; MALE INFERTILITY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY; SPERMATOZOON; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; INSTRUMENTATION; LAB ON A CHIP; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROFLUIDICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROFLUIDICS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 77957850767     PISSN: 01963635     EISSN: 19394640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.110.010231     Document Type: Short Survey

References (26)

1. Aebersold R. A stress test for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods. 2009;6(6):411-412.
2. Aitken RJ, Baker MA. The role of proteomics in understanding sperm cell biology. Int J Androl. 2007;31:295-302.
3. Auger J, Eustache F, Ducot B, Blandin T, Daudin M, Diaz I, Matribi SE, Gony B, Keskes L, Kolbezen M, Lamarte A, Lornage J, Nomal N, Pitaval G, Simon O, Virant-Klun I, Spira A, Jouannet P. Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(11):2360-2368.
4. Barratt CLR. The human sperm proteome: the potential for new biomarkers of male fertility and a transformation in our understanding of the spermatozoon. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(6):1240-1241.
5. Bell AW, Deutsch EW, Au CE, Kearney RE, Beavis R, Sechi S, Nilsson T, Bergeron JJ, HUPO Test Sample Working Group. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods. 2009;6(6):423-430.
6. Björndahl L, Barratt CLR. Semen analysis: setting standards for the measurement of sperm numbers. J Androl. 2005;26(1):11.
7. Björndahl L, Tomlinson M, Barratt CLR. Raising the standards in semen analysis: professional and personal responsibility. J Androl. 2004;25(6):11.
8. Brazil C, Swan SH, Tollner CR, Treece C, Drobnis EZ, Wang C, Redmon JB, Overstreet JW, Study for Future Families Research Group. Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study FUTURE. J Androl. 2004;25(4):645-656.
9. Brewis I, Gadella B. Sperm surface proteomics: from protein lists to biological function. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(2):68-79.
10. Brown RB, Audet J. Current techniques for single cell lysis. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:S131-S138.
11. Cañas B, Lopez-Ferrer D, Ramos-Fernandez A, Camafeita E, Calvo E. Mass spectrometry technologies for proteomics. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006;4(4):295-320.
12. Cohen AA, Gevaq-Zatorsky N, Eden E, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Issaeva I, Sigal A, Milo R, Cohen-Saidon C, Liron Y, Kam Z, Cohen L, Danon T, Persov N, Alon U. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science. 2008;322(5907):1511-1516.
13. Harper C, Wootton L, Michelangeli F, Lefièvre L, Barratt C, Publicover S. Secretory pathway Ca2+-ATPase (SPCA1) Ca2+ pumps, not SERCAs, regulate complex [Ca2+]i signals in human spermatozoa. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1673-1685.
14. Keel BA. How reliable are results from the semen analysis? Fertil Steril. 2004;82:41-44.
15. Keel BA, Quinn P, Schmidt CF, Serafy NT Jr, Serafy NT Sr, Schalue TK. Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts national proficiency testing program in andrology. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:680-686. (Pubitemid 30142384)
16. Lai H, Quinto-Su PA, Sims CE, Bachman M, Li GP, Venugopalan V, Allbritton NL. Characterisation and use of laser-based lysis for cell analysis on-chip. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:S113-S121.
17. Lefièvre L, Machado-Oliveira G, Ford C, Kirkman-Brown J, Barratt C, Publicover S. Communication between female tract and sperm. Saying NO* when you mean yes. Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2(2):82-85.
18. Mann M, Kelleher NL. Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18132-18138.
19. Neubauer G, Mann M. Parent ion scans of large molecules. J Mass Spectrom. 1997;32:94-98. (Pubitemid 27046478)
20. Oliva R, deMateo S, Estanyol JM. Sperm cell proteomics. Proteomics. 2009;9:1004-1017.
21. Proteomics 2.0. Secret Insights to Translational Proteomics Success. Available at: http://proteomics2.com/?p=142. Accessed August 2, 2010.
22. Roeder I, Radtke F. Stem cell biology meets system biology. Development. 2009;136:3525-3530.
23. Sedgwick H, Caron F, Monaghan PB, Kolch W, Cooper JM. Lab-on-a-chip technologies for proteomic analysis from isolated cells. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:S123-S130.
24. Smith DJ, Gaffney EA, Gadelha H, Kapur N, Kirkman-Brown JC. Bend propagation in the flagella of migrating human sperm, and its modulation by viscosity. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66(4):220-236.
25. Turck CW, Falick AM, Kowalak JA, Lane WS, Lilley KS, Phinney BS, Weintraub ST, Witkowska EH, Yates NA. ABRF-PRG2006 study: relative protein quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomic. 2007;6:1291-1298.
26. Williamson BL, Marchese J, Morrice NA. Automated identification and quantification of protein phosphorylation sites by LC/MS on a hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteom. 2006;5(2):337-346. (Pubitemid 43329311)