An electronic government model based on case study approach

Electronic Government

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 421-432

  Yadav, Nagendra ^a   Yadav, Hemant ^b  

^a UPRT Open University   (India)

^b Khandelwal College of Management Science and Technology   (India)

Author keywords

accountability; decentralisation; e government; online services; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957683732     PISSN: 17407494     EISSN: 17407508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/EG.2009.027787     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burn, J. and Robins, G. (2003) ‘Moving towards e-government: a case study of organizational change processes’, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.25–35.
2. Heeks, R. (2003) Most E-Government-for-Development Projects Fail: How can Risks be Reduced? Paper no. 14, i-Government Working Paper Series, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester.
3. Shankry Nagarajan (2005) The evaluation in the ICT government in Macau, University Utara Malaysia.
4. Aichholzer, G. and Schmutzer, R. (2000) ‘Organisational challenges to the development of electronic government’, Paper presented at the 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, IEEE Computer Society, London.
5. Bonham, G., Seifert, J. and Thorson, S. (2001) ‘The transformational potential of e-government: the role of political leadership’, Paper presented at the 4th Pan-European International Relations Conference, University of Kent.
6. Chen, H. (2002) ‘Digital government: technologies and practices’, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.223–227.
7. Chen, M. (2003) ‘Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and web services standards for e-business systems’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp.259–279.
8. Chesher, M., Chesher, M. and Kaura, R. (2003) Electronic Business & Commerce, Springer, London.
9. Chircu, A.M. and Lee, D.H-D. (2008) ‘E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework’, Electronic Government, An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.345–363.
10. Ciborra, C.U. (2003) Unveiling E-Government and Development: Governing at a Distance in the New War, Working Paper 126, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Available online at: http://is.lse.ac.uk/wp/pdf/WP126.PDF.
11. Criado, J.I. and Ramilo, M.C. (2003) ‘E-government in practice: an analysis of website orientation to the citizens in Spanish municipalities’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp.191–218.
12. Evans, D. and Yen, D.C. (2005) E-Government: An Analysis for Implementation: Framework for Understanding Cultural and Social Impact. AGIM Office, pp.29–41.
13. Faisal, Mohd. N. and Rahman, Z. (2008) ‘E-government in India: modelling the barriers to its adoption and diffusion’, ISSN (Print): 1740-7494, Vol. 5, No. 2.
14. Grant, G. and Chau, D. (2005) ‘Developing a generic framework for e-government’, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, p.1.
15. Guijarro, L. (2007) ‘Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States’, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.89–101.
16. Ho, A.L. (2003) ‘EO allots 1–2% of RP budget to e-government spending’, Inquirer News Service, 23 January.
17. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (2004, March) Digital 21 Strategy: Sustainability and Opportunities, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
18. Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F. and Pernul, G. (2003) ‘Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy’, Computer Communications, Vol. 26, No. 16, pp.1873–1883.
19. Sanchez, A. and Koh, C. (2003) ‘The relationship between IT for communication and e-government barriers’, Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL.
20. Taylor Walsh, R. (2006) ‘Development of a community information service. The National Capital Area Public Access Network (Cap Access) – a work in progress’, Internet Research, Vol. 3, pp.41–59.
21. Wu, R. (2007) ‘Enterprise integration in e-government’, ISSN (Print): 1740-7494, Vol. 4, No. 2.
22. Yu, C. and Hu, P.J-H. (2007) ‘Examining the impacts of institutional framework on e-government infrastructures: a study of Hong Kong experiences’, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.