Visual regulation of manual aiming: A comparison of methods

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1087-1095

  Elliott, Digby ^a,b   Hansen, Steve ^c  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77957656754     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1087     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bard, C., Hay, L., & Fleury, M. (1985). Role of peripheral vision in the directional control of rapid aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 151-161. doi:10.1037/h0080120
2. Beggs, W. D. A., & Howarth, C. I. (1972). The accuracy of aiming at a target: Some further evidence for a theory of intermittent control. Acta Psychologica, 36, 171-177. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(72)90001-7
3. Carlton, L. G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4. Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365-401. doi:10.1016/0167 -9457(93)90026-L
5. Elliott, D., & Allard, F. (1985). The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 407-425. doi:10.1080/ 14640748508400942
6. Elliott, D., Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (1999). The control of goal-directed limb movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory. Human Movement Science, 18, 121-136. doi:10.1016/S0167 -9457(99)00004-4
7. Elliott, D., Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Chua, R. (1991). Discrete versus continuous visual control of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 10, 393-418. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90013-N
8. Elliott, D., Chua, R., Pollock, B. J., & Lyons, J. (1995). Optimizing the use of vision in manual aiming: The role of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 72-83. doi:10.1080/14640749508401376
9. Elliott, D., Hansen, S., Mendoza, J., & Tremblay, L. (2004). Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: A framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 339-351. doi:10.3200/ JMBR.36.3.339-351
10. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.342
11. Ghez, C., Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., & Sainburg, R. (1995). Contributions of vision and proprioception to accuracy of limb movements. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 549-564). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Grierson, L. E. M., & Elliott, D. (2009). Goal-directed aiming and the relative contribution of two online control processes. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 309-324.
13. Hansen, S., & Elliott, D. (2009). Three-dimensional manual responses to unexpected target perturbations during rapid aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 16-29.
14. Hansen, S., Elliott, D., & Khan, M. A. (2007). Comparing derived and acquired acceleration profiles: 3-D optical electronic data analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 748-754.
15. Hansen, S., Elliott, D., & Khan, M. A. (2008). Quantifying the variability of three-dimensional aiming movements using ellipsoids. Motor Control, 12, 241-251.
16. Hansen, S., Elliott, D., & Tremblay, L. (2007). On-line control of discrete action following visual perturbation. Perception, 36, 268-287. doi:10.1068/p5629
17. Hansen, S., Glazebrook, C. M., Anson, J. G., Weeks, D. J., & Elliott, D. (2006). The influence of advance information about target knowledge and visual feedback on movement planning and execution. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 200-208. doi:10.1037/cjep2006019
18. Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9, 281-311.
19. Heath, M., Hodges, N. J., Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1998). On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 163-173. doi:10.1037/h0087289
20. Heath, M., Westwood, D. A., & Binsted, G. (2004). The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Motor Control, 8, 76-106.
21. Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387-403. doi:10.1037/h0026739
22. Khan, M. A., Elliott, D., Coull, J., Chua, R., & Lyons, J. (2002). Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: Kinematic evidence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 45-57. doi:10.1080/00222890209601930
23. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., Lawrence, G. P., Chua, R., Bernier, P.-M., et al. (2006). Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target directed movements from kinematic data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 1106-1121. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.002
24. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependence between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 425-444. doi:10.1080/713755756
25. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113, 83-97. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00156-7
26. Mendoza, J. E., Elliott, D., Meegan, D. V., Lyons, J. L., & Welsh, T. N. (2006). The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 413-422. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.413
27. Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.340
28. Milgram, P. (1987). A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 449-456.
29. Plamondon, R., & Alimi, A. M. (1997). Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target directed movements. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 279-349.
30. Proteau, L., & Masson, G. (1997). Visual perception modifies goal-directed movement control: Supporting evidence from a visual perturbation paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 726-741. doi:10.1080/027249897391865
31. van Donkelaar, P., & Franks, I. M. (1991). The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: Evidence from latency, kinematic and EMG measure. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 618-632. doi:10.1007/BF00229840
32. Walker, N., Philbin, D., Worden, A., & Smelcer, J. B. (1997). A program for parsing mouse movements into component submovements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 456-460.
33. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3(Suppl.), 1-119.
34. Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217-236.