Microbiota of the cecum, ileum morphometry, pH of the crop and performance of broiler chickens supplemented with probiotics;Microbiota cecal, morfometria do íleo, pH do inglúvio e desempenho zootécnico de frangos de corte sob suplementação com probióticos

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1756-1760

  Fonseca, Belchiolina Beatriz ^a   Beletti, Marcelo Emílio ^a   da Silva, Max Siqueira ^a   da Silva, Paulo Lourenço ^a   Duarte, Ivamario Nahas ^a   Rossi, Daise Aparecida ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Body weights; Competitive exclusion; Enterobacteria; Intestinal villi; Ration

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 77957583818     PISSN: 15163598     EISSN: 18069290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982010000800018     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ALVARENGA, B.O.; BELETTI, M.E.; FERNANDES, E.A. et al. Efeitos de fontes alternativas de fósforo nas rações de engorda e abate sobre a morfologia intestinal de frangos de corte. Bioscience Journal, v.20, p.55-59, 2004.
2. ALVAREZ, L.C.; BARRERA, E.M.; GONZÁLES, E.A. Evaluación de promotores Del crecimiento para pollos de engorda. Veterinary México, v.24, p.2-2, 1994.
3. APPLEGATE, T.J.; DIBNER, J.J.; KITCHELL, M.L. et al. Effect of turkey (Meleagridid gallopavo) breeder hen age and egg size on poult development. 2. Intestinal villus growth, enterocyte migration and proliferation of the turkey poult. Comparative Biochemistry Physiology, v.124 (B), p.381-389, 1999.
4. BOURLIOUX, P.; KOLETZKO, B.; GUARNER, F.V. The intestine and its microflora are partners for the protection of the host: report on the Danone Symposium: "The Intelligent Intestine", held in Paris. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, v.78, p.675-83, 2003.
5. CAMPOS, D.M.B. Níveis de inclusão de probiótico sobre o desempenho de frangos de corte. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Avícolas, v.4, p.36, 2002.
6. DOYLE, M.P.; ERICKSON, M.C. Reducing the carriage of foodborne pathogens in livestock and poultry. Poultry Science, v.85, p.960-973, 2006.
7. DUKE, G.E. Physiology of digestion and metabolism. Zootec Internacional, v.17, p.50-53, 1994.
8. FARIA FILHO, D.E.; TORRES, K.A.A.; FARIA, D.E. et al. Probiotics for broiler chickens in Brazil: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, v.8, n.2, p.89-98, 2006.
9. FINNEY, A.M.; SMULLENA, J.; FOSTER, H.A. et al. Evaluation of Chromocult coliform agar for the detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae from faecal samples from healthy subjects. Journal of Microbiological Methods, v.54, p.353-358, 2003.
10. FULLER, R. Basis and efficacy of probiotics. World's Poultry Science Journal, v.44, p.69-70, 1988.
11. HINTON JR., A.; BUHR, R.J.; INGRAM, K.D. Reduction of Salmonella in the crop of broiler chickens subjected to feed withdrawal. Poultry Science, v.79, p.1566-1570, 2000.
12. JIN, L.Z.; HO, Y.W.; ABDULLAH, N. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populacions, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science, v.77, p.1259-1265, 1998.
13. LODDI, M.M.; GONZALES, E.; TAKITA, T.S. Effect of the use of probiotic and antibiotic on the performance, yield and carcass quality of broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.29, n.4, p.1124-1131, 2000.
14. MURAKAMI, A.E.; SAKAMOTO, M.I.; NATALI, M.R.M. et al. Supplementation of glutamine and vitamin E on the morphometry of the intestinal mucosa in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, v.86, n.3, p.488-495, 2007.
15. PANDA, A.K. Growth, Carcass characteristics, immunocompetence and response to Escherichia coli of broilers fed diets with various levels of probiotic. Archiv Für Geflügelkunde, v.64, n.4, p.152-156, 2000.
16. PATTERSON, J.A.; BURKHOLDER, K.M. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, v.82, p.627-631, 2003.
17. PELICANO, E.R.L.; SOUZZA, P.A.; OBAB, A. et al. Morfometria e ultra-estrutura da mucosa intestinal de frangos de corte alimentados com dietas contendo diferentes probióticos. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Veterinárias, v.98, p.125-134, 2003.
18. PLUSKE, J.R.; HAMPSON, D.J.; WILLIAMS, I.H. Factors influencing the stricture and function of the small intestine en the weaned pig: a review. Production Science, v. 5 1, p.215-236, 1997.
19. REVOLLEDO, L.; FERREIRA, A.J.P.; MEAD, G.C. Prospects in Salmonella control: competitive exclusion, probiotics, and enhancements of avian intestinal immunity. Journal Applied Poultry Research, v.16, p.341-351, 2006.
20. RIBEIRO, P.R.; KRONKA, R.N.; THOMAZ, M.C. et al. Adicão do ácido fumárico nas rações de suínos e seus efeitos nas fases inicial, crescimento e terminação. Ars Veterinaria, v.18, p.70-77, 2002.
21. RUTZ, F. Proteínas: digestão e absorção. In: MACARI, M.; FURLAN, R.L.; GONZALES, E. et al. (Eds.). Fisiologia aviária aplicada a frangos de corte. 2.ed. Jaboticabal: Funep, 2002. p.135-141.
22. SUIDA, D. Estimulantes do desempenho de galinhas poedeiras e de frangos de corte. 1994. 59f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG.
23. UNI, Z.; GANOT, S.; SJLAN, D. Posthach development of mucosal function in the broiler small intestine. Poultry Science, v.77, p.75-82, 1998.
24. UNI, Z. Vitamin A deficiency interferes with proliferation and maturation of cells in the chickens' small intestine. British Poultry Science, v.41, p.410-415, 2000.
25. ZHU, X.Y.; ZHONG, T.; PANDYA, Y. 16S Rrna-Based analysis of microbiota from cecum of broiler chickens. Applied Environment Microbiology, v.68, n.1, p.124-137, 2002.
26. ZUANON, J.A.S.; FONSECA, J.B.; ROSTAGNO, H.S. et al. Desempenho de frangos de corte alimentados com rações contendo antibiótico e probiótico adicionados isoladamente, associados e em uso seqüencial. Revista brasileira de Zootecnia, v.27, p.994-998, 1995.