High school students' perceptions of argumentation

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 3971-3975

  Kaya, Ebru ^a,b   Erduran, Sibel ^c   Cetin, Pinar Seda ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; science education; students' perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957712901     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.625     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Chin, C. S. (2008). Current practices of scientific discourse and argumentation in science education: A mixed methods investigation based in Brunei Darussalam. Unpublished master thesis. University of Bristol.
2. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
3. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
4. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. (Pubitemid 39558160)
5. Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.) (2008). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
6. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Critical perspectives on literacy and education. London: Falmer Press.
7. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: an overview. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
8. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
9. Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science calssrooms. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman., Handbook of Research on Science Education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as a sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883-915.
11. Koballa, Jr., T. R., Crawley, F. E., & Shrigley, R. L. (1990). A summary of science education-1988. Science Education, 74(3), 369-381.
12. Newton, P. Driver, R. & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
13. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. (Pubitemid 37496912)
14. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. (Pubitemid 40002954)
15. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
16. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260. (Pubitemid 43135580)
17. Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18.
18. von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J. & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131. (Pubitemid 351189813)