Segregation among schools, effects of student body composition, and inequalities in scholastic performance;Ségrégation entre écoles, effets de la composition scolaire et inégalités de résultats

Revue Francaise de Sociologie

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 461-480

  Dumay, Xavier ^a   Dupriez, Vincent ^a   Maroy, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957599925     PISSN: 00352969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/rfs.513.0461     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ball S. J., Maroy C, 2009. - « School's logics of action as mediation and compromise between internal dynamics and external constraints and pressures », Compare: a journal of comparative education, 39, 1, pp. 99-112.
2. Bosker R. J., Witziers B., 1996. - « The magnitude of the school effects. Or: does it really matter which school a student attends ? », paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American educational research association, « Research for education in a democratic society », April 8-12, New York (NY).
3. Coleman J. S., 1966. - Equality of educational opportunity study, Washington (DC), US Congressional Printing Office.
4. Duru-Bellat M., Le Bastard-Landrier S., Piquée C, Suchaut B., 2004. - «Tonalité sociale du contexte et expérience scolaire des éièves au lycée et à l'ècote primaire », Revue française de sociologie, 45, 3, pp. 441-468.
5. Felouzis G., 2003. - « La ségrégation ethnique au collège et ses conséquences », Revue française de sociologie, 44, 3, pp. 413-447.
6. Felouzis G., Liot F., Perroton J., 2005. - l'apartheid scolaire. Enquête sur la segregation ethnique dans les collèges, Paris, Le Seuil.
7. Gorard S., 2006. - « Is there a school mix effect ? », Educational review, 58, 1, pp. 87-94.
8. Harker R., Tymms P., 2004. - « The effects of student composition on school outcomes », School effectiveness and school improvement, 15, 2, pp. 177-199.
9. Lauder H., Hugues D., Watson S., Waslander S., Thrupp M., Strathdee R., Simiyu I., Dupuis A., McGlinn J., Hamlin J., 1999. - Trading in futures: why markets in education don't work, Buckingham, Open University Press.
10. Lauder H., Kounali D., Robinson T., Goldstein H., Thrupp M., 2007. - « Social class, pupil composition, pupil progress and school performance : an analysis of primary schools », working paper downloaded at http://www.bath.ac.uk/research/harps/Resources/ The%20Effects%20of%20Pupil%20Composition%20in%20Primary%20Schools%20wbl.pdf.
11. Maroy C, 2006. - École, régulation et marché. Une comparaison de six espaces scolaires locaux en Europe, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Maroy C, van Zanten A., 2008. - « Régulation et compétition entre établissements scolaires dans six espaces locaux en Europe », Sociologie du travail, 49, 4, pp. 464-478.
13. Marsh H. W., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Köller O., Baumert J., 2005. - « Academic self-concept, interest, grades and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering », Child development, 76, 2, pp. 397-416.
14. Maurin É., 2007. - La nouvelle question scolaire. Les bénéfices de la démoralisation, Paris, Le Seuil.
15. Nash R., 2003. - «Is the school composition effect real ? A discussion with evidence from the UK PISA data », School effectiveness and school improvement, 14, 4, pp. 441-457.
16. Opdenakker M.-C, Van Damme J., 2001. - « Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematic achievement», British educational research journal, 27, 4, pp. 407-432. (Pubitemid 33322288)
17. -2006. - « Differences between secondary schools: a study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and catholic schools and types of schools », School effectiveness and school improvement, 17, 1, pp. 87-117.
18. -2007. - « Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education ? », British educational research journal, 33, 2, pp. 179-206.
19. Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Congdon R. T., 2004. - HLM 6 hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling, Lincolnwood (IL), Scientific Software International.
20. Rumberger R. W., Palardy G. J., 2005. - « Does segregation still matter ? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school», Teachers college record, 107, 9, pp. 1999-2045.
21. Sirin S. R., 2005. - « Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research », Review of educational research, 75, 3, pp. 417-453.
22. Thrupp M., 1999. - Schools making a difference. Let's be realistic ! School mix, school effectiveness, and the social limits of reform, Buckingham, Open University Press.
23. -2007. - « School admissions and the segregation of school intakes in New Zealand cities », Urban studies, 44, 7, pp. 1393-1404.
24. Thrupp M., Lauder H., Robinson T., 2002. - «School composition and peer effects», International journal of educational research, 37, 5, pp. 483-504.
25. Uguroglu M. E., Walberg H. J., 1979. - « Motivation and achievement: a quantitative synthesis », American educational research journal, 16, 4, pp. 375-389.
26. Van der Slik F. W. P., Driessen G. W. J. M., De Bot K. L. J., 2006. - « Ethnic and socioeconomic class composition and language proficiency: a longitudinal multilevel examination in Dutch elementary schools », European sociological review, 22, 3, pp. 293-308.
27. Vandenberghe V., 1998. - « L'enseignement en Communauté française de Belgique: un quasimarché », Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 36, 1, pp. 65-75.
28. Van Zanten A., 2001. - Scolarité et ségrégation en banlieue, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
29. Walzer M., 1983. - Spheres of justice. New York (NY), Basic Books.