Offensive political theory

Perspectives on Politics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 465-486

  Rehfeld, Andrew ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957310926     PISSN: 15375927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1537592710001209     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Almond, Gabriel A. 1966. "Political Theory and Political Science." The American Political Science Review 60(4): 869-879.
2. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Ankersmit, Frank R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4. Barber, Benjamin. 2006. "The Politics of Political Science: 'Value-Free' Theory and the Wolin-Strauss Dust-Up of 1963." American Political Science Review 100(4): 539-545.
5. Barry, Brian. 2002. "Why Political Science Needs Political Theory." Scandinavian Political Studies 25(2): 107-115.
6. Berlin, Isaiah. 1997. "Does Political Theory Still Exist?" In The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, eds. Henry Hardy and Roger Hausheer. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
7. Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Bohman, James. 1991. New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cameron, James. (Director). 2009. Avatar [Motion Picture]. United States: 20th Century Fox.
10. Comte, Auguste. 1988. Introduction to Positive Philosophy. Indianapolis, Indianna: Hackett Publishing Company.
11. Dahl, Robert A. 2002. "What Have We Learned?" In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, eds. Ian Shapiro, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Dryzek, John S. 2005. "A Pox on Perestroika, A Hex on Hegemony: Toward a Critical Political Science." In Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
13. Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State ofPolitical Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
14. Elkin, Stephen. 2006. Reconstructing the Commercial Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Farr, James. 2003. "Political Science." In The Modern Social Sciences, eds. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross. Cambridge History of Science 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Foley, Richard. 1987. The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Freeden, Michael. 2005. "What should the 'Political' in Political Theory Explore?" The Journal ofPolitical Philosophy 13(2): 113-134.
19. Gallie, W.B. 1956. "Essentially Contested Concepts." Proceedings ofthe Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198.
20. Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003. Theory and Reality: an introduction to the philosophy ofscience. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. Goodin, Robert E. and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, eds. 1996. A New Handbook ofPolitical Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Goodman, Nelson. 1973. Fact, Fiction and Forecast, 3rd ed. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
24. Grant, Ruth. 2002. "Political Theory, Political Science, and Politics." Political Theory 30(4): 577-595
25. Green, Donald and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies ofRational Choice Theory: A Critique ofApplications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. Greenberg, Daniel. 1999. The Politics ofPure Science, new ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27. 2003. Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Hare, R. M. 1989. "What is wrong with slavery?" In Essays on Political Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Hauptman, Emily. 2006. "From Accommodation to Opposition: How Rockefeller Foundation Grants Redefined Relations between Political Theory and Social Science in the 1950s." American Political Science Review 100(4): 643-649.
30. Heilbron, Johan. 2003. "Social Thought and Natural Science." In The Modern Social Sciences, eds. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross. The Cambridge History of Science 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hempel, Carl. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Prentice Hall.
32. Jacobs, Jerry A. 2009. "Interdisciplinary Hype." The Chronicle of Higher Education 56(14), http:// chronicle.com/article/Interdisciplinary- Hype/49191/ (accessed January 15, 2010).
33. Katznelson, Ira and Helen V. Milner. 2002. "American Political Science: The Discipline's State and the State of the Discipline." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, eds. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
34. Kelly, Paul. 2006. "Political Theory-The State of the Art." Politics 26(1): 47-53.
35. Keohane, Robert O. 2009. "Political Science as a Vocation." PS: Political Sceince and Politics 42(2): 359363.
36. Kettler, David. 2005. "The Political Theory Question in Political Science, 1956-1967." The American Political Science Review 100(4): 531-537.
37. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Lakatos, Imre. 1970. "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes." In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Larmore, Charles. 1996. The Morals of Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Lovett, Francis. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Manicas, Peter. 1992. "Nature and Culture." Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66(3): 59-76.
