The impact of augmented information on Visuo-motor adaptation in younger and older adults

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Hegele, Mathias ^a   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; ADAPTATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PROPRIOCEPTION; ROTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957794695     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012071     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Redding G, Wallace B (1996) Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic control.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(2): 379-394.
2. Welch RB (1978) Perceptual modification. Adapting to altered sensoryenvironments. New York: Academic Press. 346 p.
3. Bock O (1992) Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensory-motor discordance:Evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behav Brain Res 51(1): 41-50.
4. Bock O, Burghoff M (1997) Visuo-motor adaptation: evidence for a distributedamplitude control system. Behav Brain Res 89(1-2): 267-273.
5. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotortransformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20(23):8916-8924.
6. Abeele S, Bock O (2001) Mechanisms for sensorimotor adaptation to rotatedvisual input. Exp Brain Res 139(2): 248-253.
7. Abeele S, Bock O (2001) Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input:different mechanisms for small versus large rotations. Exp Brain Res 140(4):407-410.
8. Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial mappingssuggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform15(3): 493-506.
9. Imamizu H, Shimojo S (1995) The locus of visual-motor learning at the task ormanipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer. J Exp Psychol HumPercept Perform 21(4): 719-733.
10. Pennel I, Coello Y, Orliaguet JP (2002) Frame of reference and adaptation todirectional bias in a video-controlled reaching task. Ergonomics 45(15):1047-1077.
11. Bock O (2005) Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderlysubjects. Exp Brain Res 160(2): 259-263.
12. Bock O, Girgenrath M (2006) Relationship between sensorimotor adaptationand cognitive functions in younger and older subjects. Exp Brain Res 169(3):400-406.
13. Buch ER, Young S, Contreras-Vidal JL (2003) Visuomotor adaptation innormal aging. Learn Mem 10(1): 55-63.
14. McNay EC, Willingham DB (1998) Deficit in learning of a motor skill requiringstrategy, but not of perceptuomotor recalibration, with aging. Learn Mem 4(5):411-420.
15. Seidler RD (2006) Differential effects of age on sequence learning andsensorimotor adaptation. Brain Res Bull 70(4-6): 337-346.
16. Heuer H, Hegele M (2008) Adaptation to visuo-motor rotations in younger andolder adults. Psychol Aging 23(1): 190-202.
17. Heuer H, Hegele M (2007) Learning new visuo-motor gains at early and lateworking age. Ergonomics 50(7): 979-1003.
18. Hegele M, Heuer H (2010) Adaptation to a direction-dependent visuomotorgain in the young and elderly. Psych Res 74(1): 21-34.
19. Heuer H (1983) Bewegungslernen [Movement Learning]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
20. Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models formotor control. Neural Networks 11: 1317-1329.
21. Hegele M, Heuer H (2010) Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptationto visuomotor rotations. Conscious Cogn. In press.
22. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2006) An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategyduring visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26(14): 3642-3645.
23. Suelzenbrueck S, Heuer H (2009) Functional independence of explicit andimplicit motor adjustments. Conscious Cogn 18(1): 145-159.
24. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1989) Trajectories of reaches to prismaticallydisplacedtargets: evidence for automatic visuomotor recalibration. Exp BrainRes 78(3): 575-87.
25. Uhlarik JJ (1973) Role of cognitive factors on adaptation to prismaticdisplacement. J Exp Psychol 98(2): 223-32.
26. Michel C, Pisella L, Prablanc C, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2007) Enhancingvisuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: Single-step (aware) versusmultiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. J Cogn Neurosci 19(2):341-350.
27. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne ́ A, Li L, et al. (1998) Prism adaptation to arightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature395(6698): 166-169.
28. Hay JC, Pick HL (1966) Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to opticaldisplacement of the visual stimulus. J Exp Psychol 71(1): 150-158.
29. Redding G, Rossetti Y, Wallace B (2005) Applications of prism adaptation: Atutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29(3): 431-444.
30. Cohen MM (1967) Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prismaftereffects. Percept Mot Skills 24(3): 1295-1302.
31. Cohen MM (1974) Changes in auditory localization following prismaticexposure under continuous and terminal visual feedback. Percept Mot Skills38(3): 1202.
32. Uhlarik JJ, Canon LK (1971) Influence of concurrent and terminal exposureconditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. J Exp Psychol 91(2): 233-239.
33. Kelso JA, Cook E, Olson ME, Epstein W (1975) Allocation of attention and thelocus of adaptation to displaced vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1(3):237-45.
34. Redding GM, Wallace B (1988) Components of prism adaptation in terminaland concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop.Percept Psychophys 44(1): 59-68.
35. Redding GM, Wallace B (1996) Adaptive spatial realignment and strategicperceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(2): 379-394.
36. Ishihara S (2005) Ishihara's tests for colour deficiency. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara.
37. Salthouse TA (2006) Mental exercise and mental aging. Evaluating the use it orlose it hypothesis. Perspect Psychol Sci 1(1): 68-87.
38. Tewes U (1991) Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest fü r Erwachsene [WechslerIntelligence Scale for Adults] (Rev Ed). Toronto: Huber.
39. Amthauer R (1953) I-S-T Intelligenz-Struktur-Test. [Intelligence Structure Test]Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
40. Schoppe KJ (1974) Das MLS-Gerät. Ein neuer Testapparat zur Messungfeinmotorischer Leistungen. [The MLS apparatus. A new testing device tomeasure fine motor skills]. Diagnostica 20: 43-46.
41. Vercruyssen M (1997) Movement control and speed of behavior. In: Fisk AD,Rogers WA, eds. Handbook of human factors and the older adult. San Diego:Academic Press. pp 55-86.
42. Suelzenbrueck S, Hegele M, Heuer H, Rinkenauer G (2010) Evidence from atracing task. Occup Ergon. In press.
43. Brainard DH (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433-436.
44. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics:Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: 437-442.
45. Greenhouse S, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika 24: 95-112.
46. Riby LM, Perfect TJ, Stollery BT (2004) The effects of age and task domain ondual task performance: a meta-analysis. Euro J Cogn Psychol 16(6): 863-891.
47. Wong T, Henriques DYP (2009) Visuomotor adaptation does not recalibratekinesthetic sense of felt hand path. J Neurophysiol 101(2): 614-623