Visual perception modifies goal-directed movement control: Supporting evidence from a visual perturbation paradigm

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 726-741

  Proteau, Luc ^a   Masson, Guillaume ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAND; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK; HAND; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031261795     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755729     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams, R.A., & Landgraf, J.Z. (1990). Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 349-359.
2. Abrams, R.A., & Pratt, J. (1993). Rapid aimed limb movements: Differential aspects of practice on component submovements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 288-298.
3. Bacon, J.H., Gordon, A., & Schulman, P.H. (1982). The effects of two types of induced-motion displays on perceived location of the induced target. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 353-359.
4. Blouin, J., Bard, C., Teasdale, N., Paillard, J., Fleury, M., Forget, R., & Lamarre, Y. (1993). Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and in a deafferented patient. Experimental Brain Research, 93, 324-331.
5. Brenner, E. (1991). Judging object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: The role of optical flow. Vision Research, 31, 1893-1902.
6. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J.B.J. (1994). Different frames of reference for position and motion. Naturwissenschaften , 81, 30-32.
7. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
8. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). The relationship between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
9. Buck. L. (1976). Boundary distance effects on overshooting. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 35-41.
10. Carlton, L.G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 3-31). North-Holland: Amsterdam.
11. Collewijn, H., & Tamminga, E.P (1984). Human smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. Journal of Physiology, London, 351, 217-250.
12. Crossman, E.F.R.W., & Goodeve, P.J. (1963/ 1983). Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts' law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 251-278.
13. Duncker, K. (1929). Über induzierte bewegung [On induced motion]. Psychologische Forschung, 12, 180-259.
14. Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of the movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
15. Farber, J.M. (1979). Manual tracking object induced motion. Investigative Ophthalmology, S3.
16. Honrubia, V., Khalili, R., & Baloh, R.W. (1992). Optokinetic and vestibular interactions with smooth pursuit. Psychological responses. In B. Cohen, D.L. Tomko, & F. Guidry (Eds.), Sensing and controlling motion, Vol. 656 (pp. 739-746). New York: Annals of New York Academy of Sciences.
17. Khan, M.A., Franks, I.M., & Goodman, D. (submitted). The effect of practice on the visual control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing.
18. Masson, G., Proteau, L., & Mestre, D.N. (1995). Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans. Vision Research, 35, 837-852.
19. Meyer, D.A., Abrams, R.A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C.E., & Smith, J.E.K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 34-370.
20. Prablanc, C., Echallier, J.F., Jeannerod, M., & Komilis, E. (1979). Optimal responses of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target: II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement. Biological Cybernetics, 35, 183-187.
21. Prablanc, C., Echallier, J.F., Komilis, E., & Jeannerod, J. (1979). Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target: I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information. Biological Cybernetics , 35, 113-124.
22. Prablanc, C., Pelisson, D., & Goodale, M.A. (1986). Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb: I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 293-302.
23. Pratt, J., Chasteen, A.L., & Abrams, R.A. (1994). Rapid aimed limb movements: Age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychology and Aging, 9, 325-334.
24. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 67-103). North-Holland: Amsterdam.
25. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K.L., & Rose, D.J. (1984). Optokinetic backgrounds affect perceived velocity during ocular tracking. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 221-224.
26. Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
27. Schmidt, R.A., Zelaznik, H.N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J.S., Quinn, J.T., Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
28. Smeets, J.B.J., & Brenner, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 21, 19-31.
29. Velay, J.-L., & Beaubaton, D. (1986). Influence of visual context on pointing movement accuracy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 447-456.
30. van den Berg, A.V., & Brenner, E. (1994). Humans combine the optical flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading. Vision Research, 34, 2153-2167.
31. Woodworth, R.S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3 (monograph supplement), 1-119.
32. Worfolk, R., & Barnes, G.R. (1992). Interaction of active and passive slow eye movement systems. Experimental Brain Research, 90, 589-598.
33. Yee, R.D, Daniels, S.A., Jones, O.W., Baloh, R.W., & Honrubia, V. (1983). Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 24, 1115-1122.
34. Young, L.R., Dichgans, J., Murphy, R., & Brandt, T. (1973). Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. Acta Otolaryngologica, 76, 24-31.