Political science

The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 306-328

  Farr, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947535748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America(1835), ed. J. P. Mayer (New York: Harper and Row, 1966), p. 12.
2. Mary O. Furner, Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865-1905(Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975).
3. Thomas L. Haskell, The Emergence of Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth Century Crisis of Authority(Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977).
4. Peter T. Manicas, A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences(Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).
5. Bernard Crick, The American Science of Politics(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959).
6. Edward A. Purcell, The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value(Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1973).
7. David M. Ricci, The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy(New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984).
8. Edward J. Harpham, Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984(Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985).
9. James W. Ceaser, Liberal Democracy and Political Science(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990).
10. James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard, eds., Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
11. Anna Haddow, Political Science in American Colleges and Universities, 1636-1900(New York: Appleton-Century, 1939).
12. Stefan Collini, Donald Winch, and John Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth Century Intellectual History(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
13. Dorothy Ross, The Origins of American Social Science(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
14. James Farr, “From Modern Republic to Administrative State: American Political Science in the United States,” in Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science, ed. David Easton, John G. Gunnell, and Michael B. Stein (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991), pp. 131-67.
15. Francis Lieber, Civil Liberty and Self-Government(1853), 3rd ed. (Philadelipha: J. B. Lippincott, 1901), p. 156.
16. Jack Hayward, “Cultural and Contextual Constraints upon the Development of Political Science in Great Britain,” in The Development of Political Science, ed.David Easton, John G.Gunnell, and Luigi Graziano (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 95.
17. William G. Andrews, ed., International Handbook of Political Science(Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982).
18. Johann K. Bluntschli, The Theory of the State, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1895), pp. 3-463.
19. Peter Wagner, Sozialwissenschaften und Staat: Frankreich, Italien, Deutschland, 1870-1980(Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1990).
20. Pierre Favre, Naissance de la Science Politique en France, 1870-1914(Paris: Fayard, 1989).
21. John G. Gunnell, The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
22. John W. Burgess, Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law, vol. 1 (Boston: Ginn, 1891), pp. 3-72.
23. Collini, Burrow, That Noble Science, chap. 7.
24. Dorothy Ross, Origin of American Social Science, chap. 3
25. Woodrow Wilson, An Old Master and Other Political Essays(New York: Scribner’s, 1893), p. 51.
26. James Bryce, The American Commonwealth (1893), 2nd ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1922), p. 4.
27. Woodrow Wilson, Old Master, pp. 105, 111, 118, 136.
28. Woodrow Wilson, “The Study of Administration,” Political Science Quarterly, 2 (1887), 198.
29. Frank J. Goodnow, Municipal Problems(New York: Macmillan, 1897), pp. 147, 309-10.
30. Albert Somit and Joseph Tanenhaus, The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism(Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1967), chap. 5.
31. David M. Ricci, Tragedy of Political Science, chap. 3.
32. Graham Wallas, Human Nature in Politics, 3rd ed. (New York: Knopf, 1920), pp. 9, 25, 37.
33. Henry Jones Ford, The Natural History of the State(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1915), pp. 1-131.
34. John S. Dryzek and David Schlosberg, “Disciplining Darwin: Biology in the History of Political Science,” in Political Science in History, ed. Farr, Dryzek, and Leonard, pp. 123-44.
35. Arthur F. Bentley, The Process of Government, ed. Peter H. Odegard (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 162-3, 263, 455.
36. Ernest Barker, “The Discredited State,” Political Quarterly, 2 (1915), 101-26.
37. William Y. Elliott, The Pragmatic Revolt in Politics(New York: Macmillan, 1928), p. 86.
38. Paul Q. Hirst, The Pluralist Theory of the State(London: Routledge, 1989), p. 8.
39. Mary Parker Follett, The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government(New York: Longmans, 1920), pp. 7, 11, 75, 168.
