Changing contours of the social science disciplines

The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 203-237

  Ross, Dorothy ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927978738     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Charles E. Mc Clelland, State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700-1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).
2. Lawrence Stone, ed., The University in Society, 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974).
3. Kurt Danziger, Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), chap. 1 and pp. 39-42.
4. Thomas L. Haskell, The Emergence of Professional Social Science (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977).
5. Bernard Yack, The Fetishism of Modernities: Epochal Self-Consciousness in Contemporary Social and Political Thought (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), chap. 5, at pp. 116-117.
6. Nikolas Rose, The Psychological Complex: Psychology, Politics and Society in England, 1869-1939 (London: Routledge, 1985).
7. Bruno Latour, Science in Action (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
8. Andrew Pickering, ed., Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
9. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish (New York: Pantheon, 1978).
10. Robert C. Bannister, Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880-1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).
11. John Maloney, Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1985).
12. David F. Lindenfeld, The Practical Imagination: The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).
13. Henrika Kuklick, The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885-1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), chap. 1.
14. Donald N. Levine, Visions of the Sociological Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
15. Wolf Lepenies, Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
16. Peter J. Bowler, in The Non-Darwinian Revolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).
17. Robert Bannister, in Social Darwinism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1979).
18. Donna Haraway, Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science (New York: Routledge, 1989).
19. Eileen Janes Yeo, The Contest for Social Science: Relations and Representations of Gender and Class (London: Rivers Oram Press, 1996).
20. Rosalind Rosenberg, Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982).
21. Ellen Fitzpatrick, Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
22. Ellen Fitzpatrick, Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990);
23. Helene Silverberg, ed., Gender and American Social Science: The Formative Years (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998).
24. Martin Bulmer, Kevin Bales, and Kathryn Kish Sklar, eds., The Social Survey in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
25. Peter Wagner, Carol H. Weiss, Bj¨orn Wittrock, and HellmutWollmann, eds., Social Sciences andModern States (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1991).
26. David Hollinger, “The Knower and the Artificer, with Postscript 1993,” in Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870-1930, ed. Dorothy Ross (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), pp. 26-53.
27. David Hollinger, “James, Clifford, and the Scientific Conscience,” in The Cambridge Companion toWilliam James, ed. Ruth Anna Putnam (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1997), pp. 69-83.
28. Thomas Burger, MaxWeber’s Theory of Concept Formation, exp. ed. (Durham, N.C.:DukeUniversity Press, 1987).
29. John Higham, “The Schism in American Scholarship,” in his Writing American History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1970).
30. Stephen P. Turner and Dirk K¨asler, eds., Sociology Responds to Fascism (London: Routledge, 1992).
31. Ulfried Geuter, The Professionalization of Psychology inNaziGermany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
32. Judith Sklar, “AlexanderHamilton and the Language of Political Science,” in Redeeming American Political Thought, ed. StanleyHoffmann and Dennis F. Thompson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 3-13.
33. Theodore M. Porter, in Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).
34. David Hollinger, “The Problem of Pragmatism in AmericanHistory,” in his In the American Province: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ideas (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), pp. 23-43.
35. Robert Hollinger and David Depew, eds, Pragmatism: From Progressivism to Postmodernism (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1995), pp. 78-81, 118.
36. Stephen Turner, “The Pittsburgh Survey and the Survey Movement: An Episode in the History of Expertise,” in Pittsburgh Surveyed: Social Science and Social Reform in the Early Twentieth Century, ed. Maurine W. Greenwald and Margo Anderson (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996), pp. 35-49.
37. John M. Jordan, Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911-1939 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994).
38. John B. Watson, Behaviorism (1924) (New York: Norton, 1970), p. 11.
39. Kerry W. Buckley, Mechanical Man: John Broadus Watson and the Beginnings of Behaviorism (New York: Guilford Press, 1989).
40. Laurence D. Smith, Behaviorism and Logical Positivism (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986).
41. Mary S. Morgan and Malcolm Rutherford, “American Economics: The Character of the Transformation,” in From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. Mary S. Morgan and Malcolm Rutherford (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998).
42. Katherine Pandora, Rebels within the Ranks: Psychologists’ Critique of Scientific Authority and Democratic Realities in New Deal America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
43. Richard Wightman Fox, “Epitaph for Middletown: Robert S. Lynd and the Analysis of Consumer Culture,” in The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880-1980 (New York: Pantheon, 1983).
44. Victor Karady, “The Prehistory of Present-Day French Sociology 1917-1957,” in French Sociology: Rupture and Renewal Since 1968, ed. Charles C. Lemert (New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1981).
45. Claus-Dieter Krohn, “Dismissal and Emigration of German-Speaking Economists after 1933,” in Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Emigr´e German-Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933, ed. Mitchell G. Ash and Alfons Sollner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 188.
46. Barry D. Karl and Stanley N. Katz, “The American Private Philanthropic Foundation and the Public Sphere, 1890-1930,” Minerva, 19 (1981), 236-70
47. David C. Hammack and Stanton Wheeler, eds., Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1972 (New York: Russell Sage, 1994).
48. Jon H. Roberts, “The Human Mind and Personality,” in Encyclopedia of the United States in the Twentieth Century, ed. Stanley I. Kutler (New York: Scribner’s, 1996), vol. 2, pp. 877-98.
49. A.W. Coats, ed., The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1996).
50. Burton R. Clark and Guy R. Neave, eds., Academic Disciplines and Indexes, vol. 4 of The Encyclopedia of Higher Education (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992).
51. Cf. Bernard Berelson, “Behavioral Sciences,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. David L. Sills (New York: Macmillan, 1968), vol. 2, pp. 41-5.
52. Meinlof Dierkes and Biervert Pieter J. van Strien, “The American ‘Colonization’ of Northwest European Social Psychology after World War II,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 33 (Fall 1997), 349-63.
53. Hans Kastendiek, “Political Development and Political Science in West Germany,” in The Development of Political Science, ed. David Easton, John G. Gunnell, and Luigi Graziano (London: Routledge, 1991);
54. Charles H. Page, “The Decline of Sociology’s Constituency,” History of Sociology, 6 (Fall 1985), 1-10.
55. Witt rock, “Discourse and Discipline,” p. 269.
56. Lemert Charles, ed., French Sociology, pp. 26-7, 41.
57. Richard J. Bernstein, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985) and his The New Constellation: The Ethical- Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991).
58. Richard J. Bernstein Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in theUnited States: 1995 Profile (Washington, D.C.:National Science Foundation, 1998).
59. A. W. Coats, “Conclusion,” in The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, p. 396.
60. A.W. Coats, “Report of Discussions,” in The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, pp. 383-6.
61. Gerstein, Luce, The Behavioral and Social Sciences. Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1996).