Electrophysiological Evidence of Alcohol-Related Attentional Bias in Social Drinkers Low in Alcohol Sensitivity

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 508-515

  Shin, Eunsam ^a   Hopfinger, Joseph B ^b   Lust, Sarah A ^a   Henry, Erika A ^a   Bartholow, Bruce D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol cues; Attention; Brain; Capture; ERP; Event related brain potentials; IIN; Neural

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; RESPONSE TIME; RISK FACTOR; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ETHANOL; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77957289305     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019663     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 11:111-113. American Encephalographic Society.
2. Bartholow B.D., Henry E.A., Lust S.A. Effects of alcohol sensitivity on P3 event-related potential reactivity to alcohol cues. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2007, 21:553-563.
3. Bartholow, B. D., Lust, S. A., & Tragesser, S. L. (in press). Specificity of P3 event-related potential reactivity to alcohol cues in individuals low in alcohol sensitivity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.
4. Cannon T.D., Keller M.C. Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2006, 2:267-290.
5. Carretié L., Mercado F., Tapia M. Parietal ERP activity and appetite. Motivation and Emotion 2000, 24:1-12.
6. Carter B.L., Tiffany S.T. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 1999, 94:327-340.
7. Chambers C.D., Payne J.M., Stokes M.G., Mattingley J.B. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:217-218.
8. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Ollinger J.M., McAvoy M.P., Shulman G.L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:292-296.
9. Cox W.M., Hogan L.M., Kristina M.R., Race J.H. Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers' treatment outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2002, 68:237-243.
10. Cox W.M., Yeates G.N., Regan C.M. Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999, 55:85-89.
11. Di Russo F., Martinez A., Sereno M., Pitzalis S., Hillyard S.A. The cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potentials. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 15:95-111.
12. Duka T., Townshend J.M. The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 2004, 176:353-361.
13. Engelmann J.B., Pessoa L. Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion 2007, 7:668-674.
14. Fadardi J.S., Cox W.M. Alcohol attentional bias: Drinking salience or cognitive impairment?. Psychopharmacology 2006, 185:169-178.
15. Field M., Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 2005, 183:350-357.
16. Franken I.H.A. Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 2003, 27:563-576.
17. Gottesman I.I., Gould T.D. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2003, 160:636-645.
18. Handy T.C., Green V., Klein R., Mangun G.R. Combined expectancies: ERPs reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:303-317.
19. Heath A.C., Madden P.A., Bucholz K.K., Dinwiddie S.H., Slutzke W.S., Bierut L.J., Martin N.G. Genetic differences in alcohol sensitivity and the inheritance of alcoholism risk. Psychological Medicine 1999, 29:1069-1081.
20. Hillyard S.A., Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1998, 95:781-787.
21. Hopfinger J.B., Mangun G.R. Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science 1998, 9:441-447.
22. Hopfinger J.B., Mangun G.R. Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2001, 1:56-65.
23. Hopfinger J.B., Ries A.J. Automatic versus contingent mechanisms of sensory-driven neural biasing and reflexive attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1341-1352.
24. Ito T.A., Larsen J.T., Smith K., Cacioppo J.T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:887-900.
25. LaBerge D. Attention, consciousness, and electrical wave activity within the cortical column. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2001, 43:5-24.
26. LaBerge D. Attentional control: Brief and prolonged. Psychological Research 2002, 66:220-233.
27. Lang P.J. The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist 1995, 50:372-385.
28. Lusher J., Chandler C., Ball D. Alcohol dependence and the alcohol Stroop paradigm: Evidence and issues. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2004, 75:225-231.
29. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Modulation of sensory-evoked brain potentials provide evidence for changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:1057-1074.
30. Mann R.E., Sobell L.C., Sobell M.B., Pavin D. Reliability of a family tree questionnaire for assessing family history of alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1985, 15:61-67.
31. Newlin D.B., Renton R.M. High risk groups often have higher levels of alcohol response than low risk: The other side of the coin. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2010, 34:199-202.
32. Newlin D.B., Thomson J.B. Alcohol challenge with sons of alcoholics: A critical review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:383-402.
33. Nobre A.C., Sebestyen G.N., Miniussi C. The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologica 2000, 38:964-974.
34. O'Neill S.E., Sher K.J., Bartholow B.D. Alcohol susceptibility and tolerance in young adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2002, 26:119A.
35. Posner M.I., Rothbart M. The development of attentional mechanisms. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1980, 28:1-52. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. J.H. Flowers (Ed.).
36. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R., Davidson J. Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1980, 109:160-174.
37. Posner M.I., Walker J.A., Friedrich F.J., Rafal B.D. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience 1984, 4:1863-1874.
38. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Mechanisms of action of addictive stimuli: Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 2001, 96:103-114.
39. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:25-53.
40. Ryan F. Attentional bias and alcohol dependence: A controlled study using the modified Stroop paradigm. Addictive Behaviors 2002, 27:471-482.
41. Schuckit M.A. Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. The American Journal of Psychiatry 1994, 151:184-189.
42. Schuckit M.A., Edenberg J., Kalmijn J.A., Flury T.L., Smith T., Reich L., Foroud T. A genome-wide search for genes that relate to a low level of response to alcohol. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2001, 25:323-329.
43. Schuckit M.A., Smith T.L. The relationships of a family history of alcohol dependence, a low level of response to alcohol and six domains of life functioning to the development of alcohol use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2000, 61:827-835.
44. Schuckit M.A., Smith T.L., Trim R.S. Letter to the editor. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2010, 34:203-205.
45. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Cacioppo J.T., Ito T.A., Lang P.J. Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:257-261.
46. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Preesslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:695-703.
47. Sharma D., Albery I.P., Cook C. Selective attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction 2001, 96:285-295.
48. Stewart J., DeWitt H., Eikelboom R. The role of conditioned and unconditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Review 1984, 91:251-268.
49. Stritzke W.G.K., Breiner M.J., Curtin J.J., Lang A.R. Assessment of substance cue reactivity: Advances in reliability, specificity, and validity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2004, 18:148-159.
50. Townshend J.M., Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: Differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2001, 157:67-74.
51. Wiers R.W., Cox W.M., Field M., Fadardi J.S., Palfai T.P., Schoenmakers T., Stacy A.W. The search for new ways to change implicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2006, 30:320-331.
52. Williams, M. A., Sher, K. J., & Bartholow, B. D. (2009). A two-part model of alcohol sensitivity: An alternative psychometric approach to conditional response data. Manuscript in preparation.