Improving the shuffled complex evolution scheme for optimization of complex nonlinear hydrological systems: Application to the calibration of the Sacramento soil-moisture accounting model

Water Resources Research

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Chu, Wei ^a   Gao, Xiaogang ^a   Sorooshian, Soroosh ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECT; EVOLUTIONARY SEARCH; HYDROLOGIC FEATURES; HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM; INNOVATIVE ALGORITHMS; MISSISSIPPI; MODEL PARAMETERS; NON-STATIONARY POINTS; OPTIMAL PARAMETER; PARAMETER SPACES; PARTICLE POPULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS; RIVER BASINS; ROOT-MEAN-SQUARED; SHUFFLED COMPLEX EVOLUTION;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SOIL MOISTURE; THREE TERM CONTROL SYSTEMS; WATERSHEDS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL WATER; WATERSHED;

CALIFORNIA; LEAF BASIN; MISSISSIPPI; SACRAMENTO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957717377     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009224     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beven, K. J., and A. M. Binley (1992), The future ofdistributed models: Model calibration and predictive uncertainty, Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279-298.
2. Beven, K. J., and J. Freer (2001), Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249(1-4), 11-29.
3. Brazil, L. E. (1988), Multilevel calibration strategy for complex hydrologic simulation models, Ph.D. dissertation, Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
4. Chapman, T.(1991), Comment on "Evaluation of Automated Techniques for Base Flow and Recession Analyses" by R. J. Nathan and T. A. McMahon, Water Resour. Res., 27(7), 1783-1784, doi:10.1029/91WR01007.
5. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta (1992), Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015-1031, doi:10.1029/91WR02985.
6. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta (1994), Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158(3-4), 265-284.
7. Dunteman, G. H. (1989), Principal Components Analysis, 97 pp., Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, Calif
8. Eberhart, R. C., and J. Kennedy (1995), A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine andHuman Science, pp. 39-43, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, N. J.
9. Gan, T. Y., and S. J. Burges (1990a), An assessment of a conceptual rainfall-runoffmodels ability to represent the dynamics of small hypo-thetical catchments, 1. Models, model properties, and experimental design, Water Resour. Res., 26(7), 1595-1604, doi:10.1029/WR026i007p01595.
10. Gan, T. Y., and S. J. Burges (1990b), An assessment of a conceptual rainfall-runoffmodels ability to represent the dynamics of small hypothet-ical catchments, 2. Hydrologic responses for normal and extreme rainfall, Water Resour. Res., 26(7), 1605-1619, doi:10.1029/WR026i007p01605.
11. Goldberg, D. E., and J. H. Holland (1988), Genetic algorithms and machine learning, Machine Learning, 3(2-3), 95-99.
12. Gupta, V. K., and S. Sorooshian (1983), Uniqueness and observability ofcon-ceptual rainfall-runoffmodel parameters: The percolation process exam-ined, Water Resour. Res.,19(1),269-276,doi:10.1029/WR019i001p00269.
13. Gupta, V. K., and S. Sorooshian (1985), The automatic calibration ofconcep-tual catchment models using derivative-based optimization algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 21(4), 473-486, doi:10.1029/WR021i004p00473.
14. Liang, J. J., P. N. Suganthan, and K. Deb (2005), Novel composition test functions for numerical global optimization, Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 68-75, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, N. J.
15. Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead (1965), A simplex method for function minimi-zation, Comput. J., 7, 308-313.
16. Sorooshian, S., and V. K. Gupta (1983), Automatic calibration ofconcep-tual rainfall-runoffmodels: The question ofparameter observability and uniqueness, Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 251-259, doi:10.1029/WR019i001p00260.
17. Sorooshian, S., V. K. Gupta, and J. L. Fulton (1983), Evaluation ofmaxi-mum likelihood parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoffmodels: Influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility, Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 251-259, doi:10.1029/ WR019i001p00251.
18. Sorooshian, S., Q. Duan, and V. K. Gupta (1993), Calibration ofrainfall-runoffmodels: application ofglobal optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 1185-1194, doi:10.1029/92WR02617. (Pubitemid 23383855)
19. Storn, R., and K. Price (1997), Differential evolution: A simple and effi-cient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim., 11(4), 341-359.
20. Suganthan, P. N., N. Hansen, J. J. Liang, K. Deb, Y. P. Chen, A. Auger, and S. Tiwari (2005), Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteriafor the CEC-2005 Special Session on Real-Parameter Optimization, pp. 1-50, Nanyang Technol. Univ., Singapore.
21. Thiemann, M., M. Trosset, H. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian (2001), Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 37(10), 2521-2535, doi:10.1029/2000WR900405. (Pubitemid 32908202)
22. Thyer, M., G. Kuczera, and B. C. Bates (1999), Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: a comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 35(3), 767-773, doi:10.1029/1998WR900058. (Pubitemid 29111806)
23. Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian (2003), A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment ofhydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1201, doi:10.1029/2002WR001642.
24. Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, S. C. Dekker, S. Sorooshian, T. Wagener, and W. Bouten (2006), Application of stochastic parameter optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model, J. Hydrol., 325(1-4), 288-307.