The correlation between ultrasonographic findings and pathologic features in breast disorders

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 905-912

  Tamaki, Kentaro ^a,b,c   Sasano, Hironobu ^b   Ishida, Takanori ^a   Ishida, Kazuyuki ^b   Miyashita, Minoru ^a   Takeda, Motohiro ^a   Amari, Masakazu ^a   Harada Shoji, Narumi ^a   Kawai, Masaaki ^a   Hayase, Toshiyuki ^d   Tamaki, Nobumitsu ^c   Ohuchi, Noriaki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c Nahanishi Clinic   (Japan)

^d TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast ultrasound; Carcinoma extension; Histopathologic findings

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CARCINOMA CELL; CELL PROLIFERATION; COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROBLAST; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERPLASIA; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STROMA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 77957717870     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq070     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Tumor of the Breast and Females Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press.
2. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), Ultrasound, 4th edn. Reston, VA: ACR. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/BIRADSAtlas/BIRADSAtlasexcerptedtext/BIRADSUItrasoundFirstEdition/ACRBIRADSUSLexiconClassificationFormDoc1.aspx (2 May 2010, date last accessed).
3. Tsunoda HS, Tohno E, Ueno E. Examination of effectiveness of breast cancer detection by modalities and age groups. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen 1998;7:281-5.
4. Osako T, Takahashi K, Iwase T, Iijima K, Miyagi Y, Nishimura S, et al. Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years. Breast Cancer 2007;14:229-33.
5. Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG. Ultrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol 2000;10:562-1568.
6. Chao TC, Lo YF, Chen SC, Chen MF. Prospective sonographic study of 3039 breast tumors. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:363-70.
7. Ishida T, Furuta A, Moriya T, Ohuchi N. Pathological assessment of intraductal spread of carcinoma in relation to surgical margin state in breast-conserving surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2003;33:61-166.
8. Ohuchi N. Breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer: a principle based on segmental anatomy. Tohoku J Exp Med 1999;108:03-118.
9. Tsunoda-Shimizu H, Ueno E, Tohno E. Ultrasonographic evaluation for breast conservative therapy. Jpn J Breast Cancer 1996;11:649-55.
10. Kamio T, Kameoka S, Hamano K, Kimura T. Indication for breast conservative surgery by ultrasonography. Jpn J Breast Cancer 1996;11:656-64.
11. Amano G, Yajima M, Moroboshi Y, Kuriya Y, Ohuchi N. MRI accurately depicts underlying DCIS in a patient with Paget's disease of the breast without palpable mass and mammography findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:49-153.
12. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:90-197.
13. Harada-Shoji N, Yamada T, Ishida T, Amari M, Suzuki A, Moriya T, et al. Usefulness of lesion image mapping with multidetector-row helical computed tomography using a dedicated skin marker in breast-conserving surgery. Eur Radiol 2009;19:868-74.
14. Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology. Guideline for Breast Ultrasound-Management and Diagnosis, 2nd edn. Tokyo: Japanese 2008.
15. Sakamoto G, Inaji H, Akiyama F, Haga S, Hiraoka M, Inai K, et al. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer 2005. Breast Cancer 2005;12(Suppl.): S1-27.
16. Rosen PP. Rosen's Breast Pathology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.
17. Amano G, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T, Ishida T, Amari M, et al. Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;60:3-55.
18. Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, Franceschini G, La Torre G, Bonomo L. Solid breast mass characterization: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification. Radiol med 2007;112:877-94.
19. Koushi N. Basis of Ultrasound Diagnostic System and Technology. Tokyo: Japanese 2009.
20. Leucht WJ, Rade DR, Humbert KD. Diagnostic value of different interpretative criteria in real-time sonography of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988;14:59-73.
21. Jackson VP. Sonography of malignant breast disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1989;10:119-31.
22. Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology 1983;146:731.
23. Kobayashi T. Diagnostic ultrasound in breast cancer: analysis of retro-tumorous echo patterns correlated with sonic attenuation by cancerous connective tissue. JCU J Clin Ultrasound 1979;7:471-9.
24. Lee CH. Problem solving MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin N Am 2004;42:919-34.
25. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002;184:383-93.
26. Lindley R, Bulman A, Parsons P, Phillips R, Henry K, Ellis H. Histologic features predictive of an increased risk of early local recurrence of treatment of breast cancer by local tumour excision and radical radiotherapy. Surgery 1989;105:13-20.