43. Margolis, Eric and Stephen Laurence, eds. 1999. Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Meilleur, Maurice. 2005. "After Methodology: Toward a Profession of Political Science." In Perestroika! TheRaucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
45. Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Mill, John Stuart. 1987. On the Logic of the Moral Sciences. London: Duckworth.
47. Monroe, Kristen Renwick, ed. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
48. Mutz, Diana C. 2008. "Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?" Annual Review ofPolitical Science 11: 521-538
49. NASA. 2003. "Saturn-Bound Spacecraft Tests Einstein's Theory." National Aeronautics and Space Administration press release. newsreleases/newsrelease20031002/ (accessed May 26, 2009).
50. Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Popper, Karl R. 1989. "Science: Conjectures and Refutations." In Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
52. Porter, Theodore M. 2003. "Genres and Objects of Social Inquiry, from the Enlightenment to 1890." In The Modern Social Sciences, eds. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross. The Cambridge History of Science 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Putnam, Hillary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2003. Review of Political Representation, by F.R. Ankersmit. Ethics 113(4): 866-868.
55. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. -. 2007. Review of Reconstructing the Commercial Republic: Constitutional Design after Madison, by Stephen Elkin. Perspectives on Politics 5(2): 349-350.
57. 2008. Jephthah, The Hebrew Bible, and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government. Hebraic Political Studies. 3(1):60-93.
58. Ross, Dorothy. 2003. "Changing Contours of the Social Science Disciplines." In The Modern Social Sciences, eds. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross. The Cambridge History of Science 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Scanlon, T. M. 1982. "Contractualism and Utilitarianism." In Utilitarianism and Beyond, eds. Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Schram, Sanford F. 2006. "Return to Politics: Pere- stroika, Phronesis, and Post-Paradigmatic Political Science." In Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method, eds. Sanford F. Schram and Brian Caterino. New York: New York University Press.
61. 2005. A Return to Politics. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
62. Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
63. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Shapin, Steven. 1999. "Foreword." In The Politics of Pure Science, new ed., by Daniel Greenberg. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
65. Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
66. Shapiro, Ian. 2002. "Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About It." Political Theory 30(4): 596-619.
67. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
68. Skinner, Quentin, Partha Dasgupta, Raymond Geuss, Melissa Lane, Peter Laslett, Onora O'Neill, W. G. Runciman, and Andrew Kuper. 2002. "Political Philosophy: The View from Cambridge." The Journal of Political Philosophy 10(1): 1-19.
69. Snow, C.P. 1993. The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Steinberger, Peter J. 2005. "Reforming the Discipline: Some Doubts." In Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, ed. Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
71. Strauss, Leo. 1959. "What is Political Philosophy?" In What is Political Philosophy? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Taylor, Charles. 1987. "Interpretation and the Sciences of Man." In Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, eds. Paul Rabinow and William M. Sullivan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Teachout, Terry. 2008. "Hitler's Accompanists." Commentary 125(1): 50-52.
74. Thompson, Dennis. 2008. "Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science." Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497-520.
75. Topper, Keith. 2005. The Disorder ofPolitical Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Turner, Stephen. 2003. "Cause, Teleology and Method." In The Modern Social Sciences, eds. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross. The Cambridge History of Science 7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Wallerstein, Immanuel, Calestous Juma, Evelyn Fox Keller, Jurgen Kocka, Dominique Lecourt, V.Y. Mu- dimbe, Kinhide Mushakoji, Ilya Prigogine, Peter J. Taylor, and Michel-Rolph Trouillot. 1996. Open the Social Sciences: Report ofthe Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
78. Weber, Max. 1949. "'Objectivity' in Social Science and Social Policy." In The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Trans. and ed. by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. New York: The Free Press.
79. Wendt, Alex. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. White, Stephen. ed. 2002. "What is Political Theory?" Special issue, Political Theory 30(4).
81. Wolin, Sheldon. 1969. "Political Theory as a Vocation." American Political Science Review 63(4): 1062-1082.