40. Mary G. Dietz and James Farr, “‘Politics Would Undoubtedly Un woman Her’: Gender, Suffrage, and the Origins of American Political Science,” in Gender and American Social Science: The Formative Years, ed. Helene Silverberg (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998), pp. 61-85.
41. Hans Kastendiek, “Political Development and Political Science inWest Germany,” in Development of Political Science, ed. Easton, Gunnell, and Graziano, pp. 108-26.
42. Charles E. Merriam, New Aspects of Politics (1925, 1931), 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970) p. 334.
43. Francis G. Wilson, “The Pragmatic Electorate,” APSR, 24 (1930), 32, 35, 37.
44. George E. G. Catlin, The Science and Methods of Politics(New York: Knopf, 1927), pp. 84-298.
45. William Y. Elliott, “The Possibility of a Science of Politics,” in Methods in Social Science: A Case Book, ed. Stuart Rice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931), p. 74.
46. William Y. Elliott, Pragmatic Revolt in Politics, pp. 53, 84-5, 337.
47. Barry S. Karl, Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).
48. Donald Fisher, Fundamental Development of the Social Sciences: Rockefeller Philanthropy and the Merriam, New Aspects of Politics, pp. 105, 132, 173, 348, 350.
49. Kurt Danziger, Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language(London: Sage, 1997).
50. Harold D. Lasswell, Propaganda Technique in the World War(New York: Knopf, 1927), p. 9.
51. Harold D. Lasswell, “Propaganda,” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. E. R. A. Seligman (New York: Macmillan, 1934), vol. 12, p. 525.
52. Harold D. Lasswell, “The Theory of Political Propaganda,” APSR, 21 (1927), 627-631.
53. John G. Gunnell, Descent of Political Theory, chaps. 7-9, at pp. 185-198.
54. Harold D. Lasswell, “The Developing Science of Democracy,” in The Future of Government in the United States, ed. Leonard D. White (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942), pp. 25, 31, 33, 34, 43.
55. Trent, Favre, International Handbook of Political Science, pp. 34-46, 154-68, 169-76.
56. Hans Kastendiek, “Political Development French Political Science and Its Subfields,” in Development of Political Science, ed. Easton, Gunnell, and Graziano, pp. 108-26, 147-86.
57. Terence Ball, “American Political Science in Its Postwar Political Context,” in Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States, ed. James Farr and Raymond Seidelman (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993), pp. 207-21.
58. James Farr, “Remembering the Revolution: Behavioralism in American Political Science,” in Political Science in History, ed. Farr, Dryzek, and Leonard, pp. 198-224.
59. David Easton, The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science(1953), 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), chaps. 4-5, 10.
60. Bernard R. Berelson, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee, Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954), pp. 306- 312.
61. Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes, The American Voter(New York: Wiley, 1960).
62. Robert A. Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), chaps. 3-5.
63. Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man(Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959), p. 439.
64. Robert A. Dahl, “Epitaph,” p. 766.
65. Heinz Eulau, The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics(New York: Random House, 1963), p. 8.
66. Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 43-45.
67. Leo Strauss, “Epilogue,” in Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics, ed. Herbert J. Storing (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962), pp. 311-327.
68. Luigi Graziano, “The Development and Institutionalization of Political Science in Italy,” in Development of Political Science, ed. Easton, Gunnell, and Graziano, pp. 108-26, 147-86, 127-46.
69. Raymond Seidelman, Disenchanted Realists, p. 198.
70. David Easton, “The New Revolution in Political Science,” APSR, 63 (1969), 1051, 1057, 1061.
71. Kristen R. Monroe, ed., The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action(New York: Harper Collins, 1991).
72. Ian Shapiro and Donald P. Green, Pathologies of Rational Choice: A Critique of Applications in Political Science(New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994).
73. Quentin Skinner, ed., The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
74. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
75. Ronald Beiner, ed., Theories of Citizenship(Albany: StateUniversity ofNew York Press, 1995).
76. Robert D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).
77. Sidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, (1